Why haven't the Brits attacked an unrelated country yet?
 

Isn't that the "in" thing now-adays. I think Argentina would be a good target to get revenge for those terrorist acts.....or maybe Brazil.

lmao...do they have oil there?

They will take out china.. they need more Chinese Thee

don't you have a caribou to fuck?

We only take out people that appear to be a threat.

I have 100% respect for what those officers did.. the officer that was on TV today explaining why they did what they did, and why they shot him in the head was just 100% honest - good to se they dont try to cover anything up...

we "have" Iraq's oil and prices just keep going higher and higher ...nice job Bush now the world is paying for your blunders

How do you know they arent covering anything up?

</ebus_dk> <drama>bla.bla.bla... ect.

??? Didn't the Brits kick Argentinian ass when the Argentinians tried to get the Falklands back? Long live the British Empire.

Of course they have to go higher you have to pay off Bushes debts. Anyone on this board is richer than America. You are -$250bn

The dollar is worthless. We are changing all our billing over to Euros from Euro based payment countries.

They still need more bombings to justify their next move.

there are some poor countries in africa with oil - and they even have some muslims there too - any of those would be ideal

Our oil doesn't come from Iraq. It comes from Saudi Arabia, who are the actually people behind the 911 Attacks.

can you say where oil comes from exactly? I'm no expert on the logistics of energy markets, however I presume the oil sold on the international energy markets is a homogenous product so it could come from anywhere really - and while saudi arabia has the most oil reserves, iraq is a not so distant second.

I guess they still have to plan and rule out everything first, right? You can't just go and stake out after a country where you can hurt a lot of innocent people.

That's because of the harriers.