Simple 2257 question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jojojo
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Mar 2002
    • 2318

    #1

    Simple 2257 question

    Let's say I wanted to use a softcore pic of chick from a solo girl site on a domain as the ad and link that to the paysite.

    if this is the only pic on the entire domain do I need to link to that paysite's 2257 link? or link somewhere or something?
    Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092
  • After Shock Media
    It's coming look busy
    • Mar 2001
    • 35299

    #2
    Assuming they indeed placed sub section (e) back into the 2257/2256 rules as has been reported during the court hearings, then a soft core non explicit photo would not need 2257 documentation, which would mean no link would be required.

    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

    Comment

    • jojojo
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Mar 2002
      • 2318

      #3
      Originally posted by After Shock Media
      Assuming they indeed placed sub section (e) back into the 2257/2256 rules as has been reported during the court hearings, then a soft core non explicit photo would not need 2257 documentation, which would mean no link would be required.
      Thanks - thats good news

      Here is another stupid noob 2257 question... what is the definition of softcore non explicit?

      girl with/without panties bending over for the camera? does that fall in the definition?
      Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092

      Comment

      • Michaelious
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2004
        • 6720

        #4
        this is all just getting too complicated lol

        Comment

        • After Shock Media
          It's coming look busy
          • Mar 2001
          • 35299

          #5
          Originally posted by jojojo
          Thanks - thats good news

          Here is another stupid noob 2257 question... what is the definition of softcore non explicit?

          girl with/without panties bending over for the camera? does that fall in the definition?
          Again if they added sub section (e) back into 2256/2257. Then the same standards that used to exist for non explicit will remain the same.

          [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

          Comment

          • MrPinks
            Registered User
            • Oct 2003
            • 1767

            #6
            But what if the softcore pic is from a hardcore set?

            Comment

            • pornguy
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Mar 2003
              • 62910

              #7
              If the thumb links to hardcore, then you have to have it. thumb to softcore, you wont. BUT the big this is, what will they decide is or is not hard core.
              PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

              AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
              TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

              Comment

              • EZRhino
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2003
                • 6258

                #8
                Originally posted by After Shock Media
                Assuming they indeed placed sub section (e) back into the 2257/2256 rules as has been reported during the court hearings, then a soft core non explicit photo would not need 2257 documentation, which would mean no link would be required.
                Sounds about right

                Comment

                • After Shock Media
                  It's coming look busy
                  • Mar 2001
                  • 35299

                  #9
                  Originally posted by pornguy
                  If the thumb links to hardcore, then you have to have it. thumb to softcore, you wont. BUT the big this is, what will they decide is or is not hard core.
                  Again this would be covered in sub section (e) of the exemptions. It says in a pretty matter of fact way what is and is not covered.

                  [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • jojojo
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Mar 2002
                    • 2318

                    #10
                    so it definitely depends on what it links to?
                    Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092

                    Comment

                    • After Shock Media
                      It's coming look busy
                      • Mar 2001
                      • 35299

                      #11
                      Originally posted by jojojo
                      so it definitely depends on what it links to?
                      That is a very legal question.
                      Personally I think no it does not matter unless your linking to something on the same domain or same owners.

                      That would almost be the equivilant of amazon having 2257 on a softcore box cover picture that when you buy contains hardcore material.

                      [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                      Comment

                      Working...