GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - The DOJ will still have their FSC Hit List.

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - The DOJ will still have their FSC Hit List. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=485060)

notjoe

06-25-2005 03:48 AM

The DOJ will still have their FSC Hit List.

"Government agrees: (1) not to conduct any inspections, with regard to the Plaintiffs and their members, under 18 U.S.C. section 2257 and the Attorney General?s new implementing regulations; and (2) not to pursue any claim against Plaintiffs and their members under 18 U.S.C. section 2257 and the Attorney General?s new implementing regulations."

How does the govt know who is on the FSC list and who isnt?

They Dont, they need to confirm with a third party whether they can go after the person or not. The third party says "No, do not go after them" so now the DOJ knows you're part of the FSC...

Welcome to their LIST of people to fuck with.

jollyperv

06-25-2005 04:32 AM

The whole thing is really fishy

Tempest

06-25-2005 04:37 AM

Yep.. few calls to the list keeper and they'll know who they can go after now.. and who to go after later...

DatingGold

06-25-2005 04:38 AM

kind of like wheel of bad fortune..

jimmyf

06-25-2005 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DatingGold

kind of like wheel of bad fortune..

good way 2 put it

notjoe

06-25-2005 05:08 AM

Indeed...

This is absolutely no way to stop enforcement against FSC members without knowing who they are.. whether they're handed the list or the compile a list from process of elimination they will get it..

ytcracker

06-25-2005 05:11 AM

im not really that paranoid

this is an interesting post

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squirtit

I agree!

One of the lawyers for the FSC made a statement here regarding this. Here is part of the statement:

"As a last matter, no one from the FSC has said or meant to suggest that someone should become a member of the FSC in order to be protected under an injunction that does not even exist. While it is a fact that under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure only parties to litigation are covered by an injunction, it has also been amply explained by now that while technical limitations apply, the practical result of some injunctions is that no one is prosecuted while the injunction is in effect, as has happened with COPA."

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:32 PM.