Bush is coming to Denmark
 

..in few days.

I invited him for a pokergame and gonna order hookers - like I did for Tyson some years ago. Does he like Thai?

Btw, does SS mean Secret Service? Someone knocks on my door :Oh crap

One of my houses is in Fredensborg, where he will have his birthday dinner - the whole city is closed down, and when he visits, we are not alowed to enter or exit our own house.... If it was my only house, I would be PISSED.

I dont know why we invited that man :Oh crap

:upsidedow :upsidedow

I´ll be there throwing gamle polser with remulade on him

my condolences........

http://www.webbusiness.no/webprivat/...Bush-idiot.jpg

Would you keep him, please?

you want me to send you couple of hundreds rotten tomatoes?

not cute , take it away :2 cents:

Because your gov is taking his cock up their asses and by the fact up yours ...

You are part of the huge " coalition of the willings " ..

:1orglaugh

ouch

hahahahhaha.. you are laughing.. and from Israel? hahahahahhahahahahahah

Sorry here I have to defend the Israeli, they have nukes you dont be careful frozen boy. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Could you please keep him there? lol

I remember when he came to the UK. 30,000 police were called into protect him. They tried to think of where to take him but couldnt think of anywhere whee he wouldnt be stoned to death so he just went home.

:1orglaugh :thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

There was also a very undiplomatic verbal spewage from one of the Met Police Deputy Commissioners complaining about the incompetence of some "men in black" and saying he never wanted to see em ever again on his patch! :-)

Obviously 30,000 police were not enough... or maybe he wanted to allow the public clear shots for the stoning to death...

I KNOW that my gov takes bush's cock up the ass.

for him, this came as a surprise :1orglaugh

Now I know why there were weird looking choppers flying over here yesterday.

Black Hawks. Very easy to hunt with stingers. At least if you play battlefield :thumbsup

LOL watching this pseudo "event" on tv was just weird and disturbing at the same time. I imagine it was like watching Fox News :helpme

Both major tv channels in Denmark cleared their entire schedule and broadcast live coverage of Bush's arrival in the airport. They started about one hour before he landed with possible landing scenarious like would the planes land on this or that runway, would he land 9:16 pm or 9:20 pm etc. etc.
And reporters everywhere reporting about nothing.

And then the big finale where we actually saw Bush for about 1 minute getting into a chopper and taking off to the Queen's castle where he is going to sleep.

Naturally there was a military guy in the studio telling about the kind of chopper George W was flying and how the weather affected the flight. And even a 3d animation of the route spiced up with footage filmed yesterday from a chopper flying the same route.

It was just hilarious. One of the anchors even kept making sarcastic remarks at a few occasions realizing this wasn't exactly breaking news :)

start polishing the bullet now

dident turn on the TV today because of that.. what person came with that remark?

Det var Morten Løkkegård på DR, der lod til at være lidt utilfreds med at skulle dække begivenheden...

Frit efter hukommelsen sagde han bl.a.
"Ja så bliver det vist ikke meget mere spændende" og "Selv Hollywood instruktører kunne vist ikke have planlagt en bedre action-scene" i en ganske sarkastisk tone...
Da han skulle spørge meteorologen om hvordan vejret var lige nu i lufthavnen lød han også en anelse modvillig :)

FEDT... hvad laver en ellers meget seriøs i sådan et lorteshow

How can you guys not like Bush? He's a great man. He's done a lot of good for his country, and for the world. I could name all the positive things he's done, but I don't feel like it. If you don't understand you must hate freedom or something.

You guys must not watch enough Fox "news".

who knows, he might like denmark. do us all a favor and stay there for good.

Freedom? Denmark is the oldest kingdom, a little peaceful hobbit country, where we care more about the price of a Carlsberg beer than the price of oil, and if the welfare system should be sponsored by 48 -or 50 % taxes. Though there are exceptions, we like to "hygge", which can be translated to chill out with friends and family without starting too much trouble. It's more popular to watch song contests at TV, than propaganda news, even the producers knows that. What you don't do here, is taking away that "hygge" and start underestimate and bullshit with the people and the media. The politicians have no absolute power, and they can only win with arguments, not clichés.

I'm really sure most people are glad to get rid of Saddam, but lie to get there was a big big mistake. And when he also "seduced" the existing government here to alliance, it stole the innocent of our hobbits and turned proud into sceptisism. War is never popular, but there are also other factors like Kyoto. Enviroment is, and has always been, one important thing here, and people are willing to pay for it.
Further, we like leaders who hang out with the people and not hiding; when Clinton was here in 97, he went to a local Jazz club :upsidedow

The latest poll shows that only 10% of the population here support Bush and his world policy. But remember; lack of support does not necessary equal hate - it just tell that he is totally wrong, and continuing in wrong directions will lead to downfall sooner or later.

well said!!! :1orglaugh :pimp :thumbsup

honestly, i haven't seen bush in person. i wonder how he looks like. will i ever get to see him face to face?

