The High Court of the UK has ruled against any web, phone or mail order sale of porn.
 

http://www.pimpcafe.com/article2/art...p?article=3436


"Indeed, the only purpose which such an interpretation of the law would serve would be to damage the local economy in favor of the economy in France or the Netherlands," said David Pannick while defending Interfact at the hearing while also adding that prohibiting mail order would breach Article 10 - the right to freedom of expression - of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Interfact was fined £3,000 for one offence of supplying and £2,000 for one offence of offering to supply. It was ordered to pay £25,617 prosecution costs.

Pabo Ltd was fined £2,500 in relation to one offence. It was ordered to pay £22,314 prosecution costs.

wtf? all governments etc. running wild lately ?

this isnt a new law, they merely upheld it

wow not good

The Title of this thread is misleading.

The case was only regarding clarification of current R18 video regulations

But as screaming so poeticaly put it, 'not good'

You're in trouble when Sara Webinc sees this. Ask Colin. :1orglaugh

*sigh* this about the fourth thread on this board alone..it is about a physical video..not 'virtual' content and it is just upholding the law as it is as the moment. It changes NOTHING.

lol..I was writing my response before I saw this.

WTF?

It would be cheaper to get busted for prostitution!!

Why do they care if some chap wants to wank off in his flat?

Its in case that chap is a minor chap.

12345 heh

Yea I read about it yesterday. Retarded decission.