XPAYS-Did Paris give you a signed release form + ID?
 

If not arent you putting your affiliates at risk by giving them content you dont have a release for? These new 2257 regulations will be a bitch huh?

What do you plan to do when the time comes that you need the release form + ID but you dont have it to give?

I can tell you what I would do:

















:(

Another Drama thread that GFY lawyers will post on =-x

ahh good point, i wonder what they will do.

Sig to big btw

everyone know's paris profits from the video -

we have had 2257 since day 1

Paris is old news... who cares? :helpme

meh she is old news

Thread killer. :1orglaugh

Weren't you busted on GFY for distributing unlicensed content CDs?

xpays hit me up icq is 319-323-350

Post proof of her pic holding up 2 forms of ID and a Model Release Form with her john hancock. Lets see it Xpays! For some reason I dont beleave you have these things but mabe I am wrong?

Paris sued EVERYONE when the tape was released, remember?

Why do you think the DVD is available through Redlight District Video?

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmm?

Obviously XPAYS has everything they need

:2 cents:

buy my new faris pilton tape now

Does this mean all celeb sites willl be gone too?

Yes, while we are fighting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and a global war on terrorists, the government has enough Federal agents and public support to go to the offices of 100,000 pornographers and look at model releases for well known celebrities.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

That wasn't Paris, that was Rick Soloman.

Then the xpays affiliates won't be at any risk :winkwink:

yeah, cause they really need to

you really think a company as large as xpays would put their entire lives on the line, and NOT have full 2257???? you sir, are the weakest link!

I dont think thats what his intent was... what he prob meant was that its not displayed on the website..

While im sure xpays is legally covered to use the video , i would be doubtfull they have photo's of her i.d. ( and i assume this is required for 2257 compliance , although i'm not a lwayer and dont know how that works ) It's possible they do , but my guess would be they dont.. rick gets paid , paris allows it for a cut from rick. ( nothing wrong with that )

Where it gets a little strange is , the video was obviously not produced for market, so they couldnt have had 2257 documents from "before" the video , so they must have had it from "after". If someone was to question the "age" of paris hilton in the video , the documents would be from "after" the video was shot..

Not sure of the legality of this , but i'm sure xpays does.

Actually, it was the Paris, the Hilton Family and Rick

:2 cents:

It was a joke dude! I have been fucking with him from the first thread!

I think that sums it up..............

:) :thumbsup

First of all. A release form is not required under 2257. Secondly, In the proposed regulations, Section 75.2 paragraph d (pretty sure it's d) is a grandfather clause.

Go fuel some other fire. There's enough ignorant people already throwing gas in the 2257 flames.

How about if you link us to the law that requires a pic of the model holding 2 forms of ID and a release. In fact, just post a link to the law about needing 2 forms of ID in the first place.

You people don't know WTF you are talking about. Please get out of this business now. :321GFY

I love Aaron Matthews.

lol this is a funny thread indeed.