![]() |
Why isn't there a site like this?
(I originally posted this as a reply but I figure it merits its own thread...)
It would be interesting to see a site where 100 designers are given the same materials to make tours from, same text, etc. They create their tours and join pages but all then go to same processor for same account. The tours all get rotated through the SAME traffic pool. Then the site lists the conversion results. So the final breakdown would be Design firm name, clickable link to their site, clickable thumb of their tour, their CTR score, their CTR to Signup score, and their pricing for such tour (range pricing) Just a thought. (Since webmasterlabor.com doesn't do adult content-related projects anymore, we won't be implementing this... if that question crossed your mind :) :) ) Or maybe design is one of those things that YOU REALLY CAN'T COMPARE since it is more of an art... ?(although the item above compares not the "art" but the OBJECTIVE NUMBERS of the effect of such "art") Possible domain names (I didn't check whois so they may be taken): designercomparisons.com designconversionratings.com designreports.com Anyway, post your thoughts. If anyone needs any CUSTOM RESEARCH re new site ideas or MARKET VALIDATION/BUSINESS VALIDATION reports, email me at info AT webmasterlabor . com |
Of course the traffic source mix would spelled out as well. With % if possible.
The benefit to consumer would be easy to see but what about the designer? Greater publicity for one thing. Also, even if the conversion number for the 1st month is down, it can still go up since the site is updated PERIODICALLY with a new set of materials given and new tours put up. Your thoughts. |
there ya go , get it going! :thumbsup
good idea, for someone that already deals in webmaster traffic... could have mainstream and adult... |
Quote:
|
ahh , ok
|
bump for comments/discussion/thoughts/analysis
|
Hell, I'm game. :)
|
Quote:
|
bizzump for consumer comparisons
|
Quote:
Would give me a great opportunity to prove that a loud mouth doesn't make your designs convert better. :) |
Quote:
|
or it can be structured as a blog... to keep up the suspense?
|
Quote:
so maybe do a feature special on each design firm as their entries are received? |
$5 has got his thinking cap on today. Good idea.
|
Quote:
|
Very good idea, I like it. :thumbsup
|
pretty good idea, it's a win-win situation for all parties involved...
|
Quote:
1. Has the knowledge and integrity to provide impartial management and reporting 2. Has the knowledge and resources to create the back-end 3. Has enough time and desire to venture into this. You'd be the best one to fit the description, if it weren't for the no longer doing adult part. :) |
Quote:
|
Another thought... maybe structure it like a site review site but instead of paysites, focus on design firms/designers. Have an interview. Design philosophy. Photos of their team, etc then the raw numbers.
The focus is EVEN IF THE NUMBERS are off, the consumer still gets a VIEW of who they are dealing with and perhaps still buy (since numbers fluctuate from month to month normally). If anything, it will open doors for design firms. |
Sorry, guys, I have my consulting hat on today so Im just spitting out ideas...
REVENUE STREAMS 1) non designer ads -- program ads -- webmaster resource ads -- etc 2) PREMIUM reports -- ie., OLD scores are hidden, only new scores are shown so if you want Pattern/Trend info you have to pay 3) Sponsorships from programs--if the program converts, hell, why not flaunt it by having multiple designers do tours? 4) Set a standard contract where site gets a % of design sales (ie., tour is sold by firm to a program) Pls critique There's tons of other ways you can monetize this. Next line of thought.. promoting the site. |
the DRAMA-FREE environment would also help a lot
|
Sounds like a great idea.
|
Stop.
It's BUMPING TIME. |
btw, these ideas are FREE, feel free to EXECUTE. Also, help yourself to the domain name suggestions above.
|
Maybe a sponsor program can do this?
|
Interesting concept Gene :thumbsup
|
|
Quote:
|
I think the idea is really good. However, at this time, I have a feeling that pretty much everyone, except maybe for designers, is having bigger headaches to deal with. I honestly don't see this thing happening anytime soon.
|
Quote:
|
I remember this idea from last year. Didn't it come from you then too? :)
|
nice idea you got here $5 ..hopefullly someone will be able to make this happen..
|
Quote:
|
Bumping free ideas for others to execute and profit from (while serving the greater webmaster community).
|
Its an excellent idea, but it would take a bit of a invesment (money, resources, networking and time wise) to implement it in a good way
|
css could handle that
Hey hey
you know css zen garden (http://www.csszengarden.com/) has something going this reminds me of. If it's truly to be a test of design's ability to seduce/convert traffic, then there should be no variables but the design & tour. So price/range stays the same - in fact the way css zen garden does it they have something like 80 different designs (all called from .css files) and one html page that is affected by the different designs. I'm playing with this myself at the moment... pretty powerful stuff css, though it requires that one's brain rewire itself away from html ... did you go see the site? |
Good ideas, dime a dozen now from $5 submissions :winkwink:
Props to $5 submissions, one of the more creative guys around. :thumbsup A good idea but there are also a few designers out there that run affiliate programs / paysites tehmselves like dickmans who really know which kind of tours convert and hence are the best choice for converting designs / tours anyway. |
It would be nice to have an objective site that can test proficiency in an easy to navigate consumer report type of format.
Quote:
|
My brains fried right now. But a couple of obstacles to consider.
1. You would have to cover a broad spectrum of niches, which could literally be thousands of tours for the pool size you recommeded and a huge traffic base to test them properly. 2. The majorority of designers could not afford to invest their time into creating 15-20+ tours that won't produce any income and may not convert. So basically you're left with ony the top firms who could afford to allocate those resources. Some things to ponder... Love the idea though! |
Quote:
I could probably pull this one off, but I may have some trust issues since I'm fairly unknown. |
One way some of the problems I posted could be solved would be by having a huge sponsor with a massive network and treat it similar to a BYOT program.
Maybe that's what Marc De has planned for the ARS BYOT re launch... |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123