![]() |
Dating sites & 2257
Sure once in awhile someone posts their cock...
So whats the deal on that? Do you fall under service provider? |
bumpidy bump bump
how is this going to effect AFF, etc. |
Do you use sexualy explicit content to promote them?
|
Most dating sites wouldn't fall under a service provider/common carrier defnition since they review photos prior to posting them.
|
As far as the sites themselves go, what I heard was they would try to fall under a 'reasonably manageable' clause (by saying it isn't reasonably manageable. I haven't looked too much into it, as it will not affect us in that sense at all, since we have nothing to do with the United States.
As for promo content for affiliates though, I think that likely, sexually explicit content offered to American Webmasters must be replaced by other acceptable content. Those are just my personal thoughts on the matter though :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Rock, your body body, rock your body body
Rock, your body body, rock your body body |
I think they are fucked.. none of them are speaking out.
|
Quote:
As for advertising, we tend to use ads that are sexy yet not sexually explicit anyways for our campaigns, so that's no issue. As for having US Customers, I'm not sure how that even applies. A surfer will not be prosecuted for viewing a website under 2257, atleast the way I understand it... Again, these are just my opinions though, not anything legal or from IwantU :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think if our Costa Rica show in November turns out to be a success, you might see a lot of programs and companies start moving down this way :upsidedow |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123