GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Why has GFY topbanners for UN-DERAGED shit? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=468505)

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 08:18 AM

Why has GFY topbanners for UN-DERAGED shit?
 
Nice to see myvirtualcard has a topbanner.

Since when do we support processors that process for 10yo russian k-ids?

For those who think I'm full of shit, I'm more then willing to post some links.

justsexxx 05-17-2005 08:20 AM

no shit? well I think links to CP is illegal and get you banned, but maybe some explaination will do?

Snake Doctor 05-17-2005 08:21 AM

huh? :helpme :helpme

NaughtyRob 05-17-2005 08:22 AM

Wow, thats fucked up.
:Oh crap

Dirty F 05-17-2005 08:22 AM

Uh ooooooooooooohh

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justsexxx
no shit? well I think links to CP is illegal and get you banned, but maybe some explaination will do?

its not CP, they process under-aged sites, you know 10 yo k-ids ass up in seethrough thongs.

I still remember they wanted to meet me in Prague telling me they were ABOUT to drop underaged sites. NOT.

X37375787 05-17-2005 08:24 AM

that's hot. then again, very little attention is given to advertizers when the dollar is right.

wjxxx 05-17-2005 08:25 AM

?? :helpme :helpme

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 08:26 AM

Sorry I was wrong she's 11 but I'm sure I can find some 8yo too... Time to mail Eric id say

h t t p://w w w . nastia - kitten . com / indexn . html

justsexxx 05-17-2005 08:27 AM

proberly legal, but sick shit indeed

Trax 05-17-2005 08:28 AM

why do you post the link
just because it is not clickable doesn't mean its ok

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justsexxx
proberly legal, but sick shit indeed

it's legal, theyre in CA so 2257 doesnt apply. They even told me so after I pointed out we have 2257 on every page. "dont need those" he said. I understand why now.

Any MVC reps here to inform us when theyre gonna stop with this shit?

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trax
why do you post the link
just because it is not clickable doesn't mean its ok

Cause this needs to be taken care of. I asked bout MVC before. Zero replies.

Its not cp and noone will see refs from gfy if its not clickable. And processing this shit is far from okay, I know that.

Mike Dutch 05-17-2005 08:32 AM

Yup , nothing illegal I see, but defenately sick and targetted to a certain audience you don't want to child to be exposed to

bringer 05-17-2005 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
Sorry I was wrong she's 11 but I'm sure I can find some 8yo too... Time to mail Eric id say

REMOVED

disgusting

Boss Traffic Jim 05-17-2005 08:42 AM

Interresting thread for sure :2 cents:

hova 05-17-2005 08:45 AM

thats some sick shit

Veterans Day 05-17-2005 08:45 AM

all struggling processors have done it once before

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trax
why do you post the link
just because it is not clickable doesn't mean its ok

besides : so its NOT ok to post the site but it IS ok to have banners here of the processor supporting this?

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Veterans Day
all struggling processors have done it once before


hmm you could be right yes, verotel went there too long ago... Ive mailed Eric btw, see what he has to say bout this

PatrickKing 05-17-2005 08:55 AM

Wow thats fucked up

Lensman 05-17-2005 08:56 AM

I'm sure they don't knowingly process for any of that.

Screaming 05-17-2005 08:59 AM

dont know really what to say

Veterans Day 05-17-2005 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman
I'm sure they don't knowingly process for any of that.

cmon, do you really believe that?

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman
I'm sure they don't knowingly process for any of that.

Want me to paste the icq logs here? I can post at least 20-30 other sites like that, they know believe me.

Roald 05-17-2005 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lensman
I'm sure they don't knowingly process for any of that.

Maybe they don't maybe they do, certainly something to take a look at if I were them or you.

Roald 05-17-2005 09:04 AM

money rules the world.

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuaShe
money rules the world.

sadly for some it justifies everything yes

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:12 AM

k just mailed eric 6 sites, took me 2 mins to find them so Id say yeah they know

After Shock Media 05-17-2005 09:17 AM

My question is this.
Despite it being sick and something more than likely none of us would run, build, or promote. With the fact that it happens to be legal in the US and abroad (for the most part). Why would anyone attempt to get the processor, host, or other third party related to it censored? Sad fact is it is legal.
That is of course unless you do not mind others wishing to eventually censor what you do because even though it is legal they personally do not agree with it.
Just my :2 cents:

Libertine 05-17-2005 09:18 AM

I foresee a processor stopping processing underage sites in the very near future :glugglug

Roald 05-17-2005 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord of the fungi
My question is this.
Despite it being sick and something more than likely none of us would run............

I think you would be suprised how many sick fucks actually promote this shit, like I said before money rules the world ;)

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord of the fungi
My question is this.
Despite it being sick and something more than likely none of us would run, build, or promote. With the fact that it happens to be legal in the US and abroad (for the most part). Why would anyone attempt to get the processor, host, or other third party related to it censored? Sad fact is it is legal.
That is of course unless you do not mind others wishing to eventually censor what you do because even though it is legal they personally do not agree with it.
Just my :2 cents:

sorry? since when is it legal to process or host underaged content?

JOKER 05-17-2005 09:25 AM

Why would you or anyone else be above the law?

They are processing legal sites, if that bothers you complain to the guys releasing new laws.

Do you think everyone outside the Adult-Industry agrees with CC-processing for Porn?

Guess not, still it is legal - and be happy about it, otherwise we all had a problem.

