GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The Dutch Voted ......... No (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=475223)

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 12:03 PM

The Dutch Voted ......... No
 
it looks like 63% voted no !

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThumbLord
it looks like 63% voted no !


I like that they voted no! It's good for the US! :thumbsup

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 12:06 PM

it will take some time to get all votes counted, almost 62% of the population voted.

directfiesta 06-01-2005 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
I like that they voted no! It's good for the US! :thumbsup

Tought you despised the French for voting no ...

Or is it just because the " F " 5 letter word was there ... :1orglaugh

Dalai lama 06-01-2005 12:12 PM

I voted No.

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 12:13 PM

well Dalai lama you were not the only one LOL

evanmorgan 06-01-2005 12:16 PM

usually with issues like this, the majority of people who actually vote on it, have little or no knowledge of it at all. Influenced by either, peers or certain media (tabloids).

Evan

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 12:19 PM

whatever Evan, if you think that all no voters do have little or no knowledge you are insulting loads of people in the Netherlands, but heh ....... did you vote ?

guschi2k 06-01-2005 12:19 PM

I love it :thumbsup

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Tought you despised the French for voting no ...

Or is it just because the " F " 5 letter word was there ... :1orglaugh

Well, with a few personal exceptions, I DO dispise the French...but for lots of other reasons involving their hypocrasy, overinflated egos, racism, rudeness, etc, etc.....

However, I didn't dispise them for voting "no" (please review my post), I just thought that they were making a mistake,

I also think that the Dutch are making a mistake. I think that it is symptomatic of some major cultural issues facing the EU that will cause them quite a few problems in the next 20 years or so in dealing with the international market with any kind of united front. I was having dinner with several execs from some large German banks in Munich some months ago and they were lamenting over the same thing.

It will also mean, I believe, that the EU, because of these issues will be far less competative with the US than they could be.... and that's good for the US. :2 cents: so again.... :thumbsup
.

Dirty F 06-01-2005 12:20 PM

Im pretty confident that 90% of the people or maybe even more have no clue what they voted for.

As i said before, these people are saying no to our current government and this has nothing to do with the constitution. People are sheep.

Hinc 06-01-2005 12:21 PM

WOW !
I made a bet last night itīd be 63% no.

(...and i even hoped for a yes...)

Sigh

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 12:22 PM

Hinc ...... you could have made loads of money with betting !

Bhelliom1980 06-01-2005 12:27 PM

I'd just like to point out that with with tariffs and quotas on a downward trend between most countries, free trade "trading blocs" seem tobe the way of the future. especially since many of the blocs can bypass more easily the requirements of the WTO. while there can be cultural issues regarding the setup of these things... witness the same complaints that came out when NAFTA was being negotiated... they usually benefit all countries involved in the long run.

pradaboy 06-01-2005 12:31 PM

:glugglug :Graucho

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Well, with a few personal exceptions, I DO dispise the French...but for lots of other reasons involving their hypocrasy, overinflated egos, racism, rudeness, etc, etc.....

However, I didn't dispise them for voting "no" (please review my post), I just thought that they were making a mistake,

I also think that the Dutch are making a mistake. I think that it is symptomatic of some major cultural issues facing the EU that will cause them quite a few problems in the next 20 years or so in dealing with the international market with any kind of united front. I was having dinner with several execs from some large German banks in Munich some months ago and they were lamenting over the same thing.

It will also mean, I believe, that the EU, because of these issues will be far less competative with the US than they could be.... and that's good for the US. :2 cents: so again.... :thumbsup
.

...AND JUST TO ADD TO THAT. I was just doing some reading, and the German Finance Ministry is discussing the possible failure of the EMU (European Monitary Union). Like I said, this is good for the US, but bad for the EU. :2 cents:

Libertine 06-01-2005 12:40 PM

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2005/WORLD/eu...lkvotes.ap.jpg

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 12:40 PM

well Michael Sperber it is nice to read you did some reading, makes me sort of warm and fussy inside but in the end it will be all well .......... for all of us, even for people like you.

DutchTeenCash 06-01-2005 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
Im pretty confident that 90% of the people or maybe even more have no clue what they voted for.

As i said before, these people are saying no to our current government and this has nothing to do with the constitution. People are sheep.

They voted no to the government, no to the euro, no to the new social security amounts and no to Turkey.

Shame all these things arent settled in the new EU law. Most ppl know shit yes.

pr0 06-01-2005 12:45 PM

What do you guys care? It's one group of really rich guys, v.s. another group of really rich guys, all of whom give FUCK about you or your country

its like a popularity contest in their circles

& you guys think it matters :)

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThumbLord
well Michael Sperber it is nice to read you did some reading, makes me sort of warm and fussy inside but in the end it will be all well .......... for all of us, even for people like you.

Thanks for the condescending tone, but, it's based on a lot more than the quick read that I had today, I'm 42 years old, I've lived all over the planet, I read all the time, and get lots of different sources, and I'm acquanted with professionals in lots of areas.....

I guess you didn't read my entire second post...

but then I'm sure you are better versed in EU economics than some silly old EU bank executives anyway.... What do THEY know? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Hinc 06-01-2005 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThumbLord
Hinc ...... you could have made loads of money with betting !

