GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Bush to sidestep senate and appoint Bolton, refuses to release info

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Bush to sidestep senate and appoint Bolton, refuses to release info (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=483129)

Bush to sidestep senate and appoint Bolton, refuses to release info

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...ryID=884049 1

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...9gT2g&refer=us

Quote:

"It's really critical we get John Bolton confirmed,'' Kyl of Arizona, chairman of the Republican Policy Committee, said in an interview. "If we can't get him confirmed, my guess is he'll be appointed with a recess appointment.''

"They put partisanship ahead of the Constitution and the Senate's right to receive information from the executive branch of government," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday of the Bush administration. "Unless the president comes forward with information which we're certain we're constitutionally entitled to, Bolton will not get enough votes" to end debate on his nomination and move to a decisive vote, Reid said.

Bush has on occasion issued recess appointments to sidestep Senate opposition to his nominees. He could do so for Bolton during the upcoming Fourth of July holiday recess or during Congress' monthlong August break. A recess appointment for Bolton would allow him to serve as ambassador through January 2007.

Democrats say no vote should be held until the Bush administration releases classified information involving Bolton that they sought weeks ago.

Democrats refused to end debate on the nomination last month after the White House wouldn't release information on Bolton's receipt of names that had been censored in intelligence reports. Democrats want to learn whether Bolton used this intelligence to intimidate officials who disagreed with his views.

They don't even have enough Republican senators that agree with pushing Bolton through. Why not just send the Senate home for the rest of the Bush term if their decisions mean nothing and all not the will of Bush is overridden? The only thing important in the world is Iraq anyway. :disgust

Bush is doing exactly as the law allows.
democrats want to keep undercutting him, they'll pay in the next elections.
note to democrats: keep filibustering, you make it easy for us.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Bush is doing exactly as the law allows.
democrats want to keep undercutting him, they'll pay in the next elections.
note to democrats: keep filibustering, you make it easy for us.

Yeah, according to all the numbers people are really liking the work of the guy who fancies himself a dictator :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras

Yeah, according to all the numbers people are really liking the work of the guy who fancies himself a dictator :1orglaugh

Translation: bah bah

Amazing how the US is more interested in " spreading " the freedom abroad than at home...
Even that is now a major OUTSOURCING phenomena :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by 12clicks

Translation: bah bah

There it is folks, sheep speek straight from the flock :upsidedow

54 out of 100 voted for Bolton so when does a majority not rule?

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Amazing how the US is more interested in " spreading " the freedom abroad than at home...
Even that is now a major OUTSOURCING phenomena :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Heh :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunkmaster

54 out of 100 voted for Bolton so when does a majority not rule?

When the rule calls for 60.

Another stept further :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras

When the rule calls for 60.

Well, that is not a Bush rule. So it doesn't count ... just like votes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Well, that is not a Bush rule. So it doesn't count ... just like votes.

http://www.ww1journal.com/awesomepho...al%20Fools.jpg

When you see where that comes from, you will thank me :winkwink:

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta

Well, that is not a Bush rule. So it doesn't count ... just like votes.

LOL :thumbsup That was the point of this thread. If we have a dictator why not send the senate home?

For The People,MY ASS:action-sm

We are Funding them to slowly imprison all of us!!!!:action-sm