Pat Buchanan Questions If World War II Was Worth It?
 

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=44210

Excerpt:

"When one considers the losses suffered by Britain and France ? hundreds of thousands dead, destitution, bankruptcy, the end of the empires ? was World War II worth it, considering that Poland and all the other nations east of the Elbe were lost anyway?"

**********************

Buchanan doesn't have a fucking clue. If England would have fallen to Nazi Germany, and other key nations, then what Pat? Or if Hitler would have taken the Soviet Union, and had all that oil he was after to secure his further war plans??

Buchanan is an idiot with a short selective fucking memory.

I read his book "Where the right went wrong"

I was with him up until he started talking about how the Dredd Scott case was a bad decision by the Supreme Court.

He's really out there now in his old age.

maybe that's his idea of utopia. what a lovely man.

either that or he's just a complete fucking nut job.

Hmmmm.....he does have an interesting point.
With the exceptions of Britain and France all of the countries that were liberated during the war fell under the Iron Curtain shortly afterwards.

So we would have had a cold war with Germany instead of Russia.

Looking at it strictly from the point of view of how many lives were lost and how much money it cost us (as opposed to looking at it in terms of right and wrong) it's possible we would have come out ahead by not getting involved.

Hitler was about to get nuclear weapons, I don't think he would have hesitated to use them on anyone including the US. So, of course it was not only worth it for the US to get involved, but it was also vital !!
Buchanan should stick to poisoning the caribous in Alaska :2 cents:

Buchanan has been poisoning caribou?

Hitler would have had the bomb much earlier then anyone else. But, the scientists developing the technology in Germany were Jewish, and so Hitler rejected it as 'Jewish' science... These scientists later defected to the US.

So you're saying that the Taney Supreme Court was RIGHT re Dredd Scott?

Wait, I'm sorry, I fucked that up.

It was Brown V. Board of Education......dunno why I was thinking of Dredd Scott.....my apologies.

is that taken out of context? is that comparing the losses in wwII to the losses in iraq?

only on the second weekend of the month - he's a very busy man

Hitler wasn't even close. Thier top guy didn't have a fucking clue. They abandoned nukes 2 years before the war ended.

Of course these Buchanan comments come on the heels of Bush?s European trip where he criticized FDR openly and said America didn?t do enough during World War II. Can you imagine the hell that would have broke loose if some Democratic President had gone overseas and said America hadn?t done enough during WW II and then criticized some former Republican president. Right wing radio & Fox news would be screaming for weeks about how such a President dishonored the sacrifice of WW II vets and how it was traitorous of the President to criticize America on foreign soil. Of course since it is Bush he gets a free pass.

Bush couldn't hold FDR's jockstrap.

Bush couldn't hold Chester A. Athur's jockstrap.

Europe would be all Russian if there hadnt been an allied response

Bush DOES hold Dick Cheney's jock strap. :Graucho