Gut Feeling On 2257 Enforcement?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mutt
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Sep 2002
    • 34431

    #1

    Gut Feeling On 2257 Enforcement?

    i finally gave in - i was always one as a kid to succumb to peer pressure so it's time for my 2257 thread.

    as most people know 2257 has been around a long time and was never enforced - i've yet to hear or see of any XXX movie studio, web company,
    content provider/producer who has ever had that knock at the door for a 2257 compliance inspection.

    i think with these yahoos in government most people are pretty sure there will be some activity. but how much? do you think there's already an order from the Attorney General to do a certain number of inspections within a certain period of time? 100? 200? 500? whacha think - how widespread is this attack on porn going to be?

    i have no idea.
    I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
  • GatorB
    The Demon & 12clicks
    • Oct 2001
    • 18208

    #2
    Originally posted by Mutt
    i finally gave in - i was always one as a kid to succumb to peer pressure so it's time for my 2257 thread.

    as most people know 2257 has been around a long time and was never enforced - i've yet to hear or see of any XXX movie studio, web company,
    content provider/producer who has ever had that knock at the door for a 2257 compliance inspection.
    You are right there hasn't ever been even an ispection. even with Bush being in office for over 4 years. Now ther emight be some inspections becuase of the new rules and once they get going after people and not finding any underage chicks in legitimate porn they'll stop wasting taxpayer money.

    Comment

    • WarChild
      Let slip the dogs of war.
      • Jan 2003
      • 17263

      #3
      George Bush is going to put all of us out of business. He's just taking his time doing it.

      2257 is the end of the world, the sky is falling, get out now while you can!
      .

      Comment

      • billywatson
        Confirmed User
        • Aug 2002
        • 3281

        #4
        Originally posted by Mutt
        i finally gave in - i was always one as a kid to succumb to peer pressure so it's time for my 2257 thread.

        as most people know 2257 has been around a long time and was never enforced - i've yet to hear or see of any XXX movie studio, web company,
        content provider/producer who has ever had that knock at the door for a 2257 compliance inspection.

        i think with these yahoos in government most people are pretty sure there will be some activity. but how much? do you think there's already an order from the Attorney General to do a certain number of inspections within a certain period of time? 100? 200? 500? whacha think - how widespread is this attack on porn going to be?

        i have no idea.
        Well, this is a great question, and we need to look at the logisitics of it.

        DOJ brings in entry level people to knock on doors to inspect. They gotta be getting 40K a year or so in salary, right? And if they all live in Washington, DC...there's travel and living expenses to be covered...so let's say there's 10 DOJ guys doing this, they're at what...1 million a year to enfoce 2257?

        And assuming there's 10 guys, how long will it take before they knock on your door?

        Imagine how long it's gonna take to inspect, say, JUST Anabolic's records for the last few years...or Red Lights.

        So what does this turn into...a lottery? If you get picked for whatever reason...you better be ready.

        And geographics. I mean, if you're in, say, Seattle....but the DOJ knows the majority of the biz is in LA...does that mean you're "safe" in Seattle, but if you're in LA, get ready?

        Really, when you start thinking hard about this, it almost makes your head spin.

        I Shoot Porn.

        Comment

        • DateDoc
          Outside looking in.
          • Feb 2005
          • 14243

          #5
          They are already understaffed. There is no way they could hope to ever inspect everyone. I'd expect them to hit larger companies, companies that promote teens, or companies that someone brings to their attention.

          Comment

          • RRRED
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2001
            • 6754

            #6
            Thank God McDonalds is hiring.

            Comment

            • Mr.Fiction
              Confirmed User
              • Feb 2002
              • 9484

              #7
              What if they were to go after 25-50 of the biggest adult companies (online and off) in a set of raids across the country. The trickle down fear after that kind of bust (and they will find reason to bust some people) would shake up the whole industry.
              Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

              Comment

              • WarChild
                Let slip the dogs of war.
                • Jan 2003
                • 17263

                #8
                Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
                What if they were to go after 25-50 of the biggest adult companies (online and off) in a set of raids across the country. The trickle down fear after that kind of bust (and they will find reason to bust some people) would shake up the whole industry.
                The whole industry eh? Do you mean the whole industry located in the United States?
                .

