2257, DOJ witness makes interesting claim
 

from:

http://www.ynot.com/modules.php?op=m...cle &sid=9635

salient point in BOLD:

According to Piccionelli, the FSC was able to poke holes in several of the DOJ?s arguments, and expose significant problems in the language of the amended regulations, and even the government?s own expert witness agreed that certain requirements would be very difficult, if not impossible, for many ?producers? to comply with.

The difficulty of accurately and comprehensively logging session IDs and other dynamically generated locations, maintaining a comprehensive list of URLs for all depictions, and storage of certain types of depictions, were specifically cited as burdensome requiresents for producers.

will be very interesting to see how this plays out.

what's going on with the whole 2257 thing? Are US porn pushers still fucked?

the lawyer says things are looking ok.....Alberto is getting blown away....hearsay though....lawyer said...

Ya it is looking good but who knows for sure. All we can do is hope for the best.

Looking good for us!

Ever hear of a lawyer telling his client(s) that things are looking bad? :1orglaugh


on a side note tho, things seem to be going good, hopefully the new law can be changed to actually do what its supposed to do rather then just put people out of business

Actually, if they manage to pull out all the idiotic parts - and make it a simple question of solid proof of age etc, it may turn out not too be so bad....

any new news?