GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Fucking disgusting, get young boys drunk and sleep with them, N' GET AWAY WITH IT! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=480401)

galleryseek 06-13-2005 02:20 PM

Fucking disgusting, get young boys drunk and sleep with them, N' GET AWAY WITH IT!
 
fucking people. jackson needs to die.

Mr.Fiction 06-13-2005 02:21 PM

You saw it on TV, it must be true?

Wait until you see how the media portrays pornographers if some get arrested.

dirtysouth 06-13-2005 02:22 PM

:upsidedow :upsidedow

Icon 06-13-2005 02:23 PM

grow up
and Jessica Lynch was freed in a secret covert operation

the media has been bashing him for the past 2 years, fuck them and fuck you

dirtydesignz 06-13-2005 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galleryseek
fucking people. jackson needs to die.

you ar an idiot

propromotions 06-13-2005 02:23 PM

this is a sad day for justice...total bullshit. tottally fucked up.

Mr.Fiction 06-13-2005 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by propromotions
this is a sad day for justice...total bullshit. tottally fucked up.

A jury makes that decision, not the media.

You will be glad of that if you ever get arrested for publishing porn.

galleryseek 06-13-2005 02:25 PM

what are you people?


FUCKING STUPID?

I'm an idiot because I dislike a grown man who ADMITTEDLY sleeps with boys?

You people need to yank your fucking ugly faces out of your liberal asses.

BradM 06-13-2005 02:25 PM

It would have been funny if he grabbed the first little boy he saw and started dry humping him in front of the cameras with a big smile on his face and hand up in the air like he was spinning a lasso.

simple simon 06-13-2005 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
A jury makes that decision, not the media.

You will be glad of that if you ever get arrested for publishing porn.

thats your only arguement every fucking time, has it ever dawned on you not all people publish porn, and they are in the adult biz. :1orglaugh

Dalai lama 06-13-2005 02:26 PM

he had no 2257 on him, he's guilty.

Terry 06-13-2005 02:26 PM

how could they let him go????

propromotions 06-13-2005 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galleryseek
what are you people?


FUCKING STUPID?

I'm an idiot because I dislike a grown man who ADMITTEDLY sleeps with boys?

You people need to yank your fucking ugly faces out of your liberal asses.


Hooah! I totally agree with you dude! Its fucking sick to my stomach.

dirtydesignz 06-13-2005 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galleryseek
what are you people?


FUCKING STUPID?

I'm an idiot because I dislike a grown man who ADMITTEDLY sleeps with boys?

You people need to yank your fucking ugly faces out of your liberal asses.

You obviously don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. Must suck to be so stupid.

BiggleJones 06-13-2005 02:27 PM

Wahoo!!!!!!!!!!!

simple simon 06-13-2005 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirtydesignz
You obviously don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. Must suck to be so stupid.

did mike not admit to sleeping with boys in bed?

dirtydesignz 06-13-2005 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiggleJones
Wahoo!!!!!!!!!!!

:thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

Mr.Fiction 06-13-2005 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galleryseek

I'm an idiot because I dislike a grown man who ADMITTEDLY sleeps with boys?

The jury saw the evidence, and they found him innocent. You saw the TV and you think he's guilty. Who should we believe? :1orglaugh

Pornographers who are outraged by a jury requiring proof of a crime. :1orglaugh

Move to Saudi Arabia if you want people to be guilty without a fair trial.

Dagwolf 06-13-2005 02:29 PM

Reasonable doubt, people. :pimp:

Theo 06-13-2005 02:30 PM

An average guy would be in jail now in his position.

Buddah00 06-13-2005 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
The jury saw the evidence, and they found him innocent. You saw the TV and you think he's guilty. Who should we believe? :1orglaugh

Pornographers who are outraged by a jury requiring proof of a crime. :1orglaugh

Move to Saudi Arabia if you want people to be guilty without a fair trial.

:thumbsup :thumbsup

dirtydesignz 06-13-2005 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simple simon
did mike not admit to sleeping with boys in bed?

If you are trying to be technical....but I sleep with my husband every night, doesn't mean I have sex with him every night. It is dumb to say just becasue my niece comes over and sleeps with me in my bed, that I must be molesting her...give me a fucking break.

A jury of 12 people went over every piece of evidence and found him not guilty.... you should be so lucky when you are brought up on trumped up charges of violating 2257.

propromotions 06-13-2005 02:31 PM

still, this is not as black and white as the OJ trial. Anybody could tell OJ was guilty. I just 'think' jackson is guilty....

Jackson WILL LOOSE THE LAWSUITS...

Theo 06-13-2005 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
The jury saw the evidence, and they found him innocent. You saw the TV and you think he's guilty. Who should we believe? :1orglaugh

Pornographers who are outraged by a jury requiring proof of a crime. :1orglaugh

Move to Saudi Arabia if you want people to be guilty without a fair trial.


leave your kids to uncle Mike to babysit them lol

propromotions 06-13-2005 02:33 PM

becasue my niece comes over and sleeps with me in my bed, that I must be molesting her

your niece is not a stranger. :mad:

simple simon 06-13-2005 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirtydesignz
If you are trying to be technical....but I sleep with my husband every night, doesn't mean I have sex with him every night. It is dumb to say just becasue my niece comes over and sleeps with me in my bed, that I must be molesting her...give me a fucking break.

A jury of 12 people went over every piece of evidence and found him not guilty.... you should be so lucky when you are brought up on trumped up charges of violating 2257.

lame, and unless I violate 2257 with all my text, them im not scared. Ok c u n t ?

Mr.Fiction 06-13-2005 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simple simon
did mike not admit to sleeping with boys in bed?

Is it a crime to sleep in the same bed with a child if he wasn't doing anything illegal?