He looks like Goober Pyle in that shot, he just needs the goofy hat :1orglaugh

George Bush is a stand up guy just like his old man

HAHAHAHAHA! I guess that is why Denmark has increased the Greenhouse gases emissions by 6,2% from 1990 levels:

http://www2.dmu.dk/1_Viden/2_miljoe-..._tagets_en.asp

The high energy prices in Denmark are only going to keep the socialist welfear model alive - it will not help Denmark live up to Kyoto :2 cents:

Well I had a discussion about this with a mate yesterday because of this visit.

Basically Bush as a person I don't think is that bad a guy, I would go so far as to say he is probably a nice guy.

BUT that is obviously irrelevant since his purpose is not to be a nice guy but to be the president. He has shown numerous times that he makes very fundamental decisions based on religion and not reason. And since he bases all his decisions on something I don't believe in nor find very rational (his religious belief) I think he is a terrible president and don't support him.

In 2003, yes. But you can't take out just 1 year like that, because there are other factors that can make it jump. If you look at the 7 years before, it has been reduced year by year. That tells me more.

Keep the fucker...

So you think Denmark, which economic growth recovered strongly in the last 2 years are going to reduze the CO2 output, while keeping growth going? I bet the numbers for 2004 and 2005 are even higher than 2003. Just look at all of the new cars, houses, computers, mobilephones etc. and tell me if you really think that Denmark is using more or less energy than in 2003......

Denmark´s biggest problem is that coal is used to produce energy, so everytime the danish economy grows, then CO2 output also increases. There are only 2 options for Denmark - new energy forms or buy CO2 quotas. Only energy forms that realistic can cut C02 output by Kyoto deadline is Nuclear Energy, however due to brainwashing by socialists in 1970s and to this date, then people think that Nuclear Energy is more bad than coal :1orglaugh (oh, and please do not think that windenergy can cover 100% of the energy HAHAHA!)

If Denmark is going to buy CO2 quotas, then please stop acting like you are all better than the rest of the world - you are just exporting your problem to 3rd world countries.

To summaries Denmark is not a good example when talking about Kyoto - its probably one of the worst examples :2 cents:

I agree on your comments on Denmark not being a good example when buying CO2 quotes from countries. Actually the option to buy/sell CO2 quotes is good for the environment globally since the industries can gain profit by filtering their chimneys etc - even though it can sound crazy.
The economic calculations for this are however quite complex to explain.

You are wrong when stating that the biggest problem is that coal is used to produce energy, and that the only alternative is wind energy. As a matter of fact many power plants in Denmark have converted to using gas from "Nordsøen".

The converting proces from coal to gas has been an on-going for years now. It is all described in the so-called "Energiplan 2000".

Besides that I agree with you :)

:2 cents:

If you read above, I am not saying Denmark is a good example of Kyoto compared to some of the other countries who also put an effort into it, but I say people are willing to pay to reach the goals about better enviroment.
You just take out one thing, one year, and say that is representative for the willingness? That is misleading. Fact is that from 96 to 02 it has been reduced by over 30%. The goal is 21% decrease from 90 level. Another fact is also that Denmark is a small country, 60 times less population than USA, so talking percents is relative when you compare it to the big "contributers". As Zyber also say, it is complex, and when Denmark buying quotes from others after 2002, means that they actually have to spend the gain on other projects that on sight reduce SO2. Wind power will not cover 100% of the energy, but it will reduce it. Besides that, consumers, including myself, pay more to import power like water power from Norway and Sweden. Also people getting more money is not the same as they pollute more, because now they can afford to invest in products like cars that is better for the enviroment. Did you know that you can't hardly get 98 octan here anymore?
Investing money in better infrastructure is also long term policy, and really many people take the bus or their bike to jobs and schools. No wonder they shake their heads if someone with 3 cars in their carport say they can't afford it?

I'm not gonna argue that nuclear power is worse than coal when it comes to SO2. That policy is based on other things (just ask the people of Chernobyl).

Be glad that the danish goverment is supporting the coalition in Iraq, and that Bush recognize this by visiting Denmark. You see the US and its close allies share technologies, and I´m sure that Bush would love to share the US´s modern nuclear power plant technology with you - this is completely different from the old soviet plants :-)

Also I never understood the reason for the fear of nuclear power... All people experience natural "background" radiation from including the sun, our bodies, and the earth. Typical background radiation level is about 300 millirem per year. The normal operation of a nuclear plant contributes less than 1 millirem per year for people living near the plant. However all people who own a television set are exposed to about 1 millirem per year from watching television. Why are the socialists not protesting against the wide spread of television sets in Denmark?????

But I must admit that I do not see any purpose in wasting more time pointing out the mistakes in your "US bashing" or "We are better than you guys mentality"... I guess if you are smart, then you can read between the lines, and see thru the bullshit - if not, then I guess you and other US bashers will be forever doomed to repeat your nonsense while the world keeps turning... :action-sm ;-))))

Yeah.. thank you Bush for inventing nuclear power :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Did you know that Bush agreed with Rasmussen today that something has to be done with AIDS in Africa, and it can be solved without condoms :thumbsup

not everyone happy with his arrival. goodluck to the G8 summit

:smokin

My thoughts exactly.

Dead eyes.