XBiz News Flash: No Decision in 2257 - Preliminary Injunction
 

No Decision in 2257 Preliminary Injunction Hearing; Judge Takes Evidence Under Advisement

While hopes were high prior to the hearing ? which was first scheduled for Aug. 8 and then switched to Aug. 2 ? that Judge Walker D. Miller would issue a ruling, he instead took all written material under advisement and has an indefinite period of time to make a decision.

Full Report > http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=9793

Can't blam him, there is a lot of material to review.

great coverage and article.

You guys really stay on top of things.

cory..cant wait to sit and chat with you FINALLY at Internext...its long overdue :winkwink:

XBIZ on top of things :thumbsup :thumbsup

As expected from Xbiz
:thumbsup

so they do indeed have a 'hitlist'.

Not only is ther a lot to read, but there is also a learning curve for him. I am sure that he will have a lot to learn about the net, before he can really make an informed decision. Providing he cares.

http://www.whois.sc/sapphicerotica.com

Disturbing that Sapphic isn't even registered to a US company/person and it's on that list.

Thanks for the update!

That could mean one of two things. Either they're poorly informed, or they intend to use the 2257 to influence the hosts and/or .com registry and get sites closed down.

or they intend to go after u.s.-based affiliates.

You guys rock, I look forward to your next physical issue.

More difficult to do than to try getting the program shut down. If they can have their domain name pulled, that would definitely put some non-US sponsors out of business.

Good stuff Stephen! XBiz always a leader. :)

how can they have a domain name pulled if they can't prove the girls are under 18?

I like their almost daily emails..very informative

is there a list of all the websites that are on that cd rom I would be interested in knowing

great work as always xbiz

So fucking check them under existing 2257 regs for fucks sake.

So they're definitely looking at TEEN sites, not just for "young" children but sites with teens that even look like they might be 17.

Are those even USA sites ?

If this passes, they won't have to. YOU should prove they're over 18.

That's what I find so disturbing over these new proposed regs - Guily before proven Innocent.

Thanks for the update, I still thought the hearing was next week.

exactly :disgust






...

even the US banks that still offer merchant accounts for adult shy away from approving sites that push 'teen'. They definately get the fine tooth comb treatment