![]() |
A little physics thing to think about
A train is approaching you at 30m/s
The train conductor shines a flashlight at you and throws a ball at you, speed of the light is 3x10^8m/s, speed of the ball is 10m/s what is the apparant speed of a) the ball b) the light from your perspective? the ball speed is 40m/s the light speed is still 3x10^8 m/s (not 3x10^8 m/s + 40m/s) back to work! |
Thats the crazy thing about light, it's always going the same speed from everyones perspective.
I read the reason for this once but can't remember ,, fill me in please. |
well, the speed of light would be 3x10^8m/s (although it would be slower in a real situation)
and assuming your speed of the ball is relative to the train conductor, and towards you, it would be 40m/s what is the point of this? |
Not to sound stupid but if the train is going 30m/s and the ball is going 10m/s wouldn't the train run into the ball?
|
Quote:
The point is if you are traveling towards someone and 10,000 mph and throw a ball in the same direction at 50mph,, the ball will come at that person at 50 mph plus 10,000 mph for a total of 10,050 mph. This DOES NOT HAPPEN with light,, its always traveling at the same speed no matter what perspective you are measuring it from. |
Quote:
Not if you throw it from the train :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What dont you understand? He makes perfect sense: |
This is why i stick to porn...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I guess so. It's pretty simple. A train comes at you at 30 m/s, the conductor throws a ball at you at 10 m/s. The ball move at you at 40 m/s Whats so difficult? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ok to make this very simple lets just assume light travels at 10 m/s. A train comes at you at 30 m/s, the conductor shines a light at you at 10 m/s. You would assume the light would be traveling to you at 40 m/s like the ball, or sound, or anything else. But it is still only traveling to you at 10 m/s. If you don't see what the big deal is that's fine but this is one of the biggest scientific discoveries of the century. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ok you just don't get it I give up. |
Quote:
http://www.mensa.org/workout2.php? I got 26. http://www.highiqsociety.org/noflash...iqtests.htm?IQ don't remember the score but was enough to get in. |
Quote:
Dude big fucking deal Ive taken this test and many like it. I aced the mensa pre test and have been asked to to join many times, but I realized dont need to pay some group an annual fee so I can brag about how smart I am on internet forums. You almost have to be a dumbass to pay someone to tell people you are smart. Get over yourself |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're amusing at best. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
No dipshit,,,you got it wrong again,,,,, EVERYONE else gets it, and I have to dumb it down for YOU |
I genuinely wish I knew how to answer questions like that
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I got it, I got it, fucking MORON. Geez you are too stupid to even get that. I'm sure a 5 year old is AMAZED how 2+2=4. A 10 year old should not. You're the 10 year old that is still AMAZED by 2+2=4. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Terrible analogy. |
Quote:
I never said anyone was a moron,,, I was trying to explain it to you cause youre first post sounded like you had no clue,, then you come in bragging about you mediocre IQ and mensa, haha give me a break. |
Quote:
2+2 = 2 thats whats amazing as an innocent bystander, ill throw in my 2 cents gator, you arent quite grasping whats being said here.. lets say the speed of light was 100m/s. if youre in a train (10/ms) and u throw a ball at someone in front of u while on the train (the person is say on the train tracks in front of the train), that ball will come at him at 20m/s (10+10). if you shine light at him, that light will not come at him at 100+10=110m/s, itll come at him at 100m/s |
Quote:
Much better analogy :thumbsup |
This thread turned into an ugly dick swinging competition pretty fast.
|
Quote:
When I was in school and I had to do math problems the way the book said to do them I had a hard time. I had better quicker ways of solving the problem and mostly in my head. Now when I had to explain HOW I did it or show my work I couldn't. I honestly could not show in a way that would make any sense to anyone else why my way worked. So if I am deficient in anything it's my ability to articulate myself in a way so that people "get it" when I say something. Some do others just act like jerks. |
Quote:
:1orglaugh You called me Mr. Smartypants. :1orglaugh And who the hell are you quoting BTW? |
Quote:
Light doesn't have inertia and the speed of the ball thrown from the train has nothing to do with either objects' inertia. The relevant factor here is velocity, not inertia or momentum. When you throw the ball at 10m/s, the ball is already moving at 30m/s relative to the stationary observer. So, you are adding 10m/s to the 30m/s the ball is already travelling at. Light, however, always appears to be moving at the same speed no matter what the motion of the observer. For instance, if you are going 35MPH and someone passes you at 40MPH, the person passing you appears to be going 5MPH. However, if you are travelling 35MPH and a beam of light were to pass you, the beam of light would appear to be going 670,616,629 miles per hour, not 670,616,629-35 miles per hour. The speed of light in a vacuum is constant and your speed relative to the light has no effect on the light's apparent speed. SpaceAce |
Quote:
|
Quote:
its always always always 3x10^8 m/s.. to compensate, time changes, speed of light does not if u have different reference frames if a man is travelling at the speed of light - 1m/s, shining light from a flashlight, he will see that light coming out at 3x10^8m/s. a person watching the man travel shining his light will also see light coming out at 3x10^8, not 3x10^8 + 3x10^8 - 1m/s but time will slow down for you, be fast for him |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123