![]() |
Anyone else noticed that Mainstream DVD porn sucks?
I watched a bunch of stuff on the weekend and i swear to god I couldn't get hard to it if i tried. All fucking tricky video editing like it's a fucking music video... two licks of a cock in slo-mo - transition - panning down a bunch of flesh and boobs - transition - back to girls doing their best not to actually suck cock in horrible slow motion.
Two lesbians in a very detailed ancient roman scene kinda don't do much and do it really quickly... lots of nicely edited graphics. blearg. shitty video editing sucking any life and enjoyment out of seeing women suck cock by making it desperately arty. /rant (yes i realise the majority of it doesn't suck.) |
better then a lot of the shot for web shit out there. and there are a lot of sites surviving off dvd content.
|
Quote:
I'd rather something badly shot as long as it got the essential horny bits in and focus on the sex than special effects and arty editing adding a layer that distances you from the porn. |
I agree with you, since i run a adult dvd rental site i watch all the new stuff when it comes out and they are screwing up alot of the good dvd's with overboard editing. Its not a hard thing to produce, guy meets girl, girl sucks guys dick, guy eats girl out, he fucks he, then he sticks it in her ass(sometimes) then a pop shot. Sounds pretty easy to me yet alot of these guys think its Art and try tricky camera work or editing. Go figure, if i wanna jerk off i wanna see enough of a scene to be able to do it.
|
I review tons of DVDs, most of it sucks.
Most porn directors and editors try to be too creative and artistic, they forget the purpose of porn is for men (and some women) to jerk off to. When I shoot stuff myself, I just capture good sex, and I edit it very simply. And I use royalty free music from www.AdultIndustryMusic.com |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123