GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Al-Qaida's U.S. nuclear targets (captured documents) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=498120)

TTiger 07-30-2005 01:21 PM

Al-Qaida's U.S. nuclear targets (captured documents)
 
captured documents, terrorists reveal bin Laden's preferred dates, places for 'American Hiroshima'

Al-Qaida's prime targets for launching nuclear terrorist attacks are the nine U.S. cities with the highest Jewish populations, according to captured leaders and documents.

As first revealed last week in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by the founder of WND, Osama bin Laden is planning what he calls an "American Hiroshima," the ultimate terrorist attack on U.S. cities, using nuclear weapons already smuggled into the country across the Mexican border along with thousands of sleeper agents

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=45313

Chio The Pirate 07-30-2005 01:26 PM

YARGH! I be ready!


p1mpdogg 07-30-2005 01:45 PM

sweet

can not wait to see this shit go down. i want front row seats


im putting on some tool to celebrate!

p1mpdogg 07-30-2005 01:46 PM

Aenema!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

dready 07-30-2005 01:49 PM

Interesting read.

JD 07-30-2005 01:58 PM

that's some scary shit right there. I'm glad I don't live in one of those 9 cities.

NaughtyRob 07-30-2005 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p1mpdogg
Aenema!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Donny 07-30-2005 02:01 PM

The cities chosen as optimal targets are New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Boston and Washington, D.C. New York and Washington top the preferred target list for al-Qaida leadership.

Morgan 07-30-2005 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
The cities chosen as optimal targets are New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Boston and Washington, D.C. New York and Washington top the preferred target list for al-Qaida leadership.

sounds like bin ladin is working with bush to try and stop porn.

Hustlin Entertainment 07-30-2005 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TTiger
captured documents, terrorists reveal bin Laden's preferred dates, places for 'American Hiroshima'

Al-Qaida's prime targets for launching nuclear terrorist attacks are the nine U.S. cities with the highest Jewish populations, according to captured leaders and documents.

As first revealed last week in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence newsletter published by the founder of WND, Osama bin Laden is planning what he calls an "American Hiroshima," the ultimate terrorist attack on U.S. cities, using nuclear weapons already smuggled into the country across the Mexican border along with thousands of sleeper agents

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=45313

Funny how for months they have stated Al-Qaeda does not posess nuclear capabilites, now all of a sudden they do,right before he is supposed to renew the patriot act, as the saying goes, When you have a Bush and a Dick In Office, The Whole World is getting FUCKED.

strats 07-30-2005 02:13 PM

would you guys like to care to the fact that in alaska here, there is a missle base with nuclear warheads in it, many of them and there are many possible routes into alaska, the road has only small patrol boots at the missle stations,... .... Yes, there are two airforce bases and some thousands of troops in alaska, but the fact that this location, hundreds of miles from cities, is too vulnerable (imo

azguy 07-30-2005 02:14 PM

Already discussed 2 weeks ago

fucking-around-and-business-discussion/493748-al-qaidas-nuclear-targets.html

MrPinks 07-30-2005 03:07 PM

Pretty fucking scary article. But isn't that their goal? To scare us. Honestly, they should have caught that motherfucker by now.

aleck 07-30-2005 03:18 PM

do they need more freedom to take from americans? why would otherwise they'll publish such b/s? reminds me of WMD in Iraq.

VeriSexy 07-30-2005 03:25 PM

Billions of dollars spent and still no Bin Laden :Oh crap WTF!!!

mardigras 07-30-2005 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azguy

C'mon, surely you kid an article only 12 days old on a topic of this magnitude has already made it to GFY :upsidedow

Thomas1007 07-30-2005 03:27 PM

scary shit if this is true
bin-laden with nukes isnt a good scenario
:helpme :error

More Booze 07-30-2005 03:28 PM

Hmmm... I better download a full serverbackup then. :P

Rochard 07-30-2005 03:36 PM

Let any one set off a nuke on US soil and watch what happens. Why would any one want to put all of their effort into setting off a nuke on US soil when the US can respond instantly by pushing a button.

The attacks on 9/11 resulted in two countries being over-run by the US. If a nuke was to go off on US soil the entire Middle East would become a rather large glass parking lot.

MrPinks 07-30-2005 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocHard
Let any one set off a nuke on US soil and watch what happens. Why would any one want to put all of their effort into setting off a nuke on US soil when the US can respond instantly by pushing a button.

The attacks on 9/11 resulted in two countries being over-run by the US. If a nuke was to go off on US soil the entire Middle East would become a rather large glass parking lot.

For some reason, I doubt that. After 911 everyone thought we would blow the shit out of where ever we thought Bin Laden might be. Didn't happen. America is too afraid of hurting innocent victims.

JD 07-30-2005 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrPinks
For some reason, I doubt that. After 911 everyone thought we would blow the shit out of where ever we thought Bin Laden might be. Didn't happen. America is too afraid of hurting innocent victims.

innocent victims? yeah....ok. 9 nuclear strikes and multiple attacks at malls n shit would make 9/11 look like a fucking joke. instead of a few thousand people dieing several MILLIONS of people would die.

IMHO the US WILL retaliate agaisnt them with nukes in any country that allows them to operate.

basschick 07-30-2005 04:36 PM

if they were already in this country, and put there by terrorists with no national affiliations - um, how would we know where to send our nukes?

rickholio 07-30-2005 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by basschick
if they were already in this country, and put there by terrorists with no national affiliations - um, how would we know where to send our nukes?

