WarChild |
03-03-2005 07:07 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by viki
I see your point about how she's just in a bathing suit. However, as I said, there is definitely a reason that nearly everyone is taking photos. We also can't see what kind of bathing suit she's wearing... it could be pulled to the side. Who knows what's going on back there?
|
Exactly, you don't know. She's wearing some sort of bathing suit bottom, it appears to be in public. You're willing to assume right off the bat the bathing suit is pulled to the side though.
Quote:
As far as your extremist point of view comment, think about this for a second: you may completely approve of internet pornography, but would you want your 8 or 9 year old child to be exposed to it?
|
My point is that it's not your child, you don't know what's going on other than one snap shot in time. We're all involved in a business that at least some portion of the population finds morally objectionable. It's okay for you to say what's moral and not, and even for the poster to decide this guy needs to die, but I bet you'd take offense to others thinking the same about you.
Quote:
Furthermore, would you want to personally expose your kid to that? If the child had just walked by and noticed the scene, fine... but that's not the case. Her father brought her there on purpose. That's the sickening part to me.
|
So your assertation is the father packed up his child, went out to the beach (or wherever that is) and took his child specifically to watch a girl bent over in a bikini (which is probably pulled to the side). You have no idea if that's the case. Could he have been walking by and decided to stop and take a picture? Is that so bad? Walk down the beach, there's tons of women laying face down with tiny bathing suits on. Is it morally objectionable to take your child to the beach because they might see sun bathers?
|