                Comment

                • After Shock Media
                  It's coming look busy
                  • Mar 2001
                  • 35299

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mutt
                  i think with these yahoos in government most people are pretty sure there will be some activity. but how much? do you think there's already an order from the Attorney General to do a certain number of inspections within a certain period of time? 100? 200? 500? whacha think - how widespread is this attack on porn going to be?
                  To answer this question, Ashcroft was supposed to report to congress each year with a report on 2257 compliance, number of inspections, prosecutions, and so on. The following year his office failed to do so and instead showed up with revisions to the code. So we can pretty much safely bet the new AG will not wish to show up again in front of congress each year empty handed.

                  I am leaning more towards an operation such as what was conducted in the 80's with miporn. Right after the regs go into effect a fairly massive and well organized swoop in coast to coast of a pre-compiled list of companies all on one day, and if history is a guide it will be on friday as well.

                  [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                  Comment

                  • NaughtyRob
                    Two fresh affiliate progs
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 29602

                    #10
                    What if this, what if that. We are ready just in case.
                    [email protected]
                    Skype: 17026955414
                    Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups

                    Comment

                    • DWB
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 31779

                      #11
                      I'm going to booby trap my doors and windows and make them come in after me. I'm going out like a SOLDIER!!!

                      Comment

                      • goBigtime
                        Confirmed User
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 7761

                        #12
                        Originally posted by billywatson
                        so let's say there's 10 DOJ guys doing this, they're at what...1 million a year to enfoce 2257?
                        I think it was said before that they've hired way more than 10 attorneys for this task force. One would think they they would have at least 10 foot soldiers/door knockers for each attorney.

                        Comment

                        • thonglife
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Oct 2004
                          • 1566

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Mutt
                          i finally gave in - i was always one as a kid to succumb to peer pressure so it's time for my 2257 thread.

                          as most people know 2257 has been around a long time and was never enforced - i've yet to hear or see of any XXX movie studio, web company,
                          content provider/producer who has ever had that knock at the door for a 2257 compliance inspection.

                          i think with these yahoos in government most people are pretty sure there will be some activity. but how much? do you think there's already an order from the Attorney General to do a certain number of inspections within a certain period of time? 100? 200? 500? whacha think - how widespread is this attack on porn going to be?

                          i have no idea.
                          IMO, it'll be like online pharmacies. With the limited resources the various federal agencies have already, they'll be forced to go after blatant violators..ie.. providers with no 2257 statements or custodian of records contact listed. Even then, sounds to me like another effort by government to enforce the border, the end to the war on drugs, stopping file-sharing. etc.. etc..
                          Last edited by thonglife; 05-22-2005, 02:29 PM.

                          Comment

                          • basschick
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jan 2001
                            • 2540

                            #14
                            i suspect they will be going after small webmasters, too - because the government guys will look good if they can win on some of these cases fast. so those of us who can't afford the lawyer bills - and they'll be hefty - will have to take a plea. and then the gov can say "we closed X many pornsites" - it would cost them the least, and get some precedents going.
                            Got Gay and For Women Traffic?

                            Comment

                            • 2257
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • May 2005
                              • 79

                              #15
                              Mutt,

                              Do not worry we are ready and getting excited to start enforcing

                              Comment

                              • 2HousePlague
                                CURATOR
                                • Jul 2004
                                • 14572

                                #16
                                To anyone interested in "guesstimating" the likely effect of 2257, I would say look beyond the plausible number of inspections, and look beyond the number of actual prosections likely to result from such inspections.

                                Obviously, for a company to find itself the direct subject of DOJ interest is the worst way to be affected by 2257. But let us not forget the lessons of Nipplegate. Only CBS/Viacom was fined -- but how many other companies were ultmately "touched" by what CBS/Viacom did, for having to worry about FCC actions, as mere contingencies.

                                We need only to look at the thread activity on this board since the law was signed last week to know that we are already being affected. The disruption of "business as usual", simply for having this all to think about, could easily prove more costly to the industry -- in preemptive legal fees, anticipatory reconfiguration of operations, and the consequences of appearing to other businesses (outside of Adult) that we are under siege and a liability to work with.



                                I'll quote myself from XBIZ
                                The effect of censorship can be achieved without legal process and without even the articulation of policy. A climate that includes merely the possibility of political and economic reprisals, a climate of fear, is all that is needed to achieve censorship.

                                j-
                                tada!

