![]() |
the usage and unusage of "www."
lets say you trade hard links with another webmaster.
say his site's domain is site.com unless specified otherwise, will you link to his site as so: http://site.com or as so: http://www.site.com this question is important for something i'm doing - even though it might seem retarded |
depends on the site i guess
|
IIRC, GoogleBot treats all these URLs as totally different:
http://site.com http://www.site.com/ http://www.site.com/index.shtml http://www.site.com/index.html http://www.site.com/index.htm http://www.site.com/index.asp http://www.site.com/index.php etc |
I find various links to my sites that are done in both methods... some people are just to laze and some insist on the www.
There doesn't seem to be any one right choice. |
Just 301 redirect any link without www. to one with it via htaccess
|
Take fireorange's advice. Google will then see all the pages as one and create one PR value for it.
|
Quote:
|
I think you should have the 'www.' subdomain set up as an alias in the htconf.
|
would'nt I lose the $_server["HTTP_REFERER"] by usinga 301 ? i'm using a trade script and have to have that
|
I always link with the www
|
If you are trading and/or linking, get the URL the other site wants used and do the same yourself - tell them which URL to use for you.
No mystery, no confusions. Getting it wrong can waste a lot of potential rank passing. Also be sure that your server is set up correct according to what style you use for your links. If you use 'Domain.com' - make that the server name and the 'www' the alias. Most servers are set up the other way by default. This will ensure that any URL fixups (paths without a trailing slash) will use the domain the way you want it. -Dino |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I ask what the webmaster wants. Some want with, some without.
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123