![]() |
Whats up with all the solo girl sites nowadays
Even the most ugly chicks get a site dedicated to them now...
I mean, you have lightspeed girls & ftvcash & teenrevenue chicks for example which are hot, but sometimes I see chicks have a site dedicated to them that normally would only be a member area filler. I am not here to bash any sites directly, but what's up with this hype? :helpme |
|
Although I agree some of the girls haven't been anything to write home about, the single girl market is about having a connection with the customers/fans. Maybe some of these average hunnies will be willing to ride it out a little longer instead of pulling the vanishing act that plagues 99% of this industry, and any industry dependant on young adults for work.
I guess in a 6 months we can revisting any of these new sites to see how they're doing.and see if there really is a market for solo girl outside of the ultra hot teen/ esablished single model site. I would say there is, since niches keep breaking off into sub niches. Pretty soon there will be sites devoted strictly to girls, for example "Asian, Strawberry blone hair, dark skin, 32/24/32. 5'0", no tattoos, wearing white outfits, , 19, with size 4 feet and blue painted nails (o.k., that's just my fetish :) ) I can say I've never considered any of the Lightspeed girls as amazingly beautiful, but that's just my opinion. Doing overture search on any of their names versus anyone outside of Jenna Jameson or Tera Patrick will quickly prove my taste out of the majority. But I don't think these sites will make a substantional amount of cash, unless they are marketed like crazy. But the retention on the site would do well, provided the model sticks around and doesn't jump the shark. |
Quote:
And I think you are right about the retention. If somebody really likes a chick they see, I guess they might tend to stay around for a while. |
Single girl sites are all about selling the fantasy of the girl next door. That hot chick from just down the road who guys always fantasise about but never get close to. Single girl sites offer people a chance to make a connection with a girl like that and lets face it who wouldnt want to make a connection with a girl like this
0.02 http://www.lunascam.com/jscott1.jpg |
Whatever you think of Kirste'ns Room, it does convert and has been around for a few years. She's not fugly, but she's not hot either.
|
|
Quote:
|
The single girl site thing is a fad. Lightspeed is the only one that retains for me. Very few guys are going to stay for 6 months at one single girl site. She has to give GFE to do that.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think the solo girl market is hot right now .. there are a lot of guys out there that don't just want to be able to beat off to a girl but feel like he knows her. It's not always how hot she is ...some times it's the fact that he thinks that he could get her. that's why you see these ugly girls with cams that make tons of cash ... the guys feel like they can get her ..
wanted to say more ... had a full thought about it ....but I'm shot today . :( |
click my sig... its all about solo girls ;)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
solo girl is also an easier reality site to replicate. normal "reality" sites are based around new concepts, with solo girls, the girl is the concept. So take any girl you think can sell, and make it happen.
think its alot easier than coming up with new concepts, might have something to do with the abundance of Solo Girl sites. see sig :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not the case really. The single girl market has been hot as hell since 2002 and most of the 2002 sites are still around and doing well. Sure, some drop off here and there, but its more because of the model then it is the site owner. Lots of flaky teen models you know. I will agree its a "fad" for the "kids", with no budget to get into webmastering quick. Those, unless the girl is really special do fall of quick. They think they can just throw up a site and it will convert are retain. I have not seen to many of those lately though. Most are getting it and doing the right thing. Any webmaster that opens a solo site without at least 100 sets of images, and 8 hours of video under his belt will be part of the fad you are talking about..... "gone in 6 months". You have to have at least a year of updates, doing two updates a week to really do the solo site thing right. Take http://www.alyssadoll.com She opened her site with 48 sets and an hour of video on day one. Her webmaster has enough content up and above the first 48 sets to update with a new set every week and a new video every week. All of it shot upfront before the site went live. No needs to worry on flaky models or running out of content. The site will retain forever with steady updates like that. Anyways, the solo site surge of late is no fad with the exception of the webmasters throwing up 20 sets and never updating.... they will be gone very soon. |
people are sheep and people look for the easiest route to riches. 90% of the single girl sites you see launched on GFY will do less than 5 sales a day.
Now if you have 20 sites X 5 sales a day - that works - but you better have top notch girls or you won't get much traffic. i haven't seen a star single girl site launched since Raven Riley - oh - and the one in my sig :winkwink: it's tough as hell finding girls who stand out above the crowd. so i expect to see lots more average looking single girl sites launched until it finally sinks in that success with a single girl site is a long shot. Unless you have lots of single girl site traffic of your own - then you're laughing - you don't need stars then, not a big difference in conversion ratios between girls really - rebills yes, the better the site, more content = better rebills. Ashley's rebills are on the increase as her members area content has grown - she's up to 90 photosets and movies now plus her own Windows Media server for her weekly webcam show which is now only available to her members - members like that - it's more intimate for them. |
"it's tough as hell finding girls who stand out above the crowd. so i expect to see lots more average looking single girl sites launched until it finally sinks in that success with a single girl site is a long shot. Unless you have lots of single girl site traffic of your own - then you're laughing - you don't need stars then, not a big difference in conversion ratios between girls really - rebills yes, the better the site, more content = better rebills. Ashley's rebills are on the increase as her members area content has grown - she's up to 90 photosets and movies now plus her own Windows Media server for her weekly webcam show which is now only available to her members - members like that - it's more intimate for them."
