GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Question for the military guys... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=507512)

Sly 08-23-2005 10:20 PM

Question for the military guys...
 
Why do we have an Air Force and a Navy when it seems like the Navy has a very large air presence? And what different tasks does the Air Force have that the Air Navy doesn't have and vice-versa?

tony286 08-23-2005 10:23 PM

good question im curious too

Big_Papi 08-23-2005 10:24 PM

I was told by a F-15 pilot that most fighter planes based off of carriers are there to support the carrier itself. i.e. they defend within a certain perimeter. This is not to say that they do not also provide support sorties. AF is installation based and provide all roles. This is how I was brought to understand it but I could be wrong. I have been in the USAF for 10 years btw.

Dre

Mr Pheer 08-23-2005 10:24 PM

the Army has more aircraft than the other branches of the military have

bet you didnt know that

Sly 08-23-2005 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big_Papi
I was told by a F-15 pilot that most fighter planes based off of carriers are there to support the carrier itself. i.e. they defend within a certain perimeter. This is not to say that they do not also provide support sorties. AF is installation based and provide all roles. This is how I was brought to understand it but I could be wrong. I have been in the USAF for 10 years btw.

Dre

If fighter planes are only there to support the carrier, then what's the point of having the carrier? We have bases all over the world to launch attacks from.

Sly 08-23-2005 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrPheer
the Army has more aircraft than the other branches of the military have

bet you didnt know that

I always assumed the Army had a fair amount of planes to move equipment and personnel, and a fair amount of choppers to move personnel quickly and provide low and accurate air support... but no, I didn't realize the Army had fighters.

Mr Pheer 08-23-2005 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
I always assumed the Army had a fair amount of planes to move equipment and personnel, and a fair amount of choppers to move personnel quickly and provide low and accurate air support... but no, I didn't realize the Army had fighters.

i didnt say it had fighters, i said it had more aircraft

a helicopter is an aircraft

PixeLs 08-23-2005 11:11 PM

I didn't know about this thing. Glad youn posted it here.

kmanrox 08-24-2005 12:40 AM

For the same reason the Army and the Marines exist. Specialties. Army is basic ground stuff, Marines specialize in beach assaults and water-initiated assaults... Ironically since the Marines are a much smaller branch, yet they usually fight first, we get the second-hand weapons and technology that the wealthier Army doesnt use anymore. God bless the USA lol

venus 08-24-2005 12:51 AM

actually the marines dont usually fight first, thats a myth made up by the marines for recruitment, the army usually is the first on the ground during combat, either the rangers, special forces or the airborne.
the marines do more support operations in support of embassies tho - the marines also do allot of the show of force stuff, but when its a real war, the army is the leader - thats why they get all the good stuff :)


Quote:

Originally Posted by Hedonistic
For the same reason the Army and the Marines exist. Specialties. Army is basic ground stuff, Marines specialize in beach assaults and water-initiated assaults... Ironically since the Marines are a much smaller branch, yet they usually fight first, we get the second-hand weapons and technology that the wealthier Army doesnt use anymore. God bless the USA lol


johnnyhey 08-24-2005 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
If fighter planes are only there to support the carrier, then what's the point of having the carrier? We have bases all over the world to launch attacks from.

we DON'T have bases all over the world. a carrier allows us to bring the fight to anyone anywhere. look at all the problems we had with using turkey to launch the invasion of iraq.

also the air force is in charge of launching ICBMS, which the navy doesn't. the navy has crusise missles launched from ships and subs.

theking 08-24-2005 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
Why do we have an Air Force and a Navy when it seems like the Navy has a very large air presence? And what different tasks does the Air Force have that the Air Navy doesn't have and vice-versa?

Easy answer...long range heavy bombers.

theking 08-24-2005 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
If fighter planes are only there to support the carrier, then what's the point of having the carrier? We have bases all over the world to launch attacks from.

Of course they are don't only protect carriers...if that were the case there would be a need to have carriers. The carriers are used to forward position air power into an AO.

theking 08-24-2005 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyhey
we DON'T have bases all over the world. a carrier allows us to bring the fight to anyone anywhere. look at all the problems we had with using turkey to launch the invasion of iraq.

also the air force is in charge of launching ICBMS, which the navy doesn't. the navy has crusise missles launched from ships and subs.

The Navy has ICBM's also...ever hear of Boomers/subs?

spunkmaster 08-24-2005 01:04 AM

A carrier protects a fleet.

