GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I propose the banning of several phrases / terms on this board. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=456407)

Cory W 04-15-2005 07:18 PM

I propose the banning of several phrases / terms on this board.
 
They are as follows:

1) "My point is" :::: It is rare that this combination of words is ever followed up with a point. Therefore, lets eliminate it entirely.

2) "Loose" :::: More often, the word is used in place of "lose" anyways. Lets simplify the situation and only have one option for everyone.

3) "I wouldn't" :::: 9 times out of 10 this precedes "hit it." I move we replace it with "I would," thereby making it a more realistic.

4) "Ambiguous" :::: Although not often used, it is too big of a word to be on a webmaster board. I propose it be replaced with "YARGH!"

baddog 04-15-2005 07:22 PM

It won't work . . .

My point is that these proposals are rather loose and ambiguous, so I wouldn't think they would be widely accepted.

Triple 6 04-15-2005 07:23 PM

no. nice try but that will never happen.

For serious sakes,

::

britney spears

all Lens has to do is replace 'c u n t' with the formentioned

Triple 6 04-15-2005 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
It won't work . . .

My point is that these proposals are rather loose and ambiguous, so I wouldn't think they would be widely accepted.

lol :1orglaugh n1

Cory W 04-15-2005 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
It won't work . . .

My point is that these proposals are rather loose and ambiguous, so I wouldn't think they would be widely accepted.


Haha.....I move we replace all of my post with this picture:

http://www.servingthesun.com/albums/...post.sized.jpg

BlueDesignStudios 04-15-2005 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
It won't work . . .

My point is that these proposals are rather loose and ambiguous, so I wouldn't think they would be widely accepted.

I knew it wouldn't take long for someone to come up with this :)

tungsten 04-15-2005 07:28 PM

nice one Cory :)

fl_prn_str 04-15-2005 07:28 PM

as long as one of the phrases / terms does not include....

would you hit it......

I am on board..... :1orglaugh

Cory W 04-15-2005 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fl_prn_str
as long as one of the phrases / terms does not include....

would you hit it......

I am on board..... :1orglaugh

Or allow "would you hit it," but ban the word "no" from being posted anytime after it LOL

Now that would make sense :thumbsup

Halcyon 04-15-2005 07:31 PM

tee-hee! Cory funny!

Cory W 04-15-2005 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halcyon
tee-hee! Cory funny!


Hi Sexy,

you wanna cyber later tonight?

Halcyon 04-15-2005 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
Hi Sexy,

you wanna cyber later tonight?

a/s/l?

;)

baddog 04-15-2005 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
Haha.....I move we replace all of my post with this picture:

http://www.servingthesun.com/albums/...post.sized.jpg


I second that motion . . . . any discussion or should we just take a vote?

Spunky 04-15-2005 07:42 PM

I propose the term "see sig" and "sig spot" as well

Cory W 04-15-2005 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spunky
I propose the term "see sig" and "sig spot" as well and replace them with this picture:

http://www.servingthesun.com/albums/...id02.sized.jpg


I totally agree brother.

SmokeyTheBear 04-15-2005 08:18 PM

what would be funny is if lens parsed the words " see sig " into " i suck off bums for spare change "

Shoehorn! 04-15-2005 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
4) "Ambiguous" :::: Although not often used, it is too big of a word to be on a webmaster board. I propose it be replaced with "YARGH!"

GFY will then have to pay licensing fees to Chio.

woj 04-15-2005 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog
It won't work . . .

My point is that these proposals are rather loose and ambiguous, so I wouldn't think they would be widely accepted.

:1orglaugh

tedwinters 04-15-2005 08:59 PM

What about:
"New blog!"
:)

Cory W 04-16-2005 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn
GFY will then have to pay licensing fees to Chio.

As they should,

Chio is probably the best poster in here.

Barefootsies 04-16-2005 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn
GFY will then have to pay licensing fees to Chio.


YAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

:thumbsup

Tala 04-16-2005 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halcyon
a/s/l?

;)

y helo thar!! :pimp

Rui 04-16-2005 09:25 AM

WEG Cory - whats the name of that beauty?

Babagirls 04-16-2005 09:28 AM

im all for the "loose" banning

and can we also add "amatuer" and "masterbating" lol

dictionary.com...use it peoples :pimp

Cory W 04-18-2005 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rui
WEG Cory - whats the name of that beauty?

Vida Guerra....

DomBuyer 04-18-2005 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEG Cory
They are as follows:

1) "My point is" :::: It is rare that this combination of words is ever followed up with a point. Therefore, lets eliminate it entirely.

2) "Loose" :::: More often, the word is used in place of "lose" anyways. Lets simplify the situation and only have one option for everyone.

3) "I wouldn't" :::: 9 times out of 10 this precedes "hit it." I move we replace it with "I would," thereby making it a more realistic.

4) "Ambiguous" :::: Although not often used, it is too big of a word to be on a webmaster board. I propose it be replaced with "YARGH!"

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123