where is the boilerplate defining "actual explicit sexual content"
 

maybe, i'm missing it in my copy, but i don't see it listed in "definitions". can someone point me to it?

not opinions, i want an operational definition, because the whole statute relies on it.

seems like an understanding of this is pretty crucial.

thanks!

Google>2256>enter

2256 defines what is "explicit"

that was fast!

thanks!

(C) masturbation;

(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

ok, can anyone give me a legal, operational definition of C, E. ???????


e.g.

woman at mardi gras on the balcony turns around and lifts her skirt for 1000 people---she touches her mons for maybe a second, is this C or E?

woman sits on a sofa, nude, with her legs spread. no smile. is this (E) ?

same as above now with a sly smile, now is this (E) ?


a jury is going to have fun with this sort of stuff. :Oh crap

and who decides what is "lascivious"

whether she is smiling or the expression on her face?

oh for crissake!

as with all "pointless voter scmoozing" legislation - at the end of the day the lawyers are the only ones who benefit. :disgust

'lascivious' depends on the intent of the model and the photographer, and you're right, it's a judgement call. That woman, if she's a nudist and it's a family photo... not lascivious. If she's a nudist and you're doing a 'peeping tom' through the window and selling the image... probably lascivious. Err on the side of caution would be my advice.

you know, i just spent 8 hours decipering boilerplate predicated on a very loosey-goosey set of definitions.

I WANT TO COMPLY TO THE LETTER OF THE LAW!

subjective words like "lascivious" don't cut it.

if that isn't quelling of "free speech" i don't know what is.

And are breasts considered genitals?

considerings asscroft had the statue of justices tits covered perhaps they are :1orglaugh

No doubt i agree!

Mostly, it is in the eyes of the judge and jury.