GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Would you vote for Hillary Clinton if she ran for president in 2008? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=488176)

IPK 07-03-2005 11:07 PM

Would you vote for Hillary Clinton if she ran for president in 2008?
 
Yes or No?

xlogger 07-03-2005 11:09 PM

Yes! I would love to see a women as a president. I dont know why we never had one, other countries had them. Why never us?

TDF 07-03-2005 11:10 PM

fuck no..wars ever menstrual cycle!

Mr Pheer 07-03-2005 11:13 PM

I'll vote for whatever it takes to keep a republican from being the next president.

IPK 07-03-2005 11:14 PM

http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/...400_flash4.htm

Clinton's Odds For Winning White House Set At 5-1
Wed Jun 29 2005 09:51:56 ET

Odds that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) will win the White House in 2008 have improved greatly -- at least in the underworld of online betting, ROLL CALL reports.

At the Web-based sports book, SportsInteraction.com, Clinton's odds of occupying the White House in 2008 have improved to 5-1. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani follows with 7-1 odds of winning the presidency in 2008, ahead of former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.), who fetched 9-1 odds.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson is fourth with 13-1 odds, followed by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) with 15-1 odds. Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) is last on the SportsInteraction.com Web site, with 41-1 odds of winning the White House in 2008.

Brujah 07-04-2005 12:00 AM

Anything to get rid of the bible thumper party.

Natasha 07-04-2005 12:01 AM

if i was american...hell ya!

baddog 07-04-2005 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xlogger
Yes! I would love to see a women as a president. I dont know why we never had one, other countries had them. Why never us?


Care to name a successful country that had a female presidnet?

spunkmaster 07-04-2005 12:06 AM

I thought she was the anti-christ?

Brujah 07-04-2005 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Care to name a successful country that had a female presidnet?

Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990 Margaret Thatcher ?

bringer 07-04-2005 12:16 AM

http://www.uhuh.com/clinton/hrc-hits.htm

SilverTab 07-04-2005 12:17 AM

Come on...we had kim campbell

IPK 07-04-2005 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer

bah no one cares any more. it's all old news.

bringer 07-04-2005 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IPK
bah no one cares any more. it's all old news.

i know, old news only matters if you dislike the person

Clicky_Bucks 07-04-2005 12:27 AM

It will never happen so why even discuss it? Hillary Clinton is HATED by more than 50 percent of the US population. She is not electable.

baddog 07-04-2005 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Prime Minister from 1979 to 1990 Margaret Thatcher ?


I said successful

Brujah 07-04-2005 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer
i know, old news only matters if you dislike the person

Anymore it's not about getting a good candidate, it's about which candidate will be the lesser of two evils.

bringer 07-04-2005 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Anymore it's not about getting a good candidate, it's about which candidate will be the lesser of two evils.

very true, but until i know who hillary will be running against she doesnt get my vote. we all know its not bush, so giving her your vote to out bush is retarded.

Brujah 07-04-2005 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
I said successful

The UK isn't a successful country ? Idiot.

Gunni 07-04-2005 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Care to name a successful country that had a female presidnet?

Ireland, England, Iceland...

baddog 07-04-2005 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
The UK isn't a successful country ? Idiot.


Yeah, they certainly excel in . . . . ummm, what is it they do again?

Sorry, but Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister of England doesn't quite match the responsibilty of being Governor of California, much less the President ot the United States,

baddog 07-04-2005 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunni
Ireland, England, Iceland...


Okay, I guess I should qualify it to a country bigger than the State of Texas.

kaori 07-04-2005 12:42 AM

I'd vote for Bill if he was able to run again :)

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-04-2005 12:43 AM

I'm surprised to see Giuliani ahead of McCain on the Republican side - however, keep in mind that gambling sites often hype and promote such nonsense only to improve their house odds...i.e., to lure in sucker bettors.

Giuliani is the worst possible suck-up, grand-standing, meglomaniac candidate that I can imagine.

Giuliani has way too many skeletons in his closet (even more than Hillary - his messy divorce, various mistresses, the Kerik scandal, etc). Plus he is a hypocrite that is just plain bad for the adult industry.

McCain, is largely perceived as the consumate pragamatist deal-maker, whose values and integrity are above reproach by most Americans. Ingredients that could make him a strong contender the next time around. Given his age, this will likely be his last hurrah. Should Hillary lose to him, but make a good showing, she should be a powerful candidate the next time around.

I think Hillary is going to have an uphill battle even among Democrats in her first run at the Presidency, however if she fairs well amongst Democrats, even if she fails to win the nomination or Presidency, she should have a good chance in the following election, especially if no improvements are seen in the economy, the Middle East, in Healthcare, or in Education and Social Security.

Call me a pessimist, but short of a Giuliani presidency (which I would consider a disaster), anything else should be an improvement over the current regime.

ADG Webmaster

IPK 07-04-2005 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Yeah, they certainly excel in . . . . ummm, what is it they do again?

they keep most adult dialer programs in business. duh.

pornguy 07-04-2005 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Care to name a successful country that had a female presidnet?

Panama!

that have a female president, and do very well.

bjjb 07-04-2005 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TDF
fuck no..wars ever menstrual cycle!

AT her age? Nah..... Post menopausal hotflashes and shit but no menstrual stress :1orglaugh

IPK 07-04-2005 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude
Giuliani has way too many skeletons in his closet (even more than Hillary - his messy divorce, various mistresses, the Kerik scandal, etc). Plus he is a hypocrite that is just plain bad for the adult industry.

