michael schiavo should be hanged
 

this asshole wouldn't even let the parents in the room during terri's last breaths? dickhead , rot in hell

She died while he was in the room? They didn't know when she was going to go.

If she where my sister. I would have put him in a persistant vegitative state a long time ago.

And I hope and wish my wife keeps my parents out of my room when I go also.

There is more than 1 side to every story.

We are mere onlookers from the other side of the biased news channels. Unless we know ALL the facts we cannot judge others.

You mean after the father went and attacked a police officer because a nurse wanted to come in and clean her up so they asked everyone to leave the room? Ya I would have thrown his ass out too.


Ya really smart! Lets save/exploit the suffering of/prolong Terri's life wihtout thought but we can lynch the husband he doesn't matter. :1orglaugh

they knew when she was going, or they reported that here she just started failing all together, and the michael would not like the parents in the room.

He will get his due...............

*hung* :thumbsup

Typical Republican.

"I'm Pro-Life lets go hang/murder people we disagree with with." :1orglaugh

Who fucking cares, she died long before this. When you are a vegetable completely supported by machines when does life actually stop? I would have wished the same thing to me...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Did anybody watched yesterday's southpark?

Why not we've already determined he has the right to die :D

With all due respect, I really wish people like you would just

shut
the fuck
up.


Seriously, is the view that good from the cheap seats that you can know every intimate detail of a situation like this? I highly doubt it. The woman is dead, maybe you should get past it and move on with your life, if you have one.

You FOOL!

It's easy to determine from the media all the correct answers. You just have to listen.

Michael Schiavo is the devil incarnate. His reasoning was purely selfish, with no regard to Terri whatsoever. What she wanted was of no consequence to him. Him turning down millions of dollars to turn over custody of Terri, was merely a diversion that was in itself, selfish and for his own personal gain.

Terri Schiavo's parents respect all life, regardless of the quality of that life. But that's a good thing and the way it's supposed to be. They wanted what was best for Terri, and that could be found by simply listening to them and their pastor calling Mr.Schiavo evil at their three daily press conferences.

Oh, if you're famous, you're always guilty, but you'll go free.

what a farkhead

yeah he sounds like an asshole and evil

But yet they had a hard time respecting the laws which this whole media bliss was about......

Damn, maybe my sarcasm wasn't blatant enough.

And her parents motives were pure :


arch 29, 2005
List of Schiavo Donors Will Be Sold by Direct-Marketing Firm
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and JOHN SCHWARTZ

WASHINGTON, March 28 - The parents of Terri Schiavo have authorized a
conservative direct-mailing firm to sell a list of their financial
supporters, making it likely that thousands of strangers moved by her
plight will receive a steady stream of solicitations from
anti-abortion and conservative groups.

"These compassionate pro-lifers donated toward Bob Schindler's legal
battle to keep Terri's estranged husband from removing the feeding
tube from Terri," says a description of the list on the Web site of
the firm, Response Unlimited, which is asking $150 a month for 6,000
names and $500 a month for 4,000 e-mail addresses of people who
responded last month to an e-mail plea from Ms. Schiavo's father.
"These individuals are passionate about the way they value human life,
adamantly oppose euthanasia and are pro-life in every sense of the
word!"

Privacy experts said the sale of the list was legal and even
predictable, if ghoulish.

would you like to live your life like Terri 'lived' her last couple years ?

You should be hanged for suggesting death. Are you a Christian? What do you think Jesus thinks of your post?

no i would hate to live my last moments on earth with the my spouse trying to kill me.

Jesus wasn't non violent all the time.

No bullshit, she said she wanted to die when she would end up like this. He made it happen.

A couple try 13 years. I rather have died 13 years before and let my family morn and move on. She's been a "living" corpse for 13 years. these right to life have no clue that technically NO ONE EVER has to really die. You could take a recently dead person right now and hook it up to machines that will keep there heart going, clean there blood and breathe for them FORVER. And I mean FOREVER. Literally I'm talking forever. As long as the machines are on you WILL NOT DIE. What purpose does this serve? Should all people be put on machine when they die so they can "live" forever? This is insanity.

If there is an afterlife and I was like that and some kept me "alive" for 13 years as soon as they died I'd kick their ass in the afterlife.

Someone failed SUnday School.

whats insane is how you people keep comparing her condition to someone on a respirator, or a machine to keep thier heart beating. She wasn't dying she was killed. Not only that but she was sentenced to death by a court of law and she wasn't convicted of any crimes. Why didn't they starve Jeffrey Daumer? Why don't they starve anyone of these idiots taking little girls molesting them and killing them? The simple fact is that starving someone to death is cruel and unusual punishment. And there is no way you can state other wise. Even the doctors who said she was brain dead said there is no for sure way for them to know if she could feel anyting or not.