Do you think it should be?

Are you pushing political correctness again? No one can do anything that might offend anyone, even if no crime is being committed?

Offending you should be a crime? :1orglaugh

Drake 06-13-2005 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soul_Rebel
An average guy would be in jail now in his position.

I think you're right. But I think it's because the average joe wouldn't be able to afford to pay lawyers to scrutinize the charges.

I really don't know if Jacko is guilty or not and while I think that sleeping in the same bed with other peoples' children is bizarre it's not a crime (and it's obviously something the parent's of those children approve of).

It's hard to say without if he's guilty of not without knowing the facts, but surely his celebrity status played a role in the verdict. Hopefully we can hear from the jurors themselves sometime soon and get a glimpse of why they came to their verdict.

dirtydesignz 06-13-2005 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simple simon
lame, and unless I violate 2257 with all my text, them im not scared. Ok c u n t ?

Wow....I'm a c u n t because I don't agree with you....fuck you you simple minded piece of shit :321GFY

Mpegmaster 06-13-2005 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
The jury saw the evidence, and they found him innocent. You saw the TV and you think he's guilty. Who should we believe? :1orglaugh

Pornographers who are outraged by a jury requiring proof of a crime. :1orglaugh

Move to Saudi Arabia if you want people to be guilty without a fair trial.


Great post :2 cents:

Manowar 06-13-2005 02:38 PM

go michael

simple simon 06-13-2005 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirtydesignz
Wow....I'm a c u n t because I don't agree with you....fuck you you simple minded piece of shit :321GFY

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh another dumb bitch, weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Furious_Male 06-13-2005 02:41 PM

I wonder how long it will be before he cuts his next album.

taibo 06-13-2005 02:42 PM

i myself am ashamed with the verdict. no need to go into it further.

Platinumpimp 06-13-2005 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Fiction
Is it a crime to sleep in the same bed with a child if he wasn't doing anything illegal?

Do you think it should be?

Are you pushing political correctness again? No one can do anything that might offend anyone, even if no crime is being committed?

Offending you should be a crime? :1orglaugh

While it might be weird if it's not your own child...no it's not illegal.

Theo 06-13-2005 02:43 PM

That's the case and this legal system sucks big time (not saying others are better). Only a minimal fraction of citizens can afford not all Michael's lawyers, but just one.

Good for him to be out if he is innocent, but personally I seriously doubt the whole world is out to get him for no reason.

dirtydesignz 06-13-2005 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simple simon
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh another dumb bitch, weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Another simple minded piece of shit....weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee :321GFY

Drake 06-13-2005 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike33
I think you're right. But I think it's because the average joe wouldn't be able to afford to pay lawyers to scrutinize the charges.

I really don't know if Jacko is guilty or not and while I think that sleeping in the same bed with other peoples' children is bizarre it's not a crime (and it's obviously something the parent's of those children approve of).

It's hard to say without if he's guilty of not without knowing the facts, but surely his celebrity status played a role in the verdict. Hopefully we can hear from the jurors themselves sometime soon and get a glimpse of why they came to their verdict.

And I do hope that when we hear that facts it's not another OJ scenario where the Jackson is clearly guilty but gets off scot free.

GotGauge 06-13-2005 02:45 PM

Not Guilty does NOT mean he did not do it! Just ask OJ.
It means they did not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it..

loverboy 06-13-2005 02:46 PM

this is a sad day for anti_mJ supporters

:smokin

dirtydesignz 06-13-2005 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loverboy
this is a sad day for anti_mJ supporters

:smokin

It sure is...too bad for them :pimp

Platinumpimp 06-13-2005 02:50 PM

Also, lets not forget that the mother of the kid that was "molested" charged at least a dozen other companies to leech money from them. :disgust

Stupid fucking bitch, she should have taken the couple million that was offered to settle this.

Theo 06-13-2005 02:58 PM

Powerful people are more than often above the justice system. They are untouchable. You as individuals often excuse or justify the actions of someone just because you happened to have some relationship with him and here we are talking about someone with extremely high status and power. If you think the jury just saw the evidences and took a decision you live in Michael's dreamland. You can celebrate the fairness of the legal system every time it personally treats you as it should. Till then do not have much faith.

pornguy 06-13-2005 03:00 PM

Makes me sick to, but at least he was stupid enough to do it in the US, and not in a country where he could get away with it.

Drake 06-13-2005 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soul_Rebel
Good for him to be out if he is innocent, but personally I seriously doubt the whole world is out to get him for no reason.

The problem is that even those willing to give him the benefit of the doubt can't really vouche for his innocence because Jackson doesn't realize that you can't sleep in the same bed as children without people wondering if anything more is going on between you and those children under the sheets. Any man sleeping in the bed with a child and it's reasonable to think that something more may be happening and it will be hard to prove or disprove either way. He does need a reality check.

So I don't think the whole world is out to get him, but those that are, are very vocal about it. And those that are willing to give him the benefit of the doubt find it hard to argue in his favor because not even they can say with any certainty that he's innocent, if they're being honest.

SuckOnThis 06-13-2005 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simple simon
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh another dumb bitch, weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee


You've obviously got your head so far up Bush's ass you can't think straight. Like the smell?

Pimp Dough 06-13-2005 03:25 PM

stfu..........

pradaboy 06-13-2005 03:30 PM

if it's all true yeh

Downtime 06-13-2005 03:34 PM

yeah i couldn't believe he was innocent on all charges. i still think he's guilty considering he wouldnt' take the stand; if he's so innocent why didnt he?

After Shock Media 06-13-2005 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downtime
i still think he's guilty considering he wouldnt' take the stand; if he's so innocent why didnt he?

Are you serious?
Taking the stand is one of the very few things you ever want to do, specially if you are innocent.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123