He would definitely be bad for the adult industry. He pretty much cleaned out the entire adult biz (strip clubs, adult bookstores, videos, etc) from NYC.

Brujah 07-04-2005 12:51 AM

Note to Europeans: Don't judge the ignorance of American's by baddog.

Right baddog, I'm sure Arnold Schwarzeneggar as Governor of California is a much better leader than Margaret Thatcher could ever dream of being.

xlogger 07-04-2005 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Care to name a successful country that had a female presidnet?

Prime Minister of Great Britain use to be a women.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-04-2005 01:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Note to Europeans: Don't judge the ignorance of American's by baddog.

Right baddog, I'm sure Arnold Schwarzeneggar as Governor of California is a much better leader than Margaret Thatcher could ever dream of being.

Actually, Arnold pretty much sucks. His poll numbers are lower than Gray Davis' numbers were before he was voted out.

Although as Dubya once said, never "misundersestimate" him.

ADG Webmaster

bhutocracy 07-04-2005 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Yeah, they certainly excel in . . . . ummm, what is it they do again?

Sorry, but Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister of England doesn't quite match the responsibilty of being Governor of California, much less the President ot the United States,

Dude.. seriously.. don't be a dildo. The UK is a obviously bigger than California economically, not only that but far more responsibility given it isn't merely a state... Or does California have it's own Airforce, Navy, Currency etc?

England was the last "America". Never forget that.

SilverTab 07-04-2005 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Okay, I guess I should qualify it to a country bigger than the State of Texas.


how about canada?

wait it's not successful enough?? or there's too many prairies???

If you question was: Name another country exactly like United States, the same size as US... that had a female president...the answer is none....

Now if UK or Ireland or Canada are "unsuccessfull" countries to you LOL... I have to assume(or hope) you are kidding.... just saying they never did anything doesn't make it factual....

Cash 07-04-2005 02:29 AM

I'd vote for her :)

bringer 07-04-2005 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhutocracy
England was the last "America". Never forget that.

wtf? :1orglaugh

bringer 07-04-2005 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhutocracy
The UK is a obviously bigger than California economically

http://www.lao.ca.gov/2002/cal_facts/econ.html
california is pretty big

alexg 07-04-2005 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Care to name a successful country that had a female presidnet?

UK like some people already said

Israel - Golda Meir, Prime Minister
prime minister in israel is the highest responsibility, much like president in the US. f.e Ariel Sharon is the prime minister today.

although all the haters now will argue that Israel is not successful :)

Theo 07-04-2005 02:40 AM

paris hilton for president

bhutocracy 07-04-2005 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer


I know it's big.. it's just not bigger than the UK. I was in Cali shortly after Arnold was elected.. all I heard was how the terminator was in control of the worlds 7th largest economy. Once again not saying it's small just correcting an obvious falsehood.

bhutocracy 07-04-2005 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringer
wtf? :1orglaugh

That was more in response to "Yeah, they certainly excel in . . . . ummm, what is it they do again?"
They operate almost the same as America.. they've also had a lot more experience at being a global power.. so technology, arms sales, development loans etc.

In 100 years people might say "America was the last "China"" ;)
Basically it annoys me to see people poking fun at the last empire because it makes me feel sorry for them for their ignorance.
Unfortunately America's global hegemony won't last forever and it can fall from dominance as quickly as it grew. Sooner or later America will be a quaint country where the people have a legacy of a ruling mindset but the impotence to exercise it like current day England. Merely a player instead of the leader. I hope that day is later rather than sooner but it's a sad inevitability (for the west anyways).

alec 07-04-2005 03:32 AM

She can be the next US president. As long as Bill willbe her secretary..lol

baddog 07-04-2005 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah
Note to Europeans: Don't judge the ignorance of American's by baddog.

Right baddog, I'm sure Arnold Schwarzeneggar as Governor of California is a much better leader than Margaret Thatcher could ever dream of being.


Arnold is an idiot, but he has more responsibility than the PM of England

JFK 07-04-2005 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilverTab
Come on...we had kim campbell

OH Boy, you just had to bring that up didnt you :1orglaugh

BiggleJones 07-04-2005 12:59 PM

Giuliani in 2008!!

IPK 07-04-2005 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Arnold is an idiot, but he has more responsibility than the PM of England

No way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_M...United_Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, the Prime Minister is the head of government, exercising many of the executive functions nominally vested in the Sovereign, who is head of state. According to custom, the Prime Minister and the Cabinet (which he or she heads) are responsible for their actions to Parliament, of which they are members by (modern) convention. The current Prime Minister is Tony Blair (of the Labour Party), who has been in office since 1997.

angel_x3ws 07-04-2005 01:13 PM

very interesting discussions... but sometimes it really doesn't matter whether it's a male or a female who's doing the job of president, prime minister or whatever... in our country, we have experienced both and sad to say the development here is only gradual.. and right now our female president is so darn stupid.. she actually almost indirectly admitted committing electoral fraud..

LittleSassy 07-04-2005 01:17 PM

yeah...exaclty...

tranza 07-04-2005 01:17 PM

If I could vote: YES!

rambler 07-04-2005 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Arnold is an idiot, but he has more responsibility than the PM of England

:eek7

You must have access to some really good drugs.

xlogger 07-04-2005 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
Arnold is an idiot, but he has more responsibility than the PM of England

huh? :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123