Long story short, you're barking up the wrong tree. :2 cents:

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by punkworld
I foresee a processor stopping processing underage sites in the very near future :glugglug

DTC Support (1691547) Wrote:
fine but i must say we took mvc off last week, after some complaints of webmasters

youre processing for underaged and not just 17yo

myVirtualCard (339460672) Wrote:
OK...Anyway, I hope to see you in Prague

that was February 2005

JOKER 05-17-2005 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
sorry? since when is it legal to process or host underaged content?


"Content" ?

Have you seen any marterial on those sites that show nudity?

After Shock Media 05-17-2005 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
sorry? since when is it legal to process or host underaged content?

I am not about to go check each site. If they happen to be either "artistic" or non nude sites then sadly they are indeed legal in the US. Even if they use very underage models. Feel free to go ask the ASCAP about it, who undoubtably would have already reported must of them if they were actual CP or fell under the guidelines of CP.
So again it may be sick but it just happens to be legal, no matter who they are catering to.

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKEREMPIRE
Why would you or anyone else be above the law?

They are processing legal sites, if that bothers you complain to the guys releasing new laws.

Do you think everyone outside the Adult-Industry agrees with CC-processing for Porn?

Guess not, still it is legal - and be happy about it, otherwise we all had a problem.

Long story short, you're barking up the wrong tree. :2 cents:

Coming from a german guy your reply doesnt surprise me at all no. 99% of the underaged shit is processed by german processors and german hosts.

Ill celebrate the day those german underaged processors go down due to some new EU law

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKEREMPIRE
"Content" ?

Have you seen any marterial on those sites that show nudity?

Content is content, it has nothing to do with nudity. Man your dumb.

pradaboy 05-17-2005 09:32 AM

I've sent this thread to someone at MVC, let's see what they think

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord of the fungi
I am not about to go check each site. If they happen to be either "artistic" or non nude sites then sadly they are indeed legal in the US. Even if they use very underage models. Feel free to go ask the ASCAP about it, who undoubtably would have already reported must of them if they were actual CP or fell under the guidelines of CP.
So again it may be sick but it just happens to be legal, no matter who they are catering to.

Not true. Weve been doing nonnude sites forever. And I can quote you a lotta cases where even though it was nonnude the site had to be taken down.

Read the TOS on your host, see what they have to say on nonnude underaged content. They wont allow it. None of the US based hosts do.

Theo 05-17-2005 09:33 AM

I dont like the site I saw for obvious reasons. I have to say though it is not sad thing this kind of content is processed legally because the opposite is something you don't want to experience.

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pradaboy
I've sent this thread to someone at MVC, let's see what they think

They know, they also know Ive pulled the links. The reps online even on icq, he's gonna post they are about to remove the sites. That's what they said 3 months ago.

After Shock Media 05-17-2005 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
Not true. Weve been doing nonnude sites forever. And I can quote you a lotta cases where even though it was nonnude the site had to be taken down.

Read the TOS on your host, see what they have to say on nonnude underaged content. They wont allow it. None of the US based hosts do.

Just because most US based hosts will not allow it, that does not mean it is illegal.

tranza 05-17-2005 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thinkx
Sorry I was wrong she's 11 but I'm sure I can find some 8yo too... Time to mail Eric id say

h t t p://w w w . IDIOT . com / indexn . html

Why the fuck would you post the link here?

Holly 05-17-2005 09:36 AM

Fucken disgusting.

You can also add Duocash and Paywide to the list. They're doing their check and phone joins.

There's a difference between free speech and exploiting a child. One doesn't fall under the umbrella of the other, imo.

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soul_Rebel
I dont like the site I saw for obvious reasons. I have to say though it is not sad thing this kind of content is processed legally because the opposite is something you don't want to experience.

We live in a civilised part of the world. I'm no fan of censorship at all, but this is something that has to vanish. Especially here on gfy.

JOKER 05-17-2005 09:36 AM

Listen, dont try to twist my words.

All you have to understand is:

If the law says its legal, you can't do shit, hate this fact as much as you want.

I did NOT say anywhere I think this is ok, or even implied I stand up for stuff like that, to point this out.

And to drag one of my citizenships into this is indeed a lame attempt to not discuss what I pointed out.

Anyway, with all due respect - you seem to be a little ignorant.

Take care.

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Holly
Fucken disgusting.

You can also add Duocash and Paywide to the list. They're doing their check and phone joins.

There's a difference between free speech and exploiting a child. One doesn't fall under the umbrella of the other, imo.

Duocash is terrible too, theres one even worse a german one, then again whats "bad" or "worse" when youre talking bout 10yo kids or 8 or 13. It doesnt matter, its sick anyhow. And it doesnt belong here.

DutchTeenCash 05-17-2005 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOKEREMPIRE
Listen, dont try to twist my words.

All you have to understand is:

If the law says its legal, you can't do shit, hate this fact as much as you want.

I did NOT say anywhere I think this is ok, or even implied I stand up for stuff like that, to point this out.

And to drag one of my citizenships into this is indeed a lame attempt to not discuss what I pointed out.

Anyway, with all due respect - you seem to be a little ignorant.

Take care.

I didnt drag shit. I live next to the german border, got many german friends. But YOU telling its legal so its ok, even though you know shit bout US laws and calling me ignorant is just too sad to be true. And so it happens most of these so called arty pics are made in the former east german countries yes. So I disgust the fact.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123