GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Help. Does anyone know what program was used to make this? (clip inside) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=463085)

DeadFidel 05-03-2005 03:56 AM

Help. Does anyone know what program was used to make this? (clip inside)
 
I realize they are morphs and see the black edges used to connect the two clips together.
Anyone know what software can handle this task? I tried once animating several faked stills into a .gif, but it took forever and the results sucked.

Celeb-Fake-clips

EROTEEK 05-03-2005 04:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeadFidel
I realize they are morphs and see the black edges used to connect the two clips together.
Anyone know what software can handle this task? I tried once animating several faked stills into a .gif, but it took forever and the results sucked.

Celeb-Fake-clips

hmmm, i can see no traces of morphing there, morphing is when a character transforms into another character under your eyes...those can be done in any program that supports motion tracking analysis.. MatchMover for example or Kaydara Filmbox...also a number of plugins for Maya, Max... Houdini also if i remember well, it's no child's play though, the motion tracking is kinda difficult to master, also lots of work to find suitable clips in terms of similar lightning, camera position and so on... and of course, some tweaking, colour balancing, and there you are...

DeadFidel 05-03-2005 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EROTEEK
hmmm, i can see no traces of morphing there, morphing is when a character transforms into another character under your eyes...those can be done in any program that supports motion tracking analysis.. MatchMover for example or Kaydara Filmbox...also a number of plugins for Maya, Max... Houdini also if i remember well, it's no child's play though, the motion tracking is kinda difficult to master, also lots of work to find suitable clips in terms of similar lightning, camera position and so on... and of course, some tweaking, colour balancing, and there you are...

I understand the difficulty; involved you sumed it up well. " also lots of work to find suitable clips in terms of similar lightning, camera position and so on", thats why the ones seen are just average.
I have almost mastered vegas and can twick any clip to look like another, so I was thinking start with the oringal, and having my own models to stand in, it may be fun. I'll keep looking. Thanks for your efforts :thumbsup

abyss_al 05-03-2005 05:22 AM

chromakey, greenscreen software (easy to do, but takes time and patience to get it right) :winkwink:

crockett 05-03-2005 06:24 AM

lol what's the deal with these chicks.. everyone of them was yapping at the mouth to someone off screen, while getting pounded :1orglaugh

DeadFidel 05-03-2005 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett
lol what's the deal with these chicks.. everyone of them was yapping at the mouth to someone off screen, while getting pounded :1orglaugh

Most ot the clips are from TALK SHOWs..I downloaded the free trial from greenscreen..but that shit is not easy,... trying. You need to mix black to green/blue and then it becomes fun. I'm having a goof with it. :1orglaugh

Mefo 05-03-2005 07:29 AM

lol the hardest part is probably to find some good movies from the celebs

Meta Ridley 05-03-2005 08:40 AM

Wheres the sound??????????

RawAlex 05-03-2005 08:52 AM

I have a large green screen here I have used for shooting some mainstream stuff, you need VERY GOOD software to use that. This isn't really a greenscreen technique, more of a "tracking" issue. Basically, you find clips as described above (similar colors, etc) and you mask out the original head. You then map the celeb head into place. Advance technique is to use the motion of the original head (usually eyes or nose) to provide a realistic movement to the head that would match the original clip. Issues happen if your original mask is too large (lose some backgroup) or the replacement head has motion in it (which you can fix by first running this through image stabilization and tracking software to remove all the movement that exists).

It really isn't the toughest thing to do, but it takes a ton of time to do properly with much mroe time in research.

Alex

wedouglas 05-03-2005 09:01 AM

its easy to do...any compositig software will suffice...its just drawing masks and tracking them...nothing special.

Verbal 05-03-2005 09:06 AM

It was probably done using Adobe's After Effects. The heads we're removed by a method called rotoscoping. It's a very time-consuming process where you have to keep altering the mask, frame after frame to remove it manually from the background. The motion-tracking is a very simple 'effect' in AE ... many compositing softwares will do the same thing.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123