GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Does Anybody Actually Have A Definition Of 'Sexually Explicit Depiction'? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=471865)

Mutt 05-24-2005 08:36 PM

Does Anybody Actually Have A Definition Of 'Sexually Explicit Depiction'?
 
Wouldn't it be helpful if the DOJ actually defined what 'sexually explicit' is before basing an incredibly burdensome legal requirement that could send people to jail on the term? You could ask 1000 people what 'sexually explicit' means and you'd get a ton of different opinions. To me it means intercourse, fellatio, cunnilingus, masturbation. It sure doesn't mean simple nudity to me or a bunch of other types of adult photography/videography. Simulated sexually explicit activity is exempt from 2257. If nobody knows exactly what sexually explicit is then there's no way to know what simulated
sexually explicit is either.

After Shock Media 05-24-2005 08:39 PM

Not you too mutt.
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 110 > § 2256

For the purposes of this chapter, the term?
(1) ?minor? means any person under the age of eighteen years;
(2) ?sexually explicit conduct? means actual or simulated?
(A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex;
(B) bestiality;
(C) masturbation;
(D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

kernelpanic 05-24-2005 08:40 PM

Just do as Bush and his DOJ do, ask yourself: "Does Jesus approve"

Mutt 05-24-2005 08:40 PM

hey - thanks. i knew it must be defined somewhere. now to read it.

reynold 05-24-2005 08:42 PM

Any lawyers and knowledgeable ones out there?

Mutt 05-24-2005 08:44 PM

um........... the sky really is falling. if this was the stock market I'd be long on NN, softcore single girl sites, softcore glamour, art nude sites.

slapass 05-24-2005 08:47 PM

Why does this make any sense? Minors cannot show tits on a porn site. So why is that one act not covered by the above definition? I am assuming the DOJ does not call tits, genitals.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123