GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Sex Offenders BANNED from storm shelters (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=500989)

SmokeyTheBear 08-07-2005 10:16 PM

Sex Offenders BANNED from storm shelters
 
hahahha so owned

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050807/...ers_hurricanes

They will be given shelter at any prison instead , no joke..


-------------------------------

Sex Offenders Banned From Storm Shelters Sun Aug 7, 5:00 PM ET



ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - Sex offenders tracked by the state are banned from public hurricane shelters in Florida under a new policy that allows them to weather the storms in prison instead.


The policy was created to keep sex offenders and predators away from children, said Robby Cunningham, spokesman for the Department of Corrections. Offenders who go to a prison will stay in areas such as visitor or meeting rooms, he said.

"They are not incarcerated," Cunningham said Saturday. "We don't want them on the streets. We don't want them violating their probation either."

The policy only affects sex offenders under state supervision who are not allowed near children. They can go to a prison if their evacuation address given to authorities can't be used or is deemed unacceptable, Cunningham said. He did not know how many sex offenders could be affected.

The policy took effect at the beginning of hurricane season, June 1. Six offenders stayed in prisons during Hurricane Dennis in July.

Sex offenders have to sign a form that outlines instructions, wear an ID badge, and they can be searched by authorities at any time.

Randall Marshall, legal director of the Florida ACLU, said the policy could push sex offenders out of the supervision of authorities.

"If you take people who have served their sentence and are released from prison and try to (reinstate) themselves in society, the more steps you take to isolate and ostracize them ... there are very few options for them to live their lives and not reoffend," he said.

CaptainHowdy 08-07-2005 10:24 PM

Hola Smokey, Hola...

xclusive 08-07-2005 10:24 PM

thats great news actually

mardigras 08-07-2005 10:25 PM

I've not seen any shelters where they might have an opportunity. Oh well, at least they have a place to go if they wanna.

SmokeyTheBear 08-07-2005 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xclusive
thats great news actually

:thumbsup :thumbsup

iwantchixx 08-08-2005 12:14 AM

the way I see it, is once you serve your time. You're human again. If they are that worried that an offender is going to reoffend, maybe the juducial system failed to restitute the man and should just throw the man back in jail again until he's restituted and treated.

SmokeyTheBear 08-08-2005 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantchixx
the way I see it, is once you serve your time. You're human again. If they are that worried that an offender is going to reoffend, maybe the juducial system failed to restitute the man and should just throw the man back in jail again until he's restituted and treated.

You have a point. But i have a quick solution..

Any cp sex offense includes a minimum life's probation included with any judgement.

So then technically they dont ever serve their time, its much more fitting.

PixeLs 08-08-2005 12:41 AM

Looks like another stormy day for these poor people..lol

je_rome 08-08-2005 01:06 AM

that is included on the price they have to pay for being sex offenders.

kmanrox 08-08-2005 01:10 AM

and the police wont EVEN give me a ride to the PRISON!!! FUCKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

wdforty 08-08-2005 01:23 AM

That's awesome... :thumbsup:

reed_4 08-08-2005 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hedonistic
and the police wont EVEN give me a ride to the PRISON!!! FUCKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :321GFY
hey dude your sig rocks :1orglaugh

Wiggles 08-08-2005 04:29 AM

sounds good to me, would likely molest someone at a shelter.

Sam Granger 08-08-2005 04:47 AM

They should shoot them instead.

Manowar 08-08-2005 04:47 AM

they brought it on themselves

mardigras 08-08-2005 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiggles
sounds good to me, would likely molest someone at a shelter.

Yeah, down here at shelters during a hurricane people usually stand around in a circle clapping while people fuck.

Fletch XXX 08-08-2005 06:15 AM

"Sex offenders have to sign a form that outlines instructions, wear an ID badge, and they can be searched by authorities at any time."

sounds like they do their fucking part after they are busted at least.

i mean, why not just say anyone with a criminal past cant be alloowed into hurricane shelters, you know how many RASPISTS are in the shelters?

oh sure, let a rapist go to a shelter but oh no protect the kids.

double ignorant standard that isnt right no matter how you look at it.

id prefer a pedo than a rapist sleeping next to me in a shelter.

and please keep all those blacks and chinks away (showing how easy it is to point th finger) at someone else. Laws like this are no diffeent than blacks cant drinki at white fountains.

why should ANY CRIMINAL be given shelter then? doesnt make sense. if pedos can go to the grocery store why not shelter?

more "for the kids" bullshit is all this is.

Fletch XXX 08-08-2005 06:17 AM

ps - not taking up for pedos, i just dont understand shit like this.