At least I made a round of cold beer :)
(silly neighbour said 51-49 hehehehe)

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 12:49 PM

well I am a couple of years on this planet as well, 53 to be exact, so no I am not a snotty punk, have had a good education, do read a lot as well but heh the fact that you are reading really makes me warm and fussy inside, you are an exception or better we ( you and me ) because I think that most gfy-ers ( with the usaual exceptions ) are not reading much

Libertine 06-01-2005 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Thanks for the condescending tone, but, it's based on a lot more than the quick read that I had today, I'm 42 years old, I've lived all over the planet, I read all the time, and get lots of different sources, and I'm acquanted with professionals in lots of areas.....

I guess you didn't read my entire first post...

but then I'm sure you are better versed in EU economics than some silly old EU bank executives anyway.... What do THEY know? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Are you seriously trying to present yourself as an authority on the matter? :1orglaugh

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
Are you seriously trying to present yourself as an authority on the matter? :1orglaugh

No....not at all, but I've had long conversations with people who I do consider to be....and I would submit that this makes me as well informed as anyone else.

evanmorgan 06-01-2005 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
Im pretty confident that 90% of the people or maybe even more have no clue what they voted for.

agreed

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
As i said before, these people are saying no to our current government and this has nothing to do with the constitution. People are sheep.

agreed, and the same happened in France and will happen here in the UK

nico-t 06-01-2005 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan
usually with issues like this, the majority of people who actually vote on it, have little or no knowledge of it at all. Influenced by either, peers or certain media (tabloids).

Evan

if that would be really true, holland wouldve voted Yes, since there was a massive Yes voting propaganda the last 2 weeks by our government.

Glad we followed all our own heads and voted NO! :thumbsup

evanmorgan 06-01-2005 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t
if that would be really true, holland wouldve voted Yes, since there was a massive Yes voting propaganda the last 2 weeks by our government.

Glad we followed all our own heads and voted NO! :thumbsup

The problem is, most people would just be guessing, its hardly following your head if you know fuck all about it

Evan

Libertine 06-01-2005 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
No....not at all, but I've had long conversations with people who I do consider to be....and I would submit that this makes me as well informed as anyone else.

It may make you better informed than the average person (may - I have no idea who the people you consider authorities on the matter are), but the average person knows very little about the whole subject, so that isn't saying a lot.

Dalai lama 06-01-2005 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThumbLord
well Dalai lama you were not the only one LOL

I hope so.

nico-t 06-01-2005 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan
The problem is, most people would just be guessing, its hardly following your head if you know fuck all about it

Evan

when so much people take the time to vote, i guess the majority exactly knows why they vote, something like 63% of the ppl voted... id think if ppl dont know where the hell they voting on and why, they dont show up

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
It may make you better informed than the average person (may - I have no idea who the people you consider authorities on the matter are), but the average person knows very little about the whole subject, so that isn't saying a lot.


To repeat what I said in my second post, I discussed this issue for hours, and in depth, with high level executives from several large German banks over dinner in Munich a few months ago. Those are the ones that I consider authorities.

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 01:18 PM

good point nico-t, although I think loads of people just are unhappy with the euro and the government I still think ( checking the news ) that the amount of voters did know what it was all about.

Libertine 06-01-2005 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
To repeat what I said in my second post, I discussed this issue for hours, and in depth, with high level executives from several large German banks over dinner in Munich a few months ago. Those are the ones that I consider authorities.

So you talked about it for a short while with a few businessmen? That isn't exactly saying much.
Oh, and for this particular subject, "hours" and "in depth" contradict eachother.

ThumbLord 06-01-2005 01:24 PM

punkworld ............ lamaar denk ik dan LOL

Nydahl 06-01-2005 01:26 PM

thanks god - USD will rise again

crockett 06-01-2005 01:27 PM

I haven't kept up with this whole thing, but from the outside looking in.. Seems like voting yes would have been good for Europe in general. Could have made a united Europe the next world super power couldn't it?

Postmaster 06-01-2005 01:32 PM

Fuck the EU. Let's keep our money ours.
We should definitely leave the EU and especially the EMU.
Vote for Geertje Wilders! :thumbsup
Respect,

Selio M

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
So you talked about it for a short while with a few businessmen? That isn't exactly saying much.
Oh, and for this particular subject, "hours" and "in depth" contradict eachother.


Whatever you say. These "businessmen" sit on advisory boards to the German Finance Ministry.

Nevermind, you obviously have much better sources for your info.

Rich 06-01-2005 01:38 PM

It's so great to see that Europeans aren't completely mindless slaves to the globalists yet. We all know in the US, anything like this where the corporations and the media are telling people to vote yes against their own personal interests, yes would win by a landslide. If Americans (and probably Canadians) were asked to vote on NAFTA, yes would have won by a lot because we're told by TV that it's good and we're too stupid to think what the consequences are. It's just like middle and upper middle class people voting for Bush, he's trying to take their money and put it into the hands of the super wealthy, but TV says he's good, so hum dee dum I'll vote for him. For some reason in North America we haven't figured out a way to slow the corporate domination of information. They tell us what to do, we do it.

