GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Hegre Archives... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=466191)

X37375787 05-11-2005 02:41 AM

Hegre Archives...
 
Anybody else find something really odd about this series that I found browsing through their archives.

http://www.traumata.com/hegre.gif


Don't missunderstand me, I love Petter and his work, was a member myself... but child pictures among legal nudes is not something that should be posted on a porn site. Just find it odd.

DarkJedi 05-11-2005 02:56 AM

They aren't nude.

I think it's like a models portfolio.

X37375787 05-11-2005 03:04 AM

I can tell they are not nude, but I still find it odd to display her child pictures along with her nudes.

pradaboy 05-11-2005 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vladimir
I can tell they are not nude, but I still find it odd to display her child pictures along with her nudes.

I agree... they do not belong there

Mutt 05-11-2005 03:25 AM

people get so hysterical about child porn it's irrational. Playboy from the very beginning showed pics of the Playmates as children and teenagers. I loved seeing those pics, to see how the girls evolved, most of them were kinda ugly duckling types. I haven't seen a Playboy magazine in a long time - not sure if they still do it - be dumb if they didn't.

X37375787 05-11-2005 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt
people get so hysterical about child porn it's irrational. Playboy from the very beginning showed pics of the Playmates as children and teenagers. I loved seeing those pics, to see how the girls evolved, most of them were kinda ugly duckling types. I haven't seen a Playboy magazine in a long time - not sure if they still do it - be dumb if they didn't.

Mutt, get off the high horse. Did I make a reference to CP? Did I claim there were underage nudes?

DarkJedi 05-11-2005 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vladimir
Mutt, get off the high horse. Did I make a reference to CP? Did I claim there were underage nudes?

Then what makes you feel uneasy about the pics ?

Get one thing: it's not a "porn" site. It's more of an "art" site.
What you see is an artistic model portfolio.

RevSand 05-11-2005 03:42 AM

It seems odd but its really not if its done in context like playboy does..

MaDalton 05-11-2005 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt
people get so hysterical about child porn it's irrational. Playboy from the very beginning showed pics of the Playmates as children and teenagers. I loved seeing those pics, to see how the girls evolved, most of them were kinda ugly duckling types. I haven't seen a Playboy magazine in a long time - not sure if they still do it - be dumb if they didn't.


i couldn't agree more. :2 cents:

Mutt 05-11-2005 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vladimir
Mutt, get off the high horse. Did I make a reference to CP? Did I claim there were underage nudes?

then what were you so concerned about to make a post about it for?

oyvind 05-11-2005 01:23 PM

Hi!
thanks for letting me know about those...this image series are straight from her book project so i guess they have ended on the web with a mistake.

have removed them now :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123