Is this site ethical?
 

They want to be listed on my site...

http://www.modelmania4u.com/modelss.html

I don't see much wrong with it. Most look over 18 and the links go to sites with legal models.

???

what's wrong with it?

He links to a lot of 18- sites...

http://www.modelmania4u.com/links_1.html

Just looks like a tgp without a script to me.
:upsidedow

Its the links to the under 18 stuff I question.

What's to question? There's not one damn thing ethical about that.

Joe I love your site a ton man but just to be fair here... you have a section entitled Drugs & Marijuana

The sites he links to are not illegal from what I can tell. Unethical(not professional) yes but when you run a site called TheUncensored you should expect stuff like this.

If they linkto under 18 the answer is don't do it. :Oh crap

don't Joe - i just clicked links on that page that led to underage NN sites.

nice to see so many fine sponsors on that page mixed in with the creepy sites.

and that's where the NN world began and i guess it still has its ties to it. sad.

I hate it when it's an ethical vs legal question.

We are pornographers. It is not our job to worry about ethics.

So check out the links, make sure there is nothing that can put you in jail or jepordize your money.

If find there is no legal of financial risk, then you are you free to list them.

I think when in doubt, don't

That's not unethical.



But under 18? Would you want your daughter on a site like that?

trojan alert.

duke

*Illegal drugs and marijuana* is not unethical? :Oh crap

Would I want my daughter on a site like what? A NN site? A PORN site? :Oh crap

As much as I hate to agree with the French guy above :1orglaugh he does have a valid point. As disgusting as I personally find NN underage websites if they are legal they are legal. If you as the webmaster of TheUncensored.com have a problem with linking to that guy then hell dont do it obviously. Why are you even asking us?

I checked out the links to some of those sites.
I don't see anything illegal.... BUT........

It's ummmm Shit.....

Despite the fact that they aren't nude and there is no sex in the photos. They are still pornographic.

On a personal level.... And I don't often admit having personal feelings in this biz. I doubt I would be too comfortable associating with them.

Ethics in porn? Wow..what will they think of next?

Hell no I would link to that site.

In one of the banners: "Girls ages 3-15 years"

:helpme

Just because I work with porn, doesn't mean I don't have ethics.

damn! what a question... there is no nudity of CP on the sites that they link to. But they are pretty creepy... kind of like for freaks that like kids to visit.
But if you think it'd be profitable for you to link to them, then do it. I didn't see anything ilegal on any of the links on their pages (freaky and not-too-ethical, yes, but not ilegal).

I have ethics too.
I just do not allow them to interfere with my job.

The people on the net that live in the us, and operate web based business will one day find out why you should not be talking about, showing photos of drugs. One of these days this will be used against you in court.

hi

yeah your right. You dont want to be associated with unethical sites (especially when it comes to underage)

That particular site doesn't look to bad though.

tony

Depends on what country you're in. As a member of NORML, no, it's not unethical.

This is not about legal or illegal, ethic or unethical, and it amaze me how the majority has voted so far (or does it?).

Its all about responsibility. You simply dont mix 5 year old kids with porn sites, or push traffic from porn sites, because it gives a terrible wrong impression - NN or not!
Ask yourself the question why exactly those kiddy sites are listed on a pornsite...
Remember globosale and later verotel? Yes - it is also about policy.

I respect you, Joe, and I respect you raise the question. Apparently that site has much traffic since it is in your top20, but that is not worth your good reputation.

Well....

The responsibilty is with the parents don't you think? Many, if not most, of these sites are made by the parents of these children. And if not the parents directly then in-directly because they bring them to the photographers, etc.

I'm of this opinion.

I am a captiatlist and a pornographer and it is not my job to worry about ethics or un-ethics. And as far as responsibity issues are concern... I'm believe that pornography occupies the same place of cigarettes and alcohol. The consumer is the one that has the burdon of acting responsible and not using these products.

Jesus fucking Christ. :mad: Fucking disgusting :(

Great, thanks for making me search through my cache to delete a banner posted on the board...christ..

Yeah no fucking shit. Thanks MORON.

Remind me never to do business with you. How could I trust you? You don't have ethics.

I'd hit it. :2 cents:

Which? The 3 year old girl or the 5 year old girl?

Is the reality hitting yet for you fucking tools that think it is cool and a business decision to market teen's with barney music and lollipops?

Thats right it brings unwanted attention to our biz...

Psssst.

Don't do business with me. I don't have ethics.

I've already deactivated their listing.

well, at least one of the sites they link to, pamela13.com, has been taken down.

Sorry about that but to some webmasters on this board that Banner is fine with them.
Take a look around. Technically that banner is not illegal and some of these dipshits would move in to market sites like that with 18+ sites.
It happens more than one would think and some American companies out there allow it to happen.

There are Some sick fuckers operating websites these days...