Looking back: did the 'shave fisaco' kill mpa3?
 

That really makes most of you such morons using that as the prime reason for not liking mpa3.

All PPS programs shave.. even the onces using NATS.

Unless *everything* from hosting to billing is done by a trusted third party there is no such thing as security and auditing you fucking assclowns!!!

You cant blame mpa3 for providing an essential service many programs require to simply exist!!

When you take part in an industry's "dirty little secret", you shouldn't post about this fucking feature as part of your sales pitch. That's just pouring salt in the fucking wound.

Obviously MPA is here to stay - far too many companies use it. They must provide good support, as they have plenty of supporters. So there is no need to have your tongue up their ass.

Oh brother...

MrTHumbs I think you are desperate for reader impressions. This issue is a dead horse man.

could you tell me how to shave 3. party stats? just wondering

It really is sad when you think about it. Oystein broke new ground but got caught up in schoolyard conversations and hype.