TreasonGate... Will shit hit the fan in a MAJOR way!?
 

Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rice, Gonzalez, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Card, Scalia, Renquist all getting arrested for treason..?

http://www.democraticunderground.com...c_id=19915 61

Too good to be true..? We shall see.. :tongue:

The story is all over Blogs...

Maybee a bit too early for this ,"Merry Early Christmas to you all!!!" but time will tell :2 cents:

Here's something else about why Judith Miller went to prison:

"Tatel actually found that reason and experience 'support recognition of a privilege for reporters' confidential sources'. But Tatel still ordered Cooper and Miller to testify because he found that the privilege had to give way to 'the gravity of the suspected crime'. "

Judge Tatel?s opinion has eight blank pages in the middle of it where he discusses the secret information the prosecutor has supplied only to the judges to convince them that the testimony he is demanding is worth sending reporters to jail to get. The gravity of the suspected crime is presumably very well developed in those redacted pages. Later, Tatel refers to [h]aving carefully scrutinized [the prosecutor?s] voluminous classified filings...

Tatel wrote a 41-page opinion in which he seemed eager to make new law -- a federal reporters? shield law -- but in the end, he couldn?t bring himself to do it in this particular case. In his final paragraph, he says he 'might have' let Cooper and Miller off the hook '[w]ere the leak at issue in this case less harmful to national security.'

Tatel?s colleagues are at least as impressed with the prosecutor?s secret filings as he is. One simply said 'Special Counsel?s showing decides the case.'

All the judges who have seen the prosecutor?s secret evidence firmly believe he is pursuing a very serious crime, and they have done everything they can to help him get an indictment."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblo...son-_3769.html

Also an interesting read:
http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/200...aw-part-2.html

Bush will pardon himself.

Wow, your country is so shitty and boring you have to join message boards for political parties in other countries you can't even join. I feel sorry for you.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

hoax......

lol idiot.. Im not a member of that board nor do I usually read that board... Here's an idea.. could I had found that page by clicking a link somewhere.!?

:helpme

sounds like you were surfing GLP.

:2 cents:

GLP ?


.........

Board full of whacko conspiracy theorists.

has a higher entertainment value than here.

Food for tought...

"War on Terror" was changed for "Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism" lol..

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/...in712317.shtml


Could it be because of this:

"THE MYSTERY OF "GSAVE" IN "TIME OF WAR"

And finally we come to the statement from 794(b), "in time of war." 794(b) only kicks in if we are in "a time of war." According to the vote by Congress authorizing the war in Iraq, and the Bush administration's words and actions in projecting that war, we are certainly in a time of war at least as far back as March 19, 2003, when we invaded Iraq, but according to the President, war was declared by the enemy on September 11, 2001.

In light of this, "in time of war" requirement from 794(b), it's extremely interesting to note the strange public relations circus emanating from Washington regarding the proposed acronym "GSAVE" which has apparently taken over for "GWOT".

GSAVE = Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism

GWOT = Global War Against Terror

Could it be that the Bush administration will start spinning that we were not in a time of war when Rove and others in the Bush administration outed Plame and her team so as to prepare a defense to coming indictments under 794(b) by Patrick Fitzgerald's grand jury?

If we are in a time of war, those involved with outing Valerie Plame and her network are eligible to be prosecuted under 794(b) and therefore are subject to the death penalty.

It's no wonder our plight has shifted from a "war on terror" to a "struggle against violent extremism."

Look for the Bush administration to make the argument that the Iraq war ended on or about May 1, 2003, the day Bush landed on the USS Lincoln and declared victory over the enemy."

http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/200...aw-part-2.html

A conspiracy? Dude.. this is a rumour that is going around.. and getting alot of buzz.. We will know soon enough if its true or not.. Should have a Newsweek story about it soon... we'll see.