Carrier based jets are air to air and most of the Air Force jets are
Air to ground.

theking 08-24-2005 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by venus
actually the marines dont usually fight first, thats a myth made up by the marines for recruitment, the army usually is the first on the ground during combat, either the rangers, special forces or the airborne.
the marines do more support operations in support of embassies tho - the marines also do allot of the show of force stuff, but when its a real war, the army is the leader - thats why they get all the good stuff :)

You are correct. It is usually Airborne forces that are inserted first...and Rangers...Special Forces...and Special Operation Forces (of which certain Marine units are part of Special Operation Forces...Force Recon being one such unit)...are all Airborne qualified.

theking 08-24-2005 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster
A carrier protects a fleet.

Carrier based jets are air to air and most of the Air Force jets are
Air to ground.

Carrier based jets are not only air to air...they also provide air to ground support...specifically Marine aircraft which are carrier based.

theking 08-24-2005 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
Of course they are don't only protect carriers...if that were the case there would be a need to have carriers. The carriers are used to forward position air power into an AO.

That should read..."there would not be a need".

blackfeet 08-24-2005 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
If fighter planes are only there to support the carrier, then what's the point of having the carrier? We have bases all over the world to launch attacks from.

sometimes we're not able to occupy the land. a base maybe to far away, so you have the ships on the sea to launch attacks and refuel.

kmanrox 08-24-2005 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by venus
actually the marines dont usually fight first, thats a myth made up by the marines for recruitment, the army usually is the first on the ground during combat, either the rangers, special forces or the airborne.
the marines do more support operations in support of embassies tho - the marines also do allot of the show of force stuff, but when its a real war, the army is the leader - thats why they get all the good stuff :)

the army may lead ops inland, but beach assaults are lead by the Marines, especially in the rougher areas... we had a saying that we did the killing, then the army comes UP THE REAR and buries the bodies.

theking 08-24-2005 07:43 AM

Bump for Sly.

sperbonzo 08-24-2005 07:52 AM

Basically it is so that each branch can organize it's own set of forces for it's own missions, whatever those happen to be.

We could simply have a "military" and have all weapons and personnel under the same command structure, but it would be very hard to be efficient, and certain kinds of missions need certain kinds of people, skills and experience.

Naval pilots are particularly skilled in Naval operations, and the command structure is much more simple if the Navy commanders can command their own pilots during their own missions, without having to link up with another branch, eg the Air Force.

This is also why the Marines have their own Aircraft. That way they can talk to their own people that are speciallized in dealing with supporting the marine ground units.


It's just a more efficient way to set things up.

sperbonzo 08-24-2005 10:53 AM

BTW what prompted the question?

johnnyhey 08-24-2005 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
The Navy has ICBM's also...ever hear of Boomers/subs?

the polaris missle (shot from a sub) doesn't have the range of a real ICBM. polaris range is somewhere in the neighborhood of 1500 NM.

johnnyhey 08-24-2005 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking
Carrier based jets are not only air to air...they also provide air to ground support...specifically Marine aircraft which are carrier based.

the marines generally don't use the navy flattops, they have their own ships to launch their air assaults. that's why the marines use the harrier jump jet, because they don't have full size carriers like the navy. the marines don't rely on ANYONE else, they provide ground AND air. that's the way they like it. :)

Sly 08-24-2005 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyhey
the marines generally don't use the navy flattops, they have their own ships to launch their air assaults. that's why the marines use the harrier jump jet, because they don't have full size carriers like the navy. the marines don't rely on ANYONE else, they provide ground AND air. that's the way they like it. :)

The Marines have their own ships?

What about the Army and Air Force?

Sly 08-24-2005 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
BTW what prompted the question?

Airek started a thread asking for veterans to post... I have a million other questions, I'll save those for a later day. :-)

johnnyhey 08-24-2005 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
The Marines have their own ships?

What about the Army and Air Force?

uh, yeah, how else do you think they can launch amphibious landings?
they're not on the scale of a a carrier or battleship, but they have ships.
army and air force don't have ships.

Sly 08-24-2005 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyhey
uh, yeah, how else do you think they can launch amphibious landings?
they're not on the scale of a a carrier or battleship, but they have ships.
army and air force don't have ships.

I just assumed they used Navy ships.

Ok, now a history question relating to D-Day... when they stormed the beaches, was it mainly Army or were the Marines in there as well? And who's ships did they use?

These are probably odd questions, my mind is spinning now.

EZRhino 08-24-2005 11:12 AM

The biggest difference between the AF and a Naval Air is that Air Force provides a greater haevy lifting capacity to support a forward position or occupation of a established base. Heavy lifting meaning greater bomb pay loads and greater logistical support. However Navy and Marine air wings are setup to be on the offensive, move fast and establish a beach head or forward position. This does not require huge aircraft. But dont be fooled every Expeditionary force (supported by a carrier group) carries enough men and supplies to sustain a prolong compaign.
Eventual the Air Force and Army are needed for occupation and logistics.
I could go on, I hope this helps.

