why cant terrorists kill the people who NEED to be killed?
 

killing innocent people sucks. I guess it keeps the terror high because "anyone could be attacked" but still its fucking lame. perhaps they werent so innocent after all, some of the people killed could have been scum bag pedophiles or rapists and what a loss that would have been.

Today in London for instance, they could have killed 50-60 police but instead they chose to bomb the subway. sure they used logic and planned it out fairly nicely. subways are a perfect place to bomb because its always going to have people occupying it and they did it during rush hour so thats even more damage.

If I was in Al-qaeda I would kill people that needed to be killed: Lawyers, corrupt cops, senators, Tom DeLay, rapists, child actors, etc.

If they killed the people that need to be killed, it would not be terrorism. It would be merc work.

Boondock saints :thumbsup

Nobody is innocent, did you forget about the original sin? :winkwink:

Well what are you waiting for?

The sequel is being filmed.

why can't they kill ryan seacrest?

Terrorists are also the ones who need to be killed. Today was a fine example of terrorists murdering themselves.

1:30 people who died were terrorists.

That's probably about the same terrorist death conversion ratio in Iraq right now.

What's out of the ordinary about today's 30 deaths?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup

Didn't they blow themselves up along with everyone else?