GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   FOX News employs TRAITORS (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=491912)

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 02:38 PM

FOX News employs TRAITORS
 
Fox News host John Gibson said that Karl Rove should be given a "medal" for outing the identity of Valerie Plame. Gibson also said that he is glad that someone finally outed Valerie Plame. This fucking prick is saying he endorses breaching national security. Un-fucking believable. Anyone who thinks FOX News is nothing more than a right wing propaganda machine must have their head up their ass. But hey, at least its not about a blow job.

http://www.dembloggers.com/story/2005/7/12/155925/579

BiggleJones 07-13-2005 02:46 PM

wow....dembloggers is maybe the fruityist site I have come across in years. Just a bunch of crying hippies complaining when things dont go their way.

AcidMax 07-13-2005 02:52 PM

People are misguided, Karl Rove did nothing wrong from what I have read. He did not supply the identity of the woman, which is what is considered the crime. He just said the guys wife worked for the CIA, he never mentioned her name, the reporter then investigated further.

Don't think the guy deserves a medal or anything by any means, and if it comes out he did release her name he should be held accountable, but from what I read he did not give out the name.

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiggleJones
Just a bunch of crying hippies complaining when things dont go their way.

Thats exactly what FOX and the rest of the right wing propagandists are doing now, crying and complaining that Rove is going down :1orglaugh

spunkmaster 07-13-2005 02:57 PM

Wilson made his whole story up and had his wife on the cover of a major magazine. Wilson also lied and said his wife didn't have anything to do with his trip to Africa and we now know she did.

Kerry fired him as his advisor when he found out how much of a weasle wilson really is !

The Truth Hurts 07-13-2005 02:57 PM

gibson is takling about this very thing right now

directfiesta 07-13-2005 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
People are misguided, Karl Rove did nothing wrong from what I have read. He did not supply the identity of the woman, which is what is considered the crime. He just said the guys wife worked for the CIA, he never mentioned her name, the reporter then investigated further.

:1orglaugh

!00% right.... Just like I know the wife of Lensman is a CIA operative ... But don't you ever say that I outed her ... never said the name ...

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 07-13-2005 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
People are misguided, Karl Rove did nothing wrong from what I have read. He did not supply the identity of the woman, which is what is considered the crime. He just said the guys wife worked for the CIA, he never mentioned her name, the reporter then investigated further.

Don't think the guy deserves a medal or anything by any means, and if it comes out he did release her name he should be held accountable, but from what I read he did not give out the name.


Bah
Bah!

Bah!!!!


Sheeps in the field bleet!

Our leaders can do no wrong! :1orglaugh

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
People are misguided, Karl Rove did nothing wrong from what I have read. He did not supply the identity of the woman, which is what is considered the crime. He just said the guys wife worked for the CIA, he never mentioned her name, the reporter then investigated further.

If he didnt do anything wrong then why is a FOX News employee ranting on about how he's glad he did it? The spin has begun.
Watch the video
http://216.55.181.228/videos/071205c.wmv

AcidMax 07-13-2005 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ
Bah
Bah!

Bah!!!!


Sheeps in the field bleet!

Our leaders can do no wrong! :1orglaugh


Sorry, no sheep here, if someone fucked up they should be punished, and I am not taking Fox News word solely it is from the articles I have read. Granted the guy gave up some extra info he shoudn't have but according to law he did nothing wrong. I am a republican, but quite honestly Karl Rove means jack shit to me and if he compromised national security he should be punished to the fullest, just as every democrat should be who has/would do the same thing.

AcidMax 07-13-2005 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
If he didnt do anything wrong then why is a FOX News employee ranting on about how he's glad he did it? The spin has begun.
Watch the video
http://216.55.181.228/videos/071205c.wmv

C'mon I am sure you are not this ignorant, just because its on FoxNews and CNN, does it mean they all assume he is guilty?

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 07-13-2005 03:07 PM

How hard is it for an investigative reporter or a reporter to put 2 and 2 together...

God damn people are fucken lame these days.


Karl Rove needs to be shot for treason.
On Public television.

EviLSuperstaR 07-13-2005 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
:1orglaugh

!00% right.... Just like I know the wife of Lensman is a CIA operative ... But don't you ever say that I outed her ... never said the name ...

Hahahaha!

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
Sorry, no sheep here, if someone fucked up they should be punished, and I am not taking Fox News word solely it is from the articles I have read. Granted the guy gave up some extra info he shoudn't have but according to law he did nothing wrong. I am a republican, but quite honestly Karl Rove means jack shit to me and if he compromised national security he should be punished to the fullest, just as every democrat should be who has/would do the same thing.