                                Comment

                                • Mr.Fiction
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Feb 2002
                                  • 9484

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by WarChild
                                  The whole industry eh? Do you mean the whole industry located in the United States?
                                  Good point.
                                  Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                                  Comment

                                  • TheSaint
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jun 2003
                                    • 991

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by basschick
                                    i suspect they will be going after small webmasters, too - because the government guys will look good if they can win on some of these cases fast. so those of us who can't afford the lawyer bills - and they'll be hefty - will have to take a plea. and then the gov can say "we closed X many pornsites" - it would cost them the least, and get some precedents going.
                                    This is correct imo. They already took on Larry Flynt, and lost eventually. This time around they will take on the second tier of porn. If you use your home the'll will use RICO to seize it, as they did in the Virginia case. If your wife helps out sometimes they will threaten her with 5 years in prison, further encouraging you to make a deal.

                                    It doesn't really matter who wins, you loose.
                                    I have no signature

                                    Comment

                                    • latinasojourn
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Oct 2003
                                      • 3191

                                      #19
                                      my gut feeling is that you will not see random inspections.

                                      you will see targeted inspections of producers they want to pinch.

                                      and the 2257 violation will be the leverage needed to get the plea.

                                      you have to understand something, this isn't going to be brain surgery.

                                      all they need to do is go to the web, see that ex: iforcedfuckedmygirlandmadeherdrinkpiss.com does not have proper 2257 posted on his site, and they go visit him.

                                      they already know he has a technical violation of 2257 by just going online and looking at his site.

                                      and the thing about flying enforcement agents all over the country?

                                      no, each state has it's own federal offices, by district.

                                      the 2257 busts are EASY to get done.

                                      Comment

                                      • Robbie
                                        Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                        • Aug 2002
                                        • 20960

                                        #20
                                        I'd like to make a comment. We were among the first to consult with a certain attorney about adult laws. He now is the main one in the industry. We still listen to what he has to say, but I take it with a grain of salt. His job is to make money. The only way he can make money is to go to court. He has warned us of things over the years that had us in a full panic....and then nothing ever happened.
                                        Not to say it won't happen or that anybody should stick their heads in the sand. But we all need to be VERY low key. Eventually they WILL shut us all down. But it ain't gonna be from 2257 forms or watersports or fisting or any of the other hundred things I was warned were going to happen and never did.
                                        You have to use common sense. The govt. has a couple of options to put us out of business. I have seen it happen locally with topless bars. The first thing they try is raiding the clubs and shutting them down. Then it all goes to court and it's ruled to be unconstitutional to shut the clubs down.
                                        So what does the city or county or state govt. do? They start hitting the wallet. They pass law after law that requires the strip club owner to pay for a million licenses and they come up with regulations (like they did in Florida where you can't serve alcohol in a club with nudity in some places)....there's NOTHING in the constitution to stop them from that. Then if that doesn't work they go for the "nuclear option" and just pull over every car that leaves the club and takes em to jail for DUI.
                                        The 2257 is an attempt to do something similar to that in my opinion. Make all of our sites look like shit with a bunch of legal jibberish written all over them.
                                        But once they get done pussy footing around, they will go for the "nuclear option" which is they will shut our income off. Without credit card processors we are all done. It's just that simple. Recently this lawyer wanted me to join in a suit against IBill. That's just crazy!!! Why on earth would any of us want to go into a courtroom and EDUCATE the government on how we make money!!!!
                                        Please believe me....we are gonna have to jump through a bunch of hoops. But they are not gonna be able to shut us down with "pornography laws" without a long long court battle which they will eventually lose. Which is what the attorneys are watering at the mouth over. No, when they decide to shut us down they will just cut off our money. Why go around busting into double wide trailers to arrest "webmasters" when all they have to do is visit CC Bill and a couple of others and we are done?
                                        And think about this...what "if" they went another way? They could technically use the constitution to say that YES nudity is free speech and fucking bitches in the ass IS our constitutional right! BUT it is illegal to charge money for it!!! We would all be working at McDonalds! LOL!
                                        -Robbie
                                        ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                        Comment

                                        • latinasojourn
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Oct 2003
                                          • 3191

