GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Let them drink Shit

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Let them drink Shit - G.W.Bush (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=502477)

Let them drink Shit - G.W.Bush

In order to save money, so that rich people can get their special tax breaks, George W. Bush has decided that it's most effiecient to let big loads of shit flow out into America's supplies of drinking water every now and then. He has actually ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to allow for the mixing of shit into America's public sources of drinking water. Bush and his friends call this process "blending".

http://irregulartimes.com/drinkshit.html

Fucking idiot. Tell your mom & dad to stop drinking toxic waste and spring for the Night Train or the Thunderbird :2 cents:

rate my poo now accepting river pics lol

The water that comes out of shit plants is actually cleaner then the water that comes out of your tap !

that is one of the most stupid ideas i've ever heard :Oh crap

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster

The water that comes out of shit plants is actually cleaner then the water that comes out of your tap !

Look someone with a clue.

Damn people, I really hate this guy to but not everything he does is the work of the devil or sheer stupidity. This is nothing new at all really and it is perfectly safe and sanitary.

eh, oh well. he has been making us eat shit for years, might as well make us drink shit too.

guess i will just buy a couple more brita filters and drink more beer. :glugglug

see i also don't see a date or a source for that article, and i can't find it on cnn. i'm gonna keep looking though.

ya know, trust, but verify.

well then, it is true.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...kVEjz:e137643:

Quote:

Mr. STUPAK. Mr. Chairman, our amendment would stop the EPA from moving forward with a dangerous proposal that would allow more partially treated sewage into our waterways. This morning the EPA issued a statement saying it will not finalize its current proposal. The EPA has been mulling over this policy change for nearly 2 years.

I am pleased to see that the EPA has now recognized that this policy proposal is bad for our health, bad for our environment, and bad for business. Now Congress needs to seal the deal by passing our amendment to make sure this misguided proposal is gone for good.

Let me clarify something that has been misunderstood. Our amendment will not cost a thing. It will not change a thing. It leaves things just the way they are right now.

Currently, clean water rules say during major wet weather events, sewage treatment plants are allowed to combine the filtered but untreated human sewage with fully treated waste water before discharge, in a process known as ``blending ,'' when no other feasible alternative exists.

The EPA's 2003 proposal would weaken current environmental standards by allowing facilities to discharge largely untreated sewage virtually anytime it rains. Our amendment simply stops the EPA from weakening existing environmental standards and requires that sewage be effectively treated to remove the viruses, parasites, and bacteria that make people sick.

I know many of my colleagues are hearing that this amendment will pose astronomical costs on local communities. That is simply not true. This amendment will not cost communities a dime. Our amendment would maintain the current policy. It would not prevent utilities from blending under any of the current allowable legal circumstances. It would merely support current safeguards which do not allow blending when full treatment is feasible. Let me repeat that. Our amendment will not ban blending .

We have a clear policy choice. Should we provide effective treatment for sewage , remove pollutants that poison drinking water sources, close beaches, contaminate shellfish, make people sick, and rob the water of oxygen the fish need to breathe? Or should we allow routine discharges of inadequately treated sewage virtually every time it rains? To ask the question is to answer it. The choice is clear just as it has been under the Clean Water Act for the past 30 years.

Congress needs to send a strong, clear message on behalf of our constituents. We do not want human waste in the water we drink and swim in. As a step in the right direction, vote ``yes'' on the bipartisan Stupak/Shaw/Pallone/Miller amendment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by smack

well then, it is true.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...kVEjz:e137643:

you doubted the interweb lol?

Quote:

Originally Posted by thaifan99

you doubted the interweb lol?

me, no never. :1orglaugh

sounds like a shitty idea..

now I believe that Bush is the real terrorist.

Ain't that a bunch of shit?

Look at London, they say the water there has been passed through the waste system at least 4 times, its nothing new.

Damn, shits are for sale now?!