Damian_Maxcash 08-08-2005 06:19 AM

If these people really are that dangerous why arnt they in some sort of facility?

They are either safe to be on the streets or they are not.

Im the last person to preach pedo rights, I think they should be castrated.....

but you cant have one law for them and one for others. If they have served there time then the punishment should stop. It would with everyone else.

Some would argue that pornographers, hookers, gays etc should have the same treatment... you wouldnt want the kiddies minds polluted by these deviants right?

Fletch XXX 08-08-2005 06:21 AM

hell they shouldnt allow muslim looking people in the shelter either.

they could be terrorists.

mardigras 08-08-2005 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
ps - not taking up for pedos, i just dont understand shit like this.

"Feel good" legislation that wins brownie points with conservative voters. Takes little to pass, doesn't really accomplish shit but gives them gives them something to tout at re-election.

Fletch XXX 08-08-2005 06:26 AM

thepart that makes me questions the entire thing is... "this only applies to sex opffenders who shouldnt be around children."

why are woman not regarded as sacred as children?

the last thing id want would be rapists beddding near single moms in shelters, so why do they single out pedos but not "rapists" which are sex offenders as well as others.

anyone who supports shit like this might as well fuck little kids themselves.

Sarah_Jayne 08-08-2005 06:58 AM

I would be more nervous about someone convicted of robbery or pick pocketing.

BuggyG 08-08-2005 07:03 AM

ROFL!!
well it seem sonce in a while.. people in gov't actually do use their heads :thumbsup

mardigras 08-08-2005 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuggyG
ROFL!!
well it seem sonce in a while.. people in gov't actually do use their heads :thumbsup

Well, why don't you add one to this thread, it's lacking :winkwink:

Murderous 08-08-2005 07:19 AM

They should just refuse them shelter altogether... that would take care of them.

Run for your lives... It's raining donuts and dildos out here!

Martina Warren 08-08-2005 07:25 AM

Yeah the only thing is what really is a sex offender? I mean if a guy goes to visit a hooker, and gets caught is that a sex offender? Just watched a episode of cops, where a female police officer was pretending to be a hooker and she was going up to people to offer her services. I think thats pretty bad, in the UK that would be considered entrapment :Oh crap

Just wondering if this guy would get trapped outside to get blown away with the real sickos :1orglaugh

Martina Warren 08-08-2005 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
thepart that makes me questions the entire thing is... "this only applies to sex opffenders who shouldnt be around children."

Oh Ok its late and i didnt see that part. Forget my last post :winkwink:

Dalai lama 08-08-2005 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hedonistic
and the police wont EVEN give me a ride to the PRISON!!! FUCKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

After Shock Media 08-08-2005 09:15 AM

Horay for more bullshit laws.
Fletch already pretty much sumed it up though.

El Duderino 08-08-2005 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
hell they shouldnt allow muslim looking people in the shelter either.

they could be terrorists.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

QuaWee 08-08-2005 09:22 AM

too bad so sad. i so badly hate sex offenders.

SmokeyTheBear 08-08-2005 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damian2001
If these people really are that dangerous why arnt they in some sort of facility?

They are either safe to be on the streets or they are not.

Im the last person to preach pedo rights, I think they should be castrated.....

but you cant have one law for them and one for others. If they have served there time then the punishment should stop. It would with everyone else.

Some would argue that pornographers, hookers, gays etc should have the same treatment... you wouldnt want the kiddies minds polluted by these deviants right?

You and fletch have some good points BUT..

Sexual predators scar their victims for LIFE , their sentance should be no different.

Some might argue as you point out that hookers and gays etc should be given the same treatment , but that isn't what this is about.

Yes i agree that once you finish your sentance you should be let free , BUT i think all sexual offenses should include minimum life's probation , so they never finish their sentance , just like the victims never finish the pain.

SmokeyTheBear 08-08-2005 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
thepart that makes me questions the entire thing is... "this only applies to sex opffenders who shouldnt be around children."

why are woman not regarded as sacred as children?

the last thing id want would be rapists beddding near single moms in shelters, so why do they single out pedos but not "rapists" which are sex offenders as well as others.

anyone who supports shit like this might as well fuck little kids themselves.

Well you started off on a good note , but finished poorly :)

Rapists should be included as well.

To claim anyone who supports kicking child molesters out of storm shelters " might as well fuck little kids themselves" makes no sense ( sorry maybe i'm missing something ? )

Hollywood Horwitz 08-08-2005 10:43 AM

damn,Fletch and damian2001 have said it all,i have nothing else to add..


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123