GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Officially Your Fucked... PIC of ME and a Question too: (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=485153)

Rebecca 06-25-2005 10:55 AM

Officially Your Fucked... PIC of ME and a Question too:
 
I think we had the first and ONLY real reality site. Nothing was scripted if I went out and shit happened it happened... if we had our camera or video camera on us it got filmed.

I started my websites for fun... with all the photos we have taken of me getting naked flashing or fucking and sucking other people in public that we have met over the years (at least 8 yrs). The people thought it was so cool I had my own websites and they wanted to be on my sites with me.

We have never paid anyone to be in them or hired any models. It was for the fun of it. The money we make from our sites is good so they are worth keeping up. But with the new 2257 I might as well take them down as I can never track down all the people to get two forms of ID's. Pretty much over 100,000 photos and videos are worthless unless I move our stuff out of the country.

My question would be... If I call my sites a documentary of my life would it be exempt of the 2257... or could I make it a news site of all the things that happen around our area in the public arena would that be ok? Or would a news site still have to comply... pretty much evething I do is in public. Its fun for me and my members love it.

Thanks,
Rebecca

Ps... Here is a pic of what I think of the new 2257... heck even the old one too! Enjoy

http://cumcruise.com/images/go_fuck_yourself.jpg

Sorry I wanted to show my full length nude version :)
.
.

AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE 06-25-2005 10:57 AM

Not good not good.

Your FINE though but no doc's not good.

eroswebmaster 06-25-2005 10:59 AM

ROFL

You've been fucking and sucking people on film for profit this whole time, showing it for profit and not once never ever collected any kind of model release, or 2257 documentation?

The new 2257 doesn't make you non-compliant. The old one does, your inability to run a business does.

Jesus Christ.

DutchTeenCash 06-25-2005 10:59 AM

no docs no site

jacked 06-25-2005 11:00 AM

pretty hot pic


dam censorship :1orglaugh

swedguy 06-25-2005 11:04 AM

Here's another guy that is fucked and need to comply to the new regs....


http://www.bitoffun.com/images/wei-fuckyourself.jpg

Rebecca 06-25-2005 11:05 AM

I thought I was ok because of all the girls gone wild type of sites and CD sales of stuff done in public... and wet t-shirt contest that were shot and they never collected releases and id's. I know this as I am in a lot of their vids and CD's and never signed anything for them.

I guess It will all have move it all offshore.

Thanks for the nice comments of my pic too!

Thanks,
Rebecca

body 06-25-2005 11:06 AM

more pics pls

pornguy 06-25-2005 11:07 AM

No docs= no promote.

Manowar 06-25-2005 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swedguy
Here's another guy that is fucked and need to comply to the new regs....


http://www.bitoffun.com/images/wei-fuckyourself.jpg

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :Oh crap

NaughtyRob 06-25-2005 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
I thought I was ok because of all the girls gone wild type of sites and CD sales of stuff done in public... and wet t-shirt contest that were shot and they never collected releases and id's. I know this as I am in a lot of their vids and CD's and never signed anything for them.

I guess It will all have move it all offshore.

Thanks for the nice comments of my pic too!

Thanks,
Rebecca

Softcore flashing in public is ok, fucking and sucking = not ok.

Rebecca 06-25-2005 11:42 AM

So if I take out the actual public sex I will be ok?

Triple 6 06-25-2005 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
So if I take out the actual public sex I will be ok?

'public' as in places or people?

:thumbsup

tedwinters 06-25-2005 11:54 AM

I still think that there's too much fear mongering going on :)
I have a feeling as long as no one looks remotely underage on your site, no one will care..
there aren't any bounties being offered, you haven't complied with the previous rules and nothing happened...
but still... I haven't been following too close.. doesn't being a member of the FSC keep you exempt for a while?

Rebecca 06-25-2005 12:02 PM

Anytime 5 years in jail is mentioned it rasies concern... all of the people on my site are way over 18 and none look remotely close to 18. I wish the people making the rules would make them for what they are intended and Not to harrass people way over the years of 18 and give them a hard time.

I did join FSC so I guess I will be exempt for awhile so I can take out the actual public sex stuff.

Rebecca

V_RocKs 06-25-2005 12:25 PM

I'd definately go off shore with it... and could be a nice change for you.... as in you follow it and go fuck and suck some exotic people in exotic places! I am sure your loyal fan base would agree.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 06-25-2005 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs
I'd definately go off shore with it... and could be a nice change for you.... as in you follow it and go fuck and suck some exotic people in exotic places! I am sure your loyal fan base would agree.

Good idea...Rebecca on the Run, or Pam on the Lam, would be good names.

ADG Webmaster

ProjectNaked 06-25-2005 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ContentProducer
Softcore flashing in public is ok, fucking and sucking = not ok.