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Robbie
                                          I'd like to make a comment. We were among the first to consult with a certain attorney about adult laws. He now is the main one in the industry. We still listen to what he has to say, but I take it with a grain of salt. His job is to make money. The only way he can make money is to go to court. He has warned us of things over the years that had us in a full panic....and then nothing ever happened.
                                          Not to say it won't happen or that anybody should stick their heads in the sand. But we all need to be VERY low key. Eventually they WILL shut us all down. But it ain't gonna be from 2257 forms or watersports or fisting or any of the other hundred things I was warned were going to happen and never did.
                                          You have to use common sense. The govt. has a couple of options to put us out of business. I have seen it happen locally with topless bars. The first thing they try is raiding the clubs and shutting them down. Then it all goes to court and it's ruled to be unconstitutional to shut the clubs down.
                                          So what does the city or county or state govt. do? They start hitting the wallet. They pass law after law that requires the strip club owner to pay for a million licenses and they come up with regulations (like they did in Florida where you can't serve alcohol in a club with nudity in some places)....there's NOTHING in the constitution to stop them from that. Then if that doesn't work they go for the "nuclear option" and just pull over every car that leaves the club and takes em to jail for DUI.
                                          The 2257 is an attempt to do something similar to that in my opinion. Make all of our sites look like shit with a bunch of legal jibberish written all over them.
                                          But once they get done pussy footing around, they will go for the "nuclear option" which is they will shut our income off. Without credit card processors we are all done. It's just that simple. Recently this lawyer wanted me to join in a suit against IBill. That's just crazy!!! Why on earth would any of us want to go into a courtroom and EDUCATE the government on how we make money!!!!
                                          Please believe me....we are gonna have to jump through a bunch of hoops. But they are not gonna be able to shut us down with "pornography laws" without a long long court battle which they will eventually lose. Which is what the attorneys are watering at the mouth over. No, when they decide to shut us down they will just cut off our money. Why go around busting into double wide trailers to arrest "webmasters" when all they have to do is visit CC Bill and a couple of others and we are done?
                                          And think about this...what "if" they went another way? They could technically use the constitution to say that YES nudity is free speech and fucking bitches in the ass IS our constitutional right! BUT it is illegal to charge money for it!!! We would all be working at McDonalds! LOL!

                                          no, so call "porn" isn't going anywhere. too many ordinary people want to buy it.

                                          people in $1000/night suites at AAA hotels with pay per view, and homeboxoffice, and the spice channel, etc etc etc.

                                          but "porn" that is unpalatable to ordinary people (not mainstream fucking and sucking) but nasty degrading shit, will be forced from the landscape (for a while).

                                          Comment

                                          • chadglni
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Dec 2002
                                            • 6924

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by WarChild
                                            The whole industry eh? Do you mean the whole industry located in the United States?
                                            How about everyone doing biz with a company from the United States?


                                            Sign up here - Dating Site affiliate program

                                            Comment

                                            • Nate-MM2
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Sep 2002
                                              • 263

                                              #23
                                              2257 violations --> obscenity pleas --> RICO --> seizures --> filling government coffers

                                              When looking at the past doesn't help predict the future just look at the revenue trail.

                                              Comment

                                              • pornguy
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Mar 2003
                                                • 62910

                                                #24
                                                I dont think that they will go after someone like CE, Adult.com or the bigger guys. They will go after the easier targets. The ones that dont have the money to defend themselves, and more likely do not have the paper work together.
                                                PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                                                AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                                                TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                                                Comment

                                                • directfiesta
                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                  • Oct 2002
                                                  • 30188

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by WarChild
                                                  The whole industry eh? Do you mean the whole industry located in the United States?
                                                  You are not out of reach because you are Canadian, but only because YOU are a small fish ....

                                                  The three men were allegedly associated with Forbiddenvideos.com and Fetish1000.com, several years ago. McDowell and Gartman were found in Canada, though the assistance of Canadian law enforcement authorities. They now face extradition to the U.S. If convicted, Santilena faces ten years, and Gartman and McDowell each face a mandatory federal prison sentence in the range of roughly 3 - 7 years under the federal sentencing guidelines.
                                                  I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                  But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                  Comment

                                                  • European Lee
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Dec 2002
                                                    • 7133

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by pornguy
                                                    They will go after the easier targets. The ones that dont have the money to defend themselves, and more likely do not have the paper work together.
                                                    You mean..

                                                    The GFY'ers?

                                                    Good stuff, we need rid of the noobs and hobbyists in this industry

                                                    Regards,

                                                    Lee
                                                    YOUR TRAFFIC IS SAFE WITH US - CONDOM CASH
                                                    PUTTING THE GAY ADULT INDUSTRY ON YOUR PC!!
                                                    AFFORDABLE 2257 COMPLIANT GAY + BI CONTENT

                                                    Comment

                                                    • latinasojourn
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Oct 2003
                                                      • 3191

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by directfiesta
                                                      You are not out of reach because you are Canadian, but only because YOU are a small fish ....

                                                      yes, and people should know what got them pinched.