If I was like that I would HOPE my spouse would let me die. Her condition is something I would wish on an enemy because death would be too easy. Why would you want something for your spouse that you would want to happen to someone you hate?

exactly, people who dont understand this are completely 100% morons. its not even .0001% about what her parents want, or what her husband wants, its about what she wanted. and you can't question whether or not the husband was lying about it, she trusted him enough to marry him, therefore it should be assumed that she trusts him enough to tell the truth.

and seriously, all bullshit aside - if you honestly can tell me you think if Shaivo *before* her vegetative state would have actually WANTED to live in the condition she's in, you're a g'damn idiot.

Well if all those right to die people are right and she wasn't feeling any pain and probably didn't even know what was going on. Then why did she have to die? What pain was she in? What was so cruel about keeping her alive if she had no idea she was alive in the first place? To me the right to die people really have no argument. Just a bunch of I wouldn't want that to happen to me.

Let see??? maybe they didn't have guns back then? But let me ask you this did jesus use violence to kick people out of the church that where selling products ? or selling redemption ?

Know the whole story before posting ignorant statements. Please.

She was not SENTENCE the fact you say that makes everything else you say moot because it's retarded. When you can talk like an ADULT let me know.

At any rate back to INTELLGENT conversation. Who are YOU to decide if she should live? Youa re pretty arrognat to decide that. So if I was like that and I had it written that I did NOT want to be kept alive likethat YOU have the right to override my wishes? FUCK YOU ASSHOLE. People like you DESERVE to have a family member in that condition so you can LEARN a valuable lesson. I know that sounds sad, but what's sadder is it somtimes that's that for people to LEARN life lessons.

Who cares! :2 cents:

Ummm and I should have my taxes $ use to keep a corpse alive?

Your taxes wheren't paying for shit. plus your a punk didn't you call me a pussy in the other post chump ? talk about an ADULT conversation. I'll still be in vegas punk.

How is a machine to keep her heart beating or keep her breating different than a machine to feed her?

They are all machines. They all keep someone alive.

What's the difference? What did Fox News tell you to believe? :1orglaugh

You really have to tell your self that? if someone believes something different than you that they have to go in a group? It's funny just because i didn't want them to starve this lady all of a sudden i'm a Fox watcher LOL if you only knew how silly that sounds. You don't even know me?

Except for the fact that the court confirmed that dying was in accordance with her wishes.

Her wishes.

Get it?

Why do all you idiots refuse to understand that she wanted to be allowed to die if in that situation? This is why all of you, and I do mean ALL of you, need to have a will drawn up ASAP, and put your own wishes in writing inside a legal document. This is so that if you end up a vegetable your wishes will be respected, and a bunch of over-opinionated shit heads have no opporunities to second-guess those wishes.

clear enough or do you need it in braile?

who the fuck cares

the fact that she married a man and took an oath to love, trust, and honor him for (probably an eternity) stated that she told him she wouldn't want to live like that (+ 3 other people witnessed to this as well), then it should end there and she should be allowed to die.

its not up to us to determine whether or not hes lying. he was the closest person to her much of her adult life, not us, not her parents. the function of the parents is to raise their children till they're adults (18).. you can't let the parents decide this case because their love is so great for her that they don't use logic, they can't let go, it is parental nature. keeping her alive is not only against her best interest as a human, but also against her own personal will according to 4 different witnesses including her husband.

it ends there, and what happened is what should have happened.

Yea one of the few cases where hear say has been accepted in a court of law.

"She wasn't living, she was merely existing."

Eventually they would have. Her husband didn't want her alive so should HE have to pay for her care? No. Are her parents MILLIONAIRES? Um no. She might have lived 40 more years they would have been dead by then. WHO would be paying for her care? Um the TAXPAYER. LEARN before speaking.

she wasn't dying until they stopped feeding her.

You better know what the fuck your talking about before you start talking to me next time. They had numerous offers to take care of Terry for the rest of her life. You and me wouldn't have had to pay shit. Your taxes didn't pay any of the 20k it cost to file any of the 25 apeals they filed. Where do you think that money came from? I just hope you still think i'm a pussy. I will still be in vegas.

She was on Medicaid so everyone?s taxes were paying for her expenses. If I were the husband, I wouldn?t have let the parents in at the same time as me either. For 13 years he tried to honor his wife?s wishes but the parents stood in the way because they couldn?t accept the reality of their daughter?s situation. After they exhausted their court remedies the parents sought special treatment of their case by slandering and defaming the husband. After calling him the most despicable things a person could be called publicly for years, is he is just supposed to turn the other cheek? As nutty as these religious wackos are I wouldn?t be surprised if the husband is dead in a few months anyway as I am sure one of these nut jobs will try and administer ?god?s? justice upon him. I was on the road today and Laura Ingram was on she and the nut cakes on her program were talking like this lady is the second coming of Jesus.

Well didn't her father talk his mother off life support? Also if Michael is so bad and being selfish wouldn't he have taken the million dollars to be done with her and give the rights over to the parents?