![]() |
2257 doesn't even serve it's supposed purpose...
Let's say the DOJ goes to a TGP with say 1,000 thumbnails on the front page alone. They see a single thumbnail in which the model's age looks questionable. How in the hell would they find the specific record regarding that particular thumb? Most people just list their sponsor's 2257 info and that's it. It isn't like each thumbnail has a number or a name so how could they possibly find the information for a specific image?
|
Quote:
|
I don't think it was meant to serve it's real purpose.. With all that is going on with it, the cp aspect is a guise..
They can't even keep up with the cp networks that are in no way related to affiliate/sponsor type sites.. These underground networks are growing and they can't deal with it all... This new reg. stuff is nothing more than a sly way of doing just what they're doing.. Giving the adult industry a hard time.. |
Quote:
|
Thank gosh i use only text :thumbsup
|
Quote:
i.e. http:/domain.com/image/thumb/girl1.jpg -> photo set lm34124 image img01239.jpg performer 8734 The record keeping only applies to sexually explicit images... But the fact is, there's a number of contradictions that make it confusing... Like one set that says you don't need records.. but that you do in order to say you don't.. that sort of thing... it's a piece of shit document... still means we have to figure out how to comply.. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123