GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   What do affiliates thing? would you shy away from a program because it uses paycom??? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=489161)

sonofsam 07-06-2005 08:42 PM

What do affiliates thing? would you shy away from a program because it uses paycom???
 
Just curious... my paysite is with paycom, due to the fact that i'm in canada and even though i incorporated in the US i wouldn't be able to get ccbill as they require the principle to live in the US etc.... but with paycom you can just use your canadian passport etc...

would most affiliates not promote a program because its on paycom, or does it really not matter?

thanks for the feedback :thumbsup


edit: i meant what do affiliates THINK in the title....

Relish XXX 07-06-2005 08:44 PM

I think affiliates like Paycom or CCBill. If you were using Ibill I think their would be a problem!

sonofsam 07-06-2005 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relish XXX
I think affiliates like Paycom or CCBill. If you were using Ibill I think their would be a problem!

oh well ibill is primary processor... i'm using paycom as secondary :1orglaugh jk

Doctor Dre 07-06-2005 08:48 PM

I'd actually go with a site that use paycome over ccbill ... but that's just my :2cents

(Nothing wrong with ccbill ... I just like paycom a lot)

basschick 07-06-2005 08:48 PM

paycom's stats aren't as good as ccbill's, but their checks come every week - no problems with paycom for me.

Matt 26z 07-06-2005 08:48 PM

I don't have a problem with them. Why should anyone?

sonofsam 07-06-2005 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z
I don't have a problem with them. Why should anyone?

Great to hear :thumbsup was just curious but i was under the impression most affiliates preferred ccbill programs

RogerV 07-06-2005 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relish XXX
I think affiliates like Paycom or CCBill. If you were using Ibill I think their would be a problem!

I have to agree

BV 07-06-2005 08:53 PM

We offer both (CCBill & Paycom)
Both are very good.

We let each affiliate choose inside their admin which biller they want for their primary.

and some prefer one over the other, good too offer both :2 cents:

sonofsam 07-06-2005 09:02 PM

yah i wish i could offer both, but i'm in canada.. so i'm lucky enough to have paycom.... i used an incorporation company to form a company for me in delaware.. but ccbill requires the principle owner (me) to live in the states... so its a no go with them

Hornydog4cooter 07-06-2005 09:04 PM

paycom has been screwy lately. No sales for 5 days and boom 16 sales today go figure......

NaughtyRob 07-06-2005 09:44 PM

It would not bother me. :thumbsup

Forkbeard 07-06-2005 10:52 PM

Programs that use Paycom as a processer invisibly to me (maintaining their own stats and sending me their own checks) are fine. But I won't join any affiliate program that expects me to rely on the worthless PayCom affiliate stats. And I'm not happy receiving PayCom checks because they make it very hard to tell what program the checks are in relation to. They also won't correct billing addresses (they keep telling me to have the program owner do that) and I've got a couple programs where the program owner won't answer emails, won't update my billing address, and I'm going to lose the rebills soon when my one-year USPS mail forwarding order runs out.

Let me repeat it: Paycom affiliate stats are worthless and pathetic. For that reason, and that reason alone, I will no longer join a program that provides nothing but Paycom stats.

It's a huge problem. Paycom provides zero referral information and zero click counting. Without ratios and referring URLs, there's no way to guage the effectiveness of a link campaign. Waste of my traffic.

What I don't understand is why a company that can get some things so right can't be bothered to update its worthless stats reporting.

BV 07-07-2005 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Forkbeard
Programs that use Paycom as a processer invisibly to me (maintaining their own stats and sending me their own checks) are fine. But I won't join any affiliate program that expects me to rely on the worthless PayCom affiliate stats. And I'm not happy receiving PayCom checks because they make it very hard to tell what program the checks are in relation to. They also won't correct billing addresses (they keep telling me to have the program owner do that) and I've got a couple programs where the program owner won't answer emails, won't update my billing address, and I'm going to lose the rebills soon when my one-year USPS mail forwarding order runs out.

Let me repeat it: Paycom affiliate stats are worthless and pathetic. For that reason, and that reason alone, I will no longer join a program that provides nothing but Paycom stats.

It's a huge problem. Paycom provides zero referral information and zero click counting. Without ratios and referring URLs, there's no way to guage the effectiveness of a link campaign. Waste of my traffic.

What I don't understand is why a company that can get some things so right can't be bothered to update its worthless stats reporting.

Probably not enough demand for it.
My guess is that programs that recieve most of the hard earned traffic and generate the most sales offer cascade billing and other bells and whistles which wouldn't be possible using 3rd party affliliate software.

CybermedAndy 07-07-2005 12:03 AM

We'll be pushing your sites regardless of what you're using as a processor. :thumbsup

Although in our experience ccbill tends to scrub a little harder than Paycom.

Machete_ 07-07-2005 12:21 AM

we use paycom as the processor, but NATS as the frontend, and our affiliates love it.
No cheating - never down.. an unlike CCbill, there isent any cracy sales fluctuations

Mako 07-07-2005 12:28 AM

Good post sos.

Several people have told me over ICQ in identical discussions lately that they're following ebus dk's route: NATS up front, Paycom behind the scenes. Best of both worlds.

Machete_ 07-07-2005 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mako
Good post sos.

Several people have told me over ICQ in identical discussions lately that they're following ebus dk's route: NATS up front, Paycom behind the scenes. Best of both worlds.

Thanks - now sign up for my program - se sig. hahahahah

Mako 07-07-2005 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebus_dk
Thanks - now sign up for my program - se sig. hahahahah

LOL, done! It was just that easy people, all you had to do was say "see sig" and you would have landed me. :winkwink:

Forkbeard 07-07-2005 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebus_dk
we use paycom as the processor, but NATS as the frontend, and our affiliates love it.

Absolutely. NATS isn't my favorite affiliate interface, but it's serviceable.

The raw PayCom stats (and there are still many programs that offer nothing else) are crap.

XPays 07-07-2005 02:27 PM

if you care about affiliate tracking you should use http://XPays.com and drop all other sponsors. well, ok keep a few if you must but you'll only need us and you'll have integration with the world instantly.

signup now for free at http://XPays.com

XPAYS always pays!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123