Exactly. 12 out of the 15 from 9/11 were from the land of Saud. You honestly think they're gonna nuke Saudi Arabia?

Keep dreaming. That'd be like getting stabbed, then sticking your OWN knife in and jiggling it around just to make sure the wound is fatal.

And what happens if the perps are a couple white guys from Oklahoma? Do you nuke OK city, Tulsa and maybe Lawton "just to be sure"? Don't claim it couldn't happen... It already has.

No, what'll happen in ANY of these situations is that a random enemy only tangentally related to the perps (if at all) will be declared and summarily executed for no reason greater than to make people feel better, most likely brown people as they seem to be the cathartic slaughter targets of choice lately. Which, of course, would feed the goal of a terrorist very well... what better way to get the world pissed off with the US than drawing the reactionary assholes in the administration (or at least the ones left over) into an ill-advised 'retaliation' against a population totally innocent of any involvement? The recruitment posters pretty much write themselves.

rickholio 07-30-2005 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrPinks
For some reason, I doubt that. After 911 everyone thought we would blow the shit out of where ever we thought Bin Laden might be. Didn't happen. America is too afraid of hurting innocent victims.

Evidently you missed the daisy-cutter action in afghanistan?

Perhaps it was as rumsfeld claimed: "There's no good targets in Afghanistan." :disgust

MrPinks 07-30-2005 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickholio
Evidently you missed the daisy-cutter action in afghanistan?

Perhaps it was as rumsfeld claimed: "There's no good targets in Afghanistan." :disgust

I didn't miss shit. I am just saying that we wouldn't retaliate with nukes. Besides, we would be to busy trying to get our own shit together. Hopefully, this shit never happens but there has been way too much talk about it over the last year or two.

johnnyhey 07-30-2005 07:17 PM

i don't know about you fucking nOObs, but worldnetdaily.com is where i get ALL my news.

aleck 07-31-2005 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RocHard
The attacks on 9/11 resulted in two countries being over-run by the US..

was it helpful?

angelsofporn 07-31-2005 08:06 AM

learn to swim..learn to swim...

Fletch XXX 07-31-2005 08:11 AM

i would have zero problem with blowing up malls.

they are filled with teenagers and salesman.

two things the world needs less of

Fred Quimby 07-31-2005 08:17 AM

I'm in NY,,,so I'll say my good byes now

bye bye

Buzz 07-31-2005 08:23 AM

I would'nt believe to anybody having a guy named DICK as a vice president

Shoehorn! 07-31-2005 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ganjasaurus
sounds like bin ladin is working with bush to try and stop porn.

:1orglaugh

Basic_man 07-31-2005 08:26 AM

God damn, that's pretty scary ! If I woud live in one of those city, I would move very fast !

Buzz 07-31-2005 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
i would have zero problem with blowing up malls.

they are filled with teenagers and salesman.

two things the world needs less of

awww leave teenagers alone!
If you kill 'em all, who do you think will pose for camera?

the whole world plunges into the abyss of mature sex paysites .... :1orglaugh

aleck 07-31-2005 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Basic_man
God damn, that's pretty scary ! If I woud live in one of those city, I would move very fast !

good timing to get some real estate in these cities then :1orglaugh

thaifan99 07-31-2005 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VeriSexy
Billions of dollars spent and still no Bin Laden :Oh crap WTF!!!

Send the british police after him!

jigg 07-31-2005 09:55 AM

anything on WorldNet Daily should be taken with a grain of salt

Redrob 07-31-2005 10:15 AM

Damn.....there goes my vacation plans..

Doctor Dre 07-31-2005 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonovanPhillips
The cities chosen as optimal targets are New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, Las Vegas, Boston and Washington, D.C. New York and Washington top the preferred target list for al-Qaida leadership.

I could probably have guessed the name of the cities on the list ... could be any1 with 2 bit of logic that wrote that .

Doctor Dre 07-31-2005 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hustlin Entertainment
Funny how for months they have stated Al-Qaeda does not posess nuclear capabilites, now all of a sudden they do,right before he is supposed to renew the patriot act, as the saying goes, When you have a Bush and a Dick In Office, The Whole World is getting FUCKED.

Patriot act was renewed wasn't it ?

Doctor Dre 07-31-2005 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrPinks
Pretty fucking scary article. But isn't that their goal? To scare us. Honestly, they should have caught that motherfucker by now.

They don't let people see the true pictures of the war but they tell everybody that alquaida have nuclear weapons ? we see the tactic now ... lol

zipprice 07-31-2005 12:19 PM

i think us residents must back up the HDS :)

tristan_D 08-01-2005 12:25 AM

even if that's unconfirmed, that is just scary.

KRL 08-01-2005 12:55 AM

Anyway you look at it everyone here will be dead in 80 years or less regardless.

:( :1orglaugh

reynold 08-01-2005 06:35 AM

Pray that won't be happening.

Rinaldo 08-01-2005 07:52 AM

I question the validity of those reports

TheLegacy 08-01-2005 07:55 AM

Mexico has nukes?? LOL

aleck 08-01-2005 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rinaldo
I question the validity of those reports

As valid as reports on Iraq's WMD I guess, i.e. "Valid until further notice".

reynold 08-01-2005 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy
Mexico has nukes?? LOL

I guess they only have them for safekeeping..OMG.

BlueDesignStudios 08-01-2005 07:30 PM

49............


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123