And what Mutt said. |
Quote:
|
girl friend experience
|
http://www.tawneestone.com/daily/th/t4.jpghttp://www.dirtyaly.com/daily/th/t4.jpghttp://www.jordancapri.com/daily/th/r2.jpghttp://www.britneylightspeed.com/daily/th/t4.jpghttp://www.mandylightspeed.com/daily/th/t4.jpghttp://www.danalightspeed.com/daily/th/t5.jpghttp://www.stacybride.com/daily/th/r2.jpghttp://www.dirtyaly.com/daily/th/t6.jpg
Solo girls are 2001-2003, now its all about the NETWORK |
Quote:
:thumbsup Yep its all about the girl next door. |
Quote:
|
Do people in the solo girl market find that it's getting saturated?
|
Quote:
I do agree, that the network helps! |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
We shoot all of our girls upfront for a year or two*(then updates if needed)..so there's no chance of "model flaking" to make the site go down.
Most of our sites are NN or topless http://pixiespillows.com http://mandymichaels.com http://kelliyoung.com http://brandyddd.com http://haleysummers.com |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
People with too much money and no brains
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Go run a few teen tgps and you will see how little there really still is out there. I run a couple teen solo site tgps as well as shoot teen solo site content. The market isnt even close to being saturated. The list of good teen solo sites is still under 20-30. Run a tgp and you will see how few that is. I could be 4 times that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:( |
Some of those 'ugly' amateur girls make more money then a lot here do.
|
Quote:
Not sure what you are referring to? Alyssadoll? Its only been up two days and its very, very naked. |
The first porn sites on the net were solo girl sites, just called "amateur" back then. Carol Cox, Jen & Dave, Venus, Jenni Cam...they were the original single girl sites back in 1995/96. I'm surprised so many GFY webmasters think this is a new phenomenon.
At least the cookie cutter solo sites that are cropping up every day will probably do well to boost real amateur girl retention. Girls like Vanilla & Allie who do regular cam shows & interact with their members plus have years worth of content will stand out from the girls who shot with a webmaster for a couple of months & then flaked. |
Soio Girl sites are just imitiations of amateur sites which does not need networks or groups of people to share in the profit .. we will always rock on :)
QUOTE=Lightspeed]Solo girls are 2001-2003, now its all about the NETWORK[/QUOTE] |
Quote:
|
that luna braud is bangin! :eek2
.. |
Mutt, you said above that you have to have a smoking hot girl. As a person promoting webcams for years I 100% disagree.
|
Let's not confuse 'solo girl sites' with 'amateur sites'. NaughtyAllie, Sammy4u, VanillaDeville, Wifeysworld, BustyRachel, etc are in a class of their own!
RavenRiley and AshleyBrookes are also in the amateur category I think, since the girls are personally involved in the marketing and operation of their sites. Solo girl sites on the other hand, (without livecams) better offer something to retain members besides a cute girl getting naked. |
ask LS said, solo girls with no web cam shows are completely toasted if you ask me
|
thanks for the positive comments regarding luna :)
For those wondering there are currently 50 sets 20+ videos online and the affiliate program still has yet to officially launch. We are accepting traffic from those who want to promote her but will not be rushed into releasing an affiliate program that sucks and expecting people to promote the site. Ive been around since 99 and like many people have pointed out there are too many solo girl sites that are lacking in content at launch and that has a hugely negative effect on rebills as well as consumer confidence. A surfer who has been stung by signing up for a 30$ site for 10 sets will be more wary in future of buying further memberships to other sites. For this reason it annoys me when webmasters flock to the latest and greatest site which in many cases is little more than a pimp tour and a woefully lacking members area. With Luna we have a girl who loves the interaction with members and actively seeks their requests and suggestions for ideas and more importantly follows up on them almost immediately. If anyone is interested in promoting then feel free to hit me up on ICQ 30243477 or signup via my sig. As far as my recommendations for other single girl sites I would say it doesnt get much better than Kates Playground. Matt has done an unbelievable job with this site and in fact all of the other sites in the spunkycash network. Huge amounts of content, excellent interaction and designs that are not only very easy to navigate but also visually appealing. Retention in general is good and excellent when compared with many other single girl sites. There is also a demand from affiliates for single girl sites to promote, the girls are often hotter than the girls available on multimodel sites and so prove very popular with tgp webmasters AND submitters. A pretty face can make all the difference when it comes to getting a high ranking thumbnail. sorry for rambling on but I thought id elaborate on a few things. 0.02 0.02 |
Quote:
|
lol yep shes hot
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123