So then how can you say he did nothing wrong? Please tell me what Rove's intentions were of doing it in the first place whether he gave her name or not. You know damn well it was nothing more than to smear and expose a CIA agent because she exposed Bush's lies about WMD. This is a national security issue and you people are okay with it. Unbelievable.

Sarah_Jayne 07-13-2005 03:09 PM

Why should fox 'news' worry about the way a journalist is treated? Last time I watched them the comment vs actual reporting made me think they didn't actually employ any real journalists anyway.

directfiesta 07-13-2005 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
Sorry, no sheep here,... I am a republican ...

End of thread! :1orglaugh

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 07-13-2005 03:11 PM

Here lets make it simple.

2 + X = 4

What is X?

THats what Rove did.

He is guilty of treason.

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ
How hard is it for an investigative reporter or a reporter to put 2 and 2 together...


A 2 second google search.

sperbonzo 07-13-2005 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlienQ
Bah
Bah!

Bah!!!!


Sheeps in the field bleet!

Our leaders can do no wrong! :1orglaugh

Why can't the left-winger's on this board just debate a point? Where did you guys learn to argue? On a playground? Does EVERY person that dares to disagree with you have to be insulted?

It's just silly and pathetic. Please learn to grow up people. :2 cents:

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Why can't the left-winger's on this board just debate a point? Where did you guys learn to argue? On a playground? Does EVERY person that dares to disagree with you have to be insulted?

It's just silly and pathetic. Please learn to grow up people. :2 cents:

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiggleJones
wow....dembloggers is maybe the fruityist site I have come across in years. Just a bunch of crying hippies complaining when things dont go their way.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

AcidMax 07-13-2005 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
So then how can you say he did nothing wrong? Please tell me what Rove's intentions were of doing it in the first place whether he gave her name or not. You know damn well it was nothing more than to smear and expose a CIA agent because she exposed Bush's lies about WMD. This is a national security issue and you people are okay with it. Unbelievable.

I NEVER once said what he did was right, I simply said it was illegal. You guys just want to piss and moan, fact of the matter is he did nothing wrong. Just because I am a republican by default means nothing regarding this issue, I think my statements are stricly common sense.

Again not saying what he did was right, but there are always 2 sides to the story, don't shoot the messnger (FoxNews, CNN, etc.,). It is not their fault, they are simply reporting the news and getting ratings, the fault should lie solely on Karl Rove if he broke the law.

Also think about this. Many people are saying the guy who was "Deep Throat" was a hero for what he did. The fact is that this shit with reporters has been going on for years wether you guys want to believe it or not, government insiders have ALWAYS given reporters inside information.

Giorgio_Xo 07-13-2005 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
People are misguided, Karl Rove did nothing wrong from what I have read. He did not supply the identity of the woman, which is what is considered the crime. He just said the guys wife worked for the CIA, he never mentioned her name, the reporter then investigated further.

Don't think the guy deserves a medal or anything by any means, and if it comes out he did release her name he should be held accountable, but from what I read he did not give out the name.

Oh please! You are completely naive.

AcidMax 07-13-2005 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Why can't the left-winger's on this board just debate a point? Where did you guys learn to argue? On a playground? Does EVERY person that dares to disagree with you have to be insulted?

It's just silly and pathetic. Please learn to grow up people. :2 cents:

I agree with a lot of things the dems stand for, just as I agree with a lot of things the republicans stand for, but unfortunately almost every democrat I have ever scene has always been confrontational like that. It sucks, and I am not always right, but instead of being childish, state your points, I am not always good at it either, but I never result to name calling.

sperbonzo 07-13-2005 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
Quote:
Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Why can't the left-winger's on this board just debate a point? Where did you guys learn to argue? On a playground? Does EVERY person that dares to disagree with you have to be insulted?

It's just silly and pathetic. Please learn to grow up people.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BiggleJones
wow....dembloggers is maybe the fruityist site I have come across in years. Just a bunch of crying hippies complaining when things dont go their way.:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Ok I see your point, and agree.... When EITHER side does it it's just silly :2 cents:

CognitiveDissonance 07-13-2005 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
He just said the guys wife worked for the CIA, he never mentioned her name, the reporter then investigated further.

Even if this is true, and I'm not jumping to any conclusions on that score, WHY was Wilson's wife even a point of interest for Rove? From what I understand, she suggested Wilson for the assignment, but someone higher up the ladder made the final decision. Wilson was certainly qualified for this sort of mission, no?

It appears that Rove (and let me put on my tin foil hat and suggest this goes higher than him) was simply out to discredit Joe Wilson FOR TELLING THE TRUTH, a truth the administration didn't want people to hear. He couldn't attack the message so he attacked the messenger. When that didn't work, he went after the messenger's family.

