2257 Regulation breakdown
 

does someone have a link to a site that explains (in cliffnotes version) what the new 2257 regulations require websites to do? I don't want the original document, just a breakdown of what it is requiring us to do. thanks in advance.

this is not a time to be relying on Cliff's Notes. This isn't a social studies test.

this ain't no DISCO! This ain't no FOOLIN AROUND!!

i know i was going to get these comments, not to be rude, but please keep them to yourself, it's not helping my post any....

all i need is a link to a site that outlines the new 2257 regulations.

look it up at the department of justice site. what are you.... a fucking retard? jesus christ, one would think that if you were even remotely serious about business, you would have no problem reading a few paragraphs.

i can't believe all the fucking idiots in this business. this is why there are laws like this to begin with... because most of you fucktards don't have the common sense or foresight of a 6 year old.

One of my favorite bands

thank you so much. :)

I agree with this. :thumbsup

If you're too lazy to read the regs then get the fuck out of the biz.

If you want someone to make you cliff notes there are plenty of first amendment attorneys who can do that, they charge around $300/hr.

shut the fuck up and stay out of this thread! i don't need to hear another dickwad like you telling me what to do when the government already does that.

Before I found this thread I tried starting my own version. All I got was the same set of idiots posting their useless drivel.

you realize that not having your shit together for 2257 compliance is a felony that can net you up to 5 years in a federal pen for each infraction? this is not a time to use cliff's notes.

Everybody bring it down a fucking notch. Cliffnotes (i.e. PLAIN ENGLISH) would be a big help to many people. There's nothing wrong with cliffnotes if they are right.

Yes, I realize that. I also realize that if you ask 3 lawyers you'll get 3 different opinions of what you need to do. I'd rather not pay money to those bloodsuckers.

Instead, I am reading the regs and trying to make sense of them. I'm also trying to get other webmasters to participate in that discussion, in the hope that a reasonable concensus can be reached.

If you don't want to participate that's fine, don't. But don't piss on the thread. If you don't want to participate, then FUCK OFF.

Anybody know what signifigance that little clause has for conten that was produced with material all obtained locally?

are you serious? "telling you what to do" - "the government already does that" - sorry buddy, but you are in for a very short business carreer and a very long relationship with a cellmate.

we live in a world with laws. break them and you go to jail. you dont have to agree with them for them to be valid. ignorance of the law is no excuse and knowing that simple truth, i can tell you that you already bear a massive handicap.

i wish you lotsa luck dumbass!

http://www.alcatraz.cc/images/500/Al...rison_cell.jpg

try this http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/p...ad-Only%20.pdf

no, that is not the final reg, that is the proposed reg.

Very good tool.

But a thought came across my mind. They change the law and have to give a consultation period. They then change it again and just say that's it?

Why no consultation for the changes, some of which they though up themselves. Such as;

And

I don't think either of those changes were because of comments.

You think they will lock legitimate webmasters up over 2257?... there are already millions of sites out there that don't comply with the current regulations, well over half in fact. The only people that have been prosecuted are people peddling CP.

Alot of the people in this industry don't realize they're breaking obscenity laws in their own states... You think you know so much? Post a list of your adult web sites and I guarentee you have some already breaking the current laws, we all do... how many people talking shit in this thread know the regulations regarding how your 2257 compliance and producers contact info is displayed on your sites? Font size in relation to the font on the rest of the page, etc... It's all in the existing regulations, how many people have bothered to read it in it's entirety on the DOJ site?

He asked a perfectly valid question... Instead of being professional and trying to help, you decide to take the school yard bully mentality to try and sound important on an internet message board by putting him down. It's sad.

Who's the better businessman? I'd say it's the guy asking questions and trying to learn, not the guy that comes up with smartass comments to try and make himself sound important.

ya you read the actual law and it's like reading chinese when reading official bullshit!this 2257 shit makes me want too puke!

I seem to have seen a free software program at one of the boards that helps people understand, setup and record their documentation.

It is Excel based, has a list of manditory data fields, and is pretty useful.

Built in image viewer as well to switch between reading the photo information and inputting the information into the database.

Now.. where did I see that??

Maybe do a search?

But you really do need to understand the reg.

I mean, if you drive, you want to know what a one way street is, right?

:thumbsup
got a WHOLE bunch of asswipes on this board

In a normal world I would agree, but this is BushWorld. They have an agenda to shut down porn, and there is a good chance that this is how they'll do it.

It's also very possible that the lawyers who are salivating over this are making it into a big deal when it's not. Dunno, but I don't want to find out the hard way.

Totally agree

I don't think there are any "cliff notes" for this around.. and I doubt there will be until there's some agreement on the major points.. So all you can do is read the regs and figure it out yourself... Or have your lawyer do it...

Fairly plain English version of 2257:
http://www.avn.com/imagearchive/23/1...00_pm_sent.pdf

the better businessman is the person who takes this shit seriously and has his business in order... not the idiot asking for cliff notes on GFY. Bush has made it clear that his government is coming after porn. 2257 is the first step in giving them ammo to start prosecuting. if you think the idea of safety in numbers is a sound legal strategy... thats your problem. you will be admired by sheep and wildebeasts everywhere.

the fact that there are many idiots in the USA ignorant of state and local obscenity laws and how many people are or are not in compliance and how many people have and have not been arrested has nothing to do with fully understanding the law and making sure you are in compliance.

if you think its a smart idea to ask stupid questions on GFY about complex legal matters when you already know that you are asking a bunch of retarded idiots that would be flipping burgers if HTML was only a little bit harder to learn... then i would say the problem is with you and him... not me.

:2 cents: :2 cents: