Important 2257 question - PLEASE READ!!
 

If I have a thumb tgp that lists a softcore face only thumbnail, but that thumbnail was taken from a hardcore picture, and the thumbnail links to a text only TGP, which only has links to sponsor hosted galleries, which only have content produced before 1995, but it was republished in 2004, and my server is in Canada, and I live in Montana, but my bank account is in the Cayman Islands.............


am I still an idiot for asking for legal advice on a message board?

LOL, I read the whole thing before I saw the punchline... lol

the answer is 57

i heard that the way that the law is written, the 2257 compliance goes with the image. So even if you take out only the head, that the technical interpretation was that you would still have to have the docs (same goes with banners).

Now this gets into the "thought police", because what if you only had that headshot(ie someone provided it to you), and not the original, who knows what insertion is going on, all you can see is the headshot.

So its a gray area, like much of 2257.. and comes down to your comfort level of 2257 compliance. (insert the consult an attorney verbage here)

:winkwink:


Fight the Bodyless!

Brandon you really should have read the whole post :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Lenny2 you are one of my favorite posters :thumbsup :thumbsup thx for the laugh

LOL you take the cake, a serious answer to a joke :)

hahahahahahahahaha

Awesome question!!

yes, clever joke.. but really not that far fetched actually.


Fight the maybe i should take a break from 2257 threads!

Maybe you should take a break :winkwink:


Fight the incomplete readings!

OMg that was great man

:1orglaugh

okay...you made me giggle :1orglaugh

This is funny

Thanks folks I'll be here all week

:glugglug

haha i guess nobody saw that movie