Thumb MGP thumbnail size & productivity [WARNING -- BUSINESS RELATED - NO PICS]
 

Is there actually any correlation between the size of the thumbs on your site and your outbound productivity (productivity on the traffic you send to other sites). I have two different sizes I use. 160x120 and 133x100. The 133x100 thumbs seem to have good productivity everywhere but the 160x120 thumbs only do well on sites that have thumbs around the same size or bigger. Is this a fluke or is this actually the way it is?

Everything depends to what site you're sending your skimmed traffic.
I mean, if you have TGP site with 90x120 size of thumbs, and you're sending traffic to some site with 120x160 thumbs size, the prod. should be a lot better there....But if you send it to 88x88 thumbs size site, then prod. should be very low :(

I'm convinced that you are clueless. Please keep your cake hole shut if you don't know what you're talking about.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

The guy answers your question and thats how you respond? :disgust

What? There are really no pix? What a rippoff! I thought you were kidding!

Holy shit, this is fucking hilarious. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

He didn't answer my question. He reworded my statement and added his own braindead insights (which I assure you aren't based on fact or experience). My response was based on a similar thread he "contributed" to the other night in which he made a similar idiotic response (the thread where he said 100% prodictivity was great).

Yes I have heard that size does matter. :thumbsup