GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Adult Webbies Thinking About NN? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=479035)

timlover 06-09-2005 08:36 PM

Adult Webbies Thinking About NN?
 
Just wondering how many adult webmasters are considering getting into the Non Nude sector especially with the new 2257 laws. Considering almost all of the mainstream 18+ non nude websites should be exempt from the record keeping..(TGP and affiliate webmasters).........NN is a good avenue to pursue to cover losses this 2257 will be sure to bring about...

I'm selling a couple of my NN tgps.....as well....currently I have one for sale here at GFY in the sales forum.....this website has very high SERP's....

Anybody interested in learning about NN or exploring this scene....feel free to PM me or reply in thread...

kernelpanic 06-09-2005 08:38 PM

I'm going entirely NN/softcore. Dealing with 2257 and all the paperwork is just too much of a headache for what its worth.

How can we PM you? GFY has the PM system deactivated. Do you have ICQ?

timlover 06-09-2005 08:39 PM

[email protected]

ICQ #51245750

jeffrey 06-09-2005 08:41 PM

Hey get on ICQ :)

pornguy 06-09-2005 08:42 PM

I think just having your paper work in the right order is the best idea. It wont be long, before they come up with something to cover NN as well. Because it is online, and they want to tax you.

timlover 06-09-2005 08:57 PM

well the NN model paysites still have to have their records in order...

but alot less hassle for NN affiliate webmasters than XXX affiliate webmasters for sure...

jeffrey 06-09-2005 08:57 PM

NN is concidered Explicit anyways and needs to conform to the same law.

kernelpanic 06-09-2005 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffrey
NN is concidered Explicit anyways and needs to conform to the same law.

You should read 18 USC 2256

jeffrey 06-09-2005 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kernelpanic
You should read 18 USC 2256


Cliff note it for me.

kernelpanic 06-09-2005 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeffrey
Cliff note it for me.

Softcore/non-nude does not require 2257 documentation, since its not defined as being "sexually explicit"


The regs:
Quote:

2256. Definitions

(2) 'sexually explicit conduct' means actual or simulated-
(A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(B) bestiality;
(C) masturbation;
(D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
Heres a simple breakdown
http://boards.xbiz.com/showthread.ph...=&pagenumber=1

Quote:

Safe Conditions
A) Images that DO NOT show a models pubic region or genitalia.
B) Images that DO NOT show the model masturbating (in any form).
C) Images that DO NOT show the model engaged in sexual intercourse (including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal).
D) Images that DO NOT show sexual intercourse in the form of bestiality.
E) Images that DO NOT show the model engaged in sadistic or masochistic abuse.
F) Images of a topless model that meet requirements a-e.
G) Images of two or models that meet requirements a-f.

NaughtyRob 06-09-2005 09:07 PM

I am going heavily into it, hence http://www.softcoresets.com.

Softcore only content site coming soon and nnfeeds.com, non-nude content plugin coming soon.

jeffrey 06-09-2005 09:12 PM

bah, pubic region is showed all the time in nn


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123