FTC SPAM story on cnn.com
 

oh my, this is not a good thing. the first of many.

they got off easy, only 50k compared to the others, 650k, 238k and 220k

Who said that any publicity is good publicity? Guess they were wrong.

sht man, that link to bangbros.com on cnn.com is something i would love

ya watch that is going to pay the fines for them just from the plug. HA!

someone fill me in..i know there is a connection between mikeAI of purecash and directnic and godaddy...

what exactly is that connection?

Haha, yeah I thought the same thing.

~Alli

damn...they have nothing else to write about i guess

MikeAI got out of adult awhile back. I believe Purecash was sold. Do a search. There was a thread about this, if I am not mistaken.

I have no problem with them capping all the assholes flooding unsolicited porn spam :upsidedow

Spam is the only thing that can and will make my blood boil every single time I turn my computer on. I'm willing to wager that those fines are hardly enough to deter anyone, though.

Civil lawsuits/fines are no big deal to the companies. They are lucky there are no criminal charges. With that said, spam should be a civil matter and not criminal. The law and justice system is backwards. There's murderers and rapists getting off with less time than someone who advertises to refinance you rmortgage in someone's inbox. Insane.

It's always comedy gold listeneng to a spammer trying to justify their existence by comparing themselves to murderers and rapists/

I'm not a mailer but yes it does outrage me to see society and the government more accepting of violent criminals than of someone who sends advertisements. The time just doesn't fit the crime. They can make it a civil matter all they want, they have every right to... it's all about money anyway, but the criminal punishment is absurd and unfair.