What he said :thumbsup

Pleasurepays 06-25-2005 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
Anytime 5 years in jail is mentioned it rasies concern... all of the people on my site are way over 18 and none look remotely close to 18. I wish the people making the rules would make them for what they are intended and Not to harrass people way over the years of 18 and give them a hard time.

I did join FSC so I guess I will be exempt for awhile so I can take out the actual public sex stuff.

Rebecca

you are not exempt from complying with federal law because you are a member of the FSC you nitwit!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Rebecca 06-25-2005 12:45 PM

Kinda of Like E-TV V_Rocks... I could do a Special of the Top Ten Most Erotic Places to Fuck and Suck in the Sun.

Beach Freaks the Series Cumming Soon.

http://cumcruise.com/images/gfy-5.jpg

I think it will be a nice tropical change... otherwise I will have to make sure all the plant leaves cover up just the right places... what kind of unscripted sex would that be. I think it would suck :(

Kristian 06-25-2005 12:51 PM

As a lawyer, not gfy.

Shoehorn! 06-25-2005 12:52 PM

I hope this is a joke.

Rebecca 06-25-2005 12:54 PM

Whats that Kristian?

martyVP 06-25-2005 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
I think we had the first and ONLY real reality site. Nothing was scripted if I went out and shit happened it happened... if we had our camera or video camera on us it got filmed.

I started my websites for fun... with all the photos we have taken of me getting naked flashing or fucking and sucking other people in public that we have met over the years (at least 8 yrs). The people thought it was so cool I had my own websites and they wanted to be on my sites with me.

We have never paid anyone to be in them or hired any models. It was for the fun of it. The money we make from our sites is good so they are worth keeping up. But with the new 2257 I might as well take them down as I can never track down all the people to get two forms of ID's. Pretty much over 100,000 photos and videos are worthless unless I move our stuff out of the country.

My question would be... If I call my sites a documentary of my life would it be exempt of the 2257... or could I make it a news site of all the things that happen around our area in the public arena would that be ok? Or would a news site still have to comply... pretty much evething I do is in public. Its fun for me and my members love it.

Thanks,
Rebecca

Ps... Here is a pic of what I think of the new 2257... heck even the old one too! Enjoy

http://cumcruise.com/images/go_fuck_yourself.jpg

Sorry I wanted to show my full length nude version :)
.
.


you should ask your lawyer these questions.

Sosa 06-25-2005 01:00 PM

Should have known about the old laws way before these newer ones...

Mr.Fiction 06-25-2005 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
Anytime 5 years in jail is mentioned it rasies concern...

It's only 5 years, why are you so worried?

:1orglaugh

Kristian 06-25-2005 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
Whats that Kristian?

Hi Rebecca,

Sorry, typo.

You should really ask a lawyer, not gfy. Unlike a lot of people, you have the financial resources (and motivation) to seek professional legal council. :)

Big Red Machine 06-25-2005 01:04 PM

Being naked is fine ,spreading pink is not.
More Pics Rebecca

eroswebmaster 06-25-2005 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedwinters
I still think that there's too much fear mongering going on :)
I have a feeling as long as no one looks remotely underage on your site, no one will care..

The point of the new 2257 regs is not to protect anyone, but as a way to finally get those they want to get.

So if you're a throat gagging site, water sports site, maybe even a teenie site I think if you're even remotely on their radar they will come and check you out.

Obscenity cases have been filed in recent years, but they have lost them. This now will allow them a back up prosecution if they can't get the obscenity conviction.

It allows them to go through everything with a fine tooth comb and when you miss one thing bam, they have you.

It's no different than the zoning hassles they put adult companies through during the 80's. Just the beuracratic process a lone put a lot of people out of business, and this is having a similar effect. How large? We won't know until it's over.

nudecanada 06-25-2005 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eroswebmaster
ROFL

You've been fucking and sucking people on film for profit this whole time, showing it for profit and not once never ever collected any kind of model release, or 2257 documentation?

The new 2257 doesn't make you non-compliant. The old one does, your inability to run a business does.

Jesus Christ.

What he said.

Oh, and Carol Cox was doing similar to you LONG before you started the "first reality site". Get over yourself. :)

And without model releases, you are fucked. All it takes is one person you filmed to turn against you and your hobby is over. :2 cents:

Rebecca 06-25-2005 01:21 PM

Thanks Kristian... I will have to do that.

Big Red... I will put up just a few more silly pics of my public fun. Enjoy
.
http://cumcruise.com/images/gfy-2.jpg
.
http://cumcruise.com/images/gfy-3.jpg
.
http://cumcruise.com/images/gfy-4.jpg
.
http://cumcruise.com/images/gfy-1.jpg
.
Don't worry it was safe sex... I put a condom on the beer tap from the bar.

Most of my stuff is just harmless fun like this... and that's what bruns me up that someone wants to take my fun away :( I guess I will be drinking less beer now.

Rebecca 06-25-2005 01:30 PM

Nude Canada... actually the one time I met Carol I must say she was nice... and just so you know I have been doing it as long... my sites were just free at that time. It was just a hobby then till someone told me to make them a pay site.