EZRhino 08-24-2005 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
I just assumed they used Navy ships.

Ok, now a history question relating to D-Day... when they stormed the beaches, was it mainly Army or were the Marines in there as well? And who's ships did they use?

These are probably odd questions, my mind is spinning now.

D-Day realting to Normandy it was primarily US Army in Navy LST's and landing craft. Most if not all Marines were in the South Pacific conducting our own D-Day's up and down the South Pacific.

theking 08-24-2005 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by johnnyhey
the marines generally don't use the navy flattops, they have their own ships to launch their air assaults. that's why the marines use the harrier jump jet, because they don't have full size carriers like the navy. the marines don't rely on ANYONE else, they provide ground AND air. that's the way they like it. :)

The ships used by Marines are Navy ships and are operated by Navy personnel. The Marines fly more than the Harrier's.

johnnyhey 08-24-2005 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
I just assumed they used Navy ships.

Ok, now a history question relating to D-Day... when they stormed the beaches, was it mainly Army or were the Marines in there as well? And who's ships did they use?

These are probably odd questions, my mind is spinning now.

http://www.paylesstax.com/images/ima...ft_carrier.jpg
here's an image, as you can see it's significantly smaller than a full size aircraft carrier. that's why they use the harrier. the marines also use f-18's (blue angels planes) that are launched from full size carriers (navy)

sperbonzo 08-24-2005 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
I just assumed they used Navy ships.

Ok, now a history question relating to D-Day... when they stormed the beaches, was it mainly Army or were the Marines in there as well? And who's ships did they use?

These are probably odd questions, my mind is spinning now.

I believe that almost every unit on the US beaches in Normandy were Army. Marines were mostly used in the Pacific Theater.

There were 5000 ships used, and they used everything that could carry troops and equipment. Mostly it was US and British Navy, but they commandered all kinds of ships for that operation

theking 08-24-2005 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly
I just assumed they used Navy ships.

Ok, now a history question relating to D-Day... when they stormed the beaches, was it mainly Army or were the Marines in there as well? And who's ships did they use?

These are probably odd questions, my mind is spinning now.

You assumed correctly.

Army...zero Marines...Navy ships. In addition in the Pacific theater the Army made as many if not more beach invasions than the Marines did.

theking 08-24-2005 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EZRhino
The biggest difference between the AF and a Naval Air is that Air Force provides a greater haevy lifting capacity to support a forward position or occupation of a established base. Heavy lifting meaning greater bomb pay loads and greater logistical support. However Navy and Marine air wings are setup to be on the offensive, move fast and establish a beach head or forward position. This does not require huge aircraft. But dont be fooled every Expeditionary force (supported by a carrier group) carries enough men and supplies to sustain a prolong compaign.
Eventual the Air Force and Army are needed for occupation and logistics.
I could go on, I hope this helps.

Good critique.

Linkster 08-24-2005 12:02 PM

One point on the carrriers and who is protecting who - the carriers are part of a large battle group that includes the air wing stationed on board (and other support air wings like sub chasers and radar planes etc), the protection ships like attack subs and a large assortment of destroyers, cruisers etc. There is also typically a set of support ships for replenishment of supplies. Dependant on the missions there may also be a Marine deployment of ships in concert with the Navy's group for ground forces if it is that type of operation.

The group of ships including the subs, the carrier itself, the destroyers and cruisers and the air wings all work together for protection - of course the primary mission of the carrier is to be the platform for the launching of air attacks, wheras the subs may be primarily to scout and protect the carrier (or in some cases to provide for special ops insertion)

A little about the D Day invasion - it actually started the night before with the combined air forces (UK and US) bombing inland and dropping paratroopers behind enemy lines.
Early in the landing on the beaches the first group in was the scouts and UDT experts who basically were the spec ops people that cleared much of the traps, mines and walls with explosives before the landing (a side note - later after the war these groups were all combined into one Navy group called the SEALS)
Then the combined Allied Expeditionary Force which was a combination of US, UK and Canadians armies were brought ashore for the battles supported by the engineers and other groups - the amphibious vessels were brought in by Navy ships but "belonged" to the armies - actually one of the biggest problems they had was with the amphib. tanks - they tried to drop them in too early and most sank with their crews.
Over 4000 ships took part in the invasions with the USS Augusta as the flagship carrying the Admiral and Gen Omar Bradley - I used to have old photos as my stepdad (long deceased and actually ex now LOL) was the Exec Officer on the Augusta - Ill see if I can find them

Anthony 08-24-2005 12:13 PM

EZRhino hit it on the nose.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123