God Bless the French and the Dutch!!!

Libertine 06-01-2005 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Whatever you say. These "businessmen" sit on advisory boards to the German Finance Ministry.

Nevermind, you obviously have much better sources for your info.

There really is no point, but I'll try to enlighten you anyway...
There is no simple single point which contains the entire discussion. You can talk to several Nobel Prize winners and still be wrong. Often, experts disagree with eachother, and that is even more the case when the issue at hand covers much more than a single area of expertise.
Believing that a few bankers know it all is quite naive and somewhat stupid.

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
There really is no point, but I'll try to enlighten you anyway...
There is no simple single point which contains the entire discussion. You can talk to several Nobel Prize winners and still be wrong. Often, experts disagree with eachother, and that is even more the case when the issue at hand covers much more than a single area of expertise.
Believing that a few bankers know it all is quite naive and somewhat stupid.

Don't be silly, you can take ANY subject and find experts that disagree about it. It made sense to me, and corroborated things that I had read, but OF COURSE you can't take a single expert view on a subject as complex as this and treat it as gospel

My only point in my first response to the people that dismissed it so easily was to show that this wasn't something I just came up with. It's basis was with people who really are experts in the subject. To utterly dismiss what these men had to say out of hand would be just as niave and stupid :2 cents:

polish_aristocrat 06-01-2005 01:54 PM

I am an expert in International Relations, I can give a long, detailed answer to this thread for $100...

Rich 06-01-2005 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Well, with a few personal exceptions, I DO dispise the French...but for lots of other reasons involving their hypocrasy, overinflated egos, racism, rudeness, etc, etc.....

However, I didn't dispise them for voting "no" (please review my post), I just thought that they were making a mistake,

I also think that the Dutch are making a mistake. I think that it is symptomatic of some major cultural issues facing the EU that will cause them quite a few problems in the next 20 years or so in dealing with the international market with any kind of united front. I was having dinner with several execs from some large German banks in Munich some months ago and they were lamenting over the same thing.

It will also mean, I believe, that the EU, because of these issues will be far less competative with the US than they could be.... and that's good for the US. :2 cents: so again.... :thumbsup
.


Don't you understand that what's good for bankers isn't good for 99.9% of the population? Do you think NAFTA helped guys in the US who work (lol, used to work) assembly lines? Give your head a shake man, not everyone is a banker. Unless you're in the top .1% of the people, many millions of dollars liquid, you're a fool for siding with the unregulated free trade policies of the globalists. :2 cents:

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich
Don't you understand that what's good for bankers isn't good for 99.9% of the population? Do you think NAFTA helped guys in the US who work (lol, used to work) assembly lines? Give your head a shake man, not everyone is a banker. Unless you're in the top .1% of the people, many millions of dollars liquid, you're a fool for siding with the unregulated free trade policies of the globalists. :2 cents:

We will just have to agree to disagree on this one. I think that the view point that you hold will keep more third world countries in poverty for FAR longer than if industries are allowed to spread freely to other markets.


In any case, I"m sure you don't agree, and this is going to get WAY too long to go into now! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Libertine 06-01-2005 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo
Don't be silly, you can take ANY subject and find experts that disagree about it. It made sense to me, and corroborated things that I had read, but OF COURSE you can't take a single expert view on a subject as complex as this and treat it as gospel

My only point in my first response to the people that dismissed it so easily was to show that this wasn't something I just came up with. It's basis was with people who really are experts in the subject. To utterly dismiss what these men had to say out of hand would be just as niave and stupid :2 cents:

The reason people dismissed what you said was that it was just some empty rhetoric. What you actually said came down to:

Quote:

think that it is symptomatic of some major cultural issues facing the EU that will cause them quite a few problems in the next 20 years or so in dealing with the international market with any kind of united front.
That's so vague it isn't saying anything at all :2 cents:

hova 06-01-2005 02:12 PM

it's not a surprise

nico-t 06-01-2005 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat
I am an expert in International Relations, I can give a long, detailed answer to this thread for $100...

i can only offer you my body, is that good enough?

sperbonzo 06-01-2005 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
That's so vague it isn't saying anything at all :2 cents:


That's fair.

I have periods in my day were I'm not as busy, and so I have time to post in between doing other things.

I don't have time to launch into long detailed statements involving such complex subjects, and so my posts can sometimes be read as vague. :)

polle54 06-01-2005 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evanmorgan
usually with issues like this, the majority of people who actually vote on it, have little or no knowledge of it at all. Influenced by either, peers or certain media (tabloids).

Evan


you may be insulting some people but I think your right that the majority was under great influence of the tendency and the fact that a lot of people were afraid of the consequenses following when Tyrkey joins EU

I actually heard on the news that the man in front of the "no sayers" was using the the fear of the fact that muslims would have a lot of influence...
The fear has grown along with the killings of Van Gogh and all that crap... I can understand this fear but it is not all good to say no to a new constitution because of some extreme killings made by extremists....
I hope this is not the actual case and just something going around the media


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123