Eros... Thanks for your reply it didn't go un-noticed.

CIVMatt 06-25-2005 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eroswebmaster
ROFL

You've been fucking and sucking people on film for profit this whole time, showing it for profit and not once never ever collected any kind of model release, or 2257 documentation?

The new 2257 doesn't make you non-compliant. The old one does, your inability to run a business does.

Jesus Christ.


Eros is correct,

You're an idiot... I hope these people come back and sue you for their cut. Get over yourself... and the 2257 is held so blah

Pleasurepays 06-25-2005 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
Most of my stuff is just harmless fun like this... and that's what bruns me up that someone wants to take my fun away :( I guess I will be drinking less beer now.

you dont seem to understand that fucking someone with a beer tap on film and taking pics requires a model release, id's and is subject to the same 2257 requirements which have been in existence for a decade.

Rebecca 06-25-2005 01:34 PM

no offense taken... :)

Rebecca 06-25-2005 01:35 PM

gezzz Pleasure... I am finding that out trust me.

sickkittens 06-25-2005 01:36 PM

It sounds like you're screwed. I'd talk to a lawyer.

Spunky 06-25-2005 05:49 PM

Very nice...we need more pics though

Chris Malais 06-25-2005 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eroswebmaster
ROFL

You've been fucking and sucking people on film for profit this whole time, showing it for profit and not once never ever collected any kind of model release, or 2257 documentation?

The new 2257 doesn't make you non-compliant. The old one does, your inability to run a business does.

Jesus Christ.




I think that the simple nature of her success and ideals of finding a loophole rather than to quit or bitch shows her ability to run a business. The ability to run a business shouldn't reflect conformity to laws and opinions of people in the same business.

Pleasurepays 06-25-2005 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais
I think that the simple nature of her success and ideals of finding a loophole rather than to quit or bitch shows her ability to run a business. The ability to run a business shouldn't reflect conformity to laws and opinions of people in the same business.

wow. this will be a great defense to the DOJ and federal prosecutors.

i did not know you had the option to "conform" or not "conform" to laws.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

TurboAngel 06-25-2005 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rebecca
I think we had the first and ONLY real reality site. Nothing was scripted if I went out and shit happened it happened... if we had our camera or video camera on us it got fillm.


You think you were the 1st? LMAO.


:1orglaugh

Chris Malais 06-25-2005 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
wow. this will be a great defense to the DOJ and federal prosecutors.

i did not know you had the option to "conform" or not "conform" to laws.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh



You don't have the option to not conform if you're a brainwashed conformist. The bad guys never get away from the cops either, well according to the chases I see on TV.

Ycaza 06-25-2005 06:12 PM

Hit me up if you want yuour stuff on a network in canada

Pleasurepays 06-25-2005 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Malais
You don't have the option to not conform if you're a brainwashed conformist. The bad guys never get away from the cops either, well according to the chases I see on TV.

let me see if I understand your position, which actually does seem to be quite well thought out.

1) not wanting to go to prison makes one a "conformist"

2) because "bad guys sometimes get away" - challenging the government while providing them clear and undeniable proof of the illegality of your actions, constitutes acceptable risk.


how old are you? 12?

does your mommy know you are talking to strange adults on the internet?

:1orglaugh

bdld 06-25-2005 06:26 PM

if you're the primary producer, ID's and model releases have always been required for sexually explicit material, this is nothing new.

tedwinters 06-25-2005 06:53 PM

Her site could never, ever, ever be compliant.. at least, not without radically changing it...
plus signed contracts are invalidated when the person signing is drunk :)...

Still, I can also imagine the conversation... "here, I just shoved a beer tap up your pussy... mind signing this form and giving me a copy of your ID?"

Basic_man 06-25-2005 07:01 PM

Damn, I'm so proud to be canadian

Fizzgig 06-25-2005 07:04 PM

Move out of the U.S.

You can say they have the docs but the U.S. can't check them. ;)

Rebecca 06-25-2005 07:09 PM

Thanks to all of you that were nice to me... and the ones that were not so nice to me.

I was just having fun... I was not trying to run a "business". Looks like if I want to continue having fun I will need to outsource (bad word in my opinion)... my sites outside of the US. If it wasn't the weekend I would have the move done already.

I heard of 2257's never took the time to read them (my fault) as I thought they pertained to CP and keeping kids safer, and not for adults having adult fun. Boy was I wrong... LOL

Anyways thanks again for all comments good and bad it was a hard lesson to learn but all points were well taken. I will be moving stuff SOON!

Here is one last pic for you spunky...
.
http://cumcruise.com/images/gfy-6.jpg
.

V_RocKs 06-26-2005 04:27 PM

Damn.. nice pics, thanks for posting them. Your reality site is awesome because it makes the surfer feel like a true voyeur!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123