![]() |
Judge makes new rule for bloggers. EFF to ask CA Court of Appeals to intervene
Judge says that although he considers bloggers journalists they do not have the same constitutional right to protect the identities of its sources as traditional media organizations. Depending on the final outcome/appeal of this ruling this could have a chilling effect on many investigative blogs:Oh crap
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...3/05/APPLE.TMP http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news...le.php/3487781 |
Ban the Blog!! Worse than Tgps!!
|
Quote:
|
I can't believe nobody is interested in this with all the talk of blogs here.
Here is a current article at news.com (CNET): The coming crackdown on blogging |
Quote:
As I make up most of the stuff on my blog, I know it isn't relevant to me. |
Quote:
If your blog ever links to anything even remotely politically related the outcome of this affects you. |
BTW, the link above is about a 2nd ruling within one week that judges have made against bloggers.
|
You have the right to free speech. Unless of course you piss off the government. :thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
that would be unfortunate. they really are a form of journalist. maybe the best form, the grass roots. i think it will be found short-sighted and detremental to rule that way.
|
I dont think blogs should be used as a news source, unless its affiliated to a known news source. How would we know which blog is telling the truth, over-reporting, or under-reporting a story... Illegitimate blogs should stay out factual news stories.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123