Even if he broke no laws, what he did was morally reprehensible. I don't think there's any question that the blowing of Valerie Plame's cover is a national security issue. At the least, it would mean one less agent in the field, the shell company that she "worked" for scuttled, and all of the assets working with her potentially compromised.

cambaby 07-13-2005 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax
Also think about this. Many people are saying the guy who was "Deep Throat" was a hero for what he did. The fact is that this shit with reporters has been going on for years wether you guys want to believe it or not, government insiders have ALWAYS given reporters inside information.

So so so so so true.

AcidMax 07-13-2005 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giorgio_Xo
Oh please! You are completely naive.

Prove me wrong? Can you? Nope. How am I naive, I have a different point of view, I don't think that makes me naive.

AcidMax 07-13-2005 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CognitiveDissonance
Even if this is true, and I'm not jumping to any conclusions on that score, WHY was Wilson's wife even a point of interest for Rove? From what I understand, she suggested Wilson for the assignment, but someone higher up the ladder made the final decision. Wilson was certainly qualified for this sort of mission, no?

It appears that Rove (and let me put on my tin foil hat and suggest this goes higher than him) was simply out to discredit Joe Wilson FOR TELLING THE TRUTH, a truth the administration didn't want people to hear. He couldn't attack the message so he attacked the messenger. When that didn't work, he went after the messenger's family.

Even if he broke no laws, what he did was morally reprehensible. I don't think there's any question that the blowing of Valerie Plame's cover is a national security issue. At the least, it would mean one less agent in the field, the shell company that she "worked" for scuttled, and all of the assets working with her potentially compromised.


I like you cannot answer those questions because I don't know all the facts. My point was simply that he did not actually break any law as he "supposedly" did not provide the CIA operatives name, he simple said his wife worked for the CIA. That's all. I agree he should have kept his mouth shut, but the words TRAITOR,TREASON etc should not be brought up at this point, until we know FOR SURE if he did provide her name or not, at this point I think its premature for people to make those comments, and again this sort of thing has been going on for YEARS!

directfiesta 07-13-2005 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AcidMax

Also think about this. Many people are saying the guy who was "Deep Throat" was a hero for what he did. The fact is that this shit with reporters has been going on for years wether you guys want to believe it or not, government insiders have ALWAYS given reporters inside information.

Quote:

Valerie Plame was an undercover operations officer until outed in the press by Robert Novak. Novak's column was not an isolated attack. It was in fact part of a coordinated, orchestrated smear that we now know includes at least Karl Rove.
Was Nixon undercover??? Was his life in danger because of DeepThroat??? Did Valerie Pane do illegal actions, like Nixon did ...
How can you even compare one another...

There is nothing illegal in exposing the lies and deceptions of a President. In fact, it is the duty of ALL americans to do so.

Obviously, the only investigation of a leak that the GOP is interested in is a SPERM leak ....

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Obviously, the only investigation of a leak that the GOP is interested in is a SPERM leak ....

:1orglaugh
Thats fucking classic. That should be on billboards everywhere

lickmymonster 07-13-2005 03:39 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162406,00.html

cambaby 07-13-2005 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis
:1orglaugh
Thats fucking classic. That should be on billboards everywhere

Yes especially since the sperm thats leaking is coming from your mouth after I nut all up in it.

ronbotx 07-13-2005 03:42 PM

This is the same type of crap we had to listen to during the Rathergate affair and the result will be the same. More embarassment for the media and lefties.


Here what I think will happen:

1) Special prosecutor will come back with NO charge on Rove. No law broken.
2) The source that the NY Times/ Judith Miller are protecting is NOT Karl Rove, but either Wilson himself, or perhaps another reporter.
3) The media will look stupid again, and will lose even more respect and credibility for this non-event/non-story
4) Rove will be vindicated. Bush and Rove will have a good laugh about it.
5 ) Libs, dems, and GFY leftists will cry for the next month.

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx
This is the same type of crap we had to listen to during the Rathergate affair and the result will be the same. More embarassment for the media and lefties.


Here what I think will happen:

2) The source that the NY Times/ Judith Miller are protecting is NOT Karl Rove, but either Wilson himself, or perhaps another reporter.

Read the fucking article right on Fox's site.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,162406,00.html

'Cooper confirmed that his source on the leak was Deputy Chief of Staff Rove, one of President Bush's most trusted advisers and the man credited with Bush's four consecutive campaign victories.'

SuckOnThis 07-13-2005 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby
Yes especially since the sperm thats leaking is coming from your mouth after I nut all up in it.


Please leave me out of your homosexual sperm drinking fantasies.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123