                                                      rough sex "rape" videos.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • WarChild
                                                        Let slip the dogs of war.
                                                        • Jan 2003
                                                        • 17263

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by directfiesta
                                                        You are not out of reach because you are Canadian, but only because YOU are a small fish ....
                                                        The three men were allegedly associated with Forbiddenvideos.com and Fetish1000.com, several years ago. McDowell and Gartman were found in Canada, though the assistance of Canadian law enforcement authorities. They now face extradition to the U.S. If convicted, Santilena faces ten years, and Gartman and McDowell each face a mandatory federal prison sentence in the range of roughly 3 - 7 years under the federal sentencing guidelines.
                                                        So it's your contention that these men were Canadian Citizens being extridited to the US to face charges OR were these NOT Canadian citizens and your example is as useless as most of what you post?

                                                        Canadians can't be extridited to face charges in another country for something that's not a crime in Canada. That is, if Turkey passes a law that it's illegal to have a website period, Canada won't be deporting me there to face charges.

                                                        Try for once to be relevant.
                                                        Last edited by WarChild; 05-22-2005, 05:06 PM.
                                                        .

                                                        Comment

                                                        • sumphatpimp
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Aug 2002
                                                          • 5235

                                                          #29
                                                          I thought Acacia already took out online adult?
                                                          Oh shit, thats right, alot of you weren't here for that!
                                                          Oh well.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • latinasojourn
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Oct 2003
                                                            • 3191

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by WarChild
                                                            So it's your contention that these men were Canadian Citizens being extridited to the US to face charges OR were these NOT Canadian citizens and your example is as useless as most of what you post?

                                                            Canadians can't be extridited to face charges in another country for something that's not a crime in Canada. That is, if Turkey passes a law that it's illegal to have a website period, Canada won't be deporting me there to face charges.

                                                            Try for once to be relevant.

                                                            good point. it is my understanding the the people extradicted were usa citizens doing business in the USA before they moved to canada.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • WarChild
                                                              Let slip the dogs of war.
                                                              • Jan 2003
                                                              • 17263

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by latinasojourn
                                                              good point. it is my understanding the the people extradicted were usa citizens doing business in the USA before they moved to canada.
                                                              Shhh, don't tell Direct Fiesta. He's busy hiding out from China, because after all it's illegal to be involved with a porn website in China. Any day now the RCMP should be rounding him up for extradition.
                                                              .

                                                              Comment

                                                              • reynold
                                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                • Oct 2002
                                                                • 51271

                                                                #32
                                                                A sudden shift of economic tide...
                                                                better find anophther job early on guys!

                                                                Comment

                                                                • KingK7
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Jun 2002
                                                                  • 6372

                                                                  #33
                                                                  I think you're all going to jail. All 2257 of you.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • thonglife
                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                    • Oct 2004
                                                                    • 1566

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by latinasojourn
                                                                    no, so call "porn" isn't going anywhere. too many ordinary people want to buy it.

                                                                    people in $1000/night suites at AAA hotels with pay per view, and homeboxoffice, and the spice channel, etc etc etc.

                                                                    but "porn" that is unpalatable to ordinary people (not mainstream fucking and sucking) but nasty degrading shit, will be forced from the landscape (for a while).
                                                                    Not to mention all the damn visits from '.gov' I see 403'd in my logs all the time. From D.C. congressional offices to overseas state departments, even the government wants porn but won't openly admit it.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • crockett
                                                                      in a van by the river
                                                                      • May 2003
                                                                      • 76818

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Personally I don't think there will be a lot of surprise inspections.. I'm thinking this will be used to go after what they consider obscene content sites.. Before they didn't win many case on obscenity so this will be their way of winning these cases.
                                                                      In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • latinasojourn
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Oct 2003
                                                                        • 3191

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by crockett
                                                                        Personally I don't think there will be a lot of surprise inspections.. I'm thinking this will be used to go after what they consider obscene content sites.. Before they didn't win many case on obscenity so this will be their way of winning these cases.

                                                                        agreed.

                                                                        get'em on a technical violation ostensibly looking for child porn, then trade that conviction for an obscenity plea to please congress.

                                                                        politics in action.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Scootermuze
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Dec 2001
                                                                          • 4513

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Some of what Gonzales wants will have to be cut from the regs..

                                                                          There are some proposed laws that the 'powers that be' know can't be enforced and must be tweaked... Being an affiliate of PE Cash, I would be required to have records of every performer in every video sold on the sponsor's site.. This is impossible and not even feasible.. So I can see some of G.'s wants and wishes pulled before it's a go.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          Working...