US making themself an assh... at the UN : morons!
 

This administration and it's phony morality :

OK to invade countries and kill civilians , but abortion : oh Nooooooo , please no ...
Bunch of fucking morons!

Abortion should be mandatory in the US : would result in less idiots in the world....


PS:

Transaltion for 12shits: :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

And one wonders why the rest of the world thinks little of silly Americans. We're 50 years behind Europe on social issues.

My theory is that the average number of people per square mile is so much higher in Europe that Europeans are forced to learn to get along and figure out how to live in such close proximity without choking each other.

Meanwhile we in America have wacko militias stockpiling weapons on their zillion acre farms in Idaho.

land of the free (to do what the government wants you to do)

true true

The two organizations that have been proven to be crooked in the last few years have been the U.N. and the democratic party. The big three media outlets have forgotten to report on this.


I always wonder why democrats allow themselves to side with entities that are in driect competition with the United States of America.

You are asking the United States to endorse something that the majority of its citizens have voted against. That doesn't sound right!

The majority has spoken. If the U.N. doesn't like it, they can leave. Same for you.

People left Europe and started this new country because of the failed social issues. Our country is working pretty good since then. I would say you have that backwards.

fuck you.

53% of people in the US voted against Bush.

because of your stupidity and ignorance... i think the age of abortion should be moved up to 35 or so, to help cull your ilk from the herd.

LOL ... I like you... You are funny ... and not dumb as FunForOne ...

I don't mind people disagreeing, makes the brain work ....

:winkwink:

Uh, you have that wrong. Bush received 51%.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pag...lts/president/

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So why doesn't yours?

And by the way, your statement that you do not mind disagreement is a flat out lie. Your entire argument is based on the supposition that abortion is a moral practice. Anyone who disagrees is apparently stupid or out of touch. Can you explain that position, and how it doesn't conflict with your being so "open minded" about disagreement?

Probably best if you just run home right now and hide in front of the TV. You've really walked into a buzzsaw here. :1orglaugh

In the US, it is a " moral issue "... If not, please educate me .....

2nd, the US are coming back 10 years later ( read the fucking article and click the link ) to re-open something that was done debating with ...

But if you think that rediscussibng abortion is a more important issue to women than health, education and employment , well that indicates your level of intellectual activity : NIL ! :321GFY

fuckin garbage.

you know there are some people that dont believe in abortion or in killing innocent people.

Fine with me. Nobody forces them to get an abortion....

But I presume that " some people that dont believe in abortion or in killing innocent people " are not talking about them, but want to prevent others to do so....
Little different...

Why is Bush so against abortion yet he has no problem giving people lethal injections?

Am i the only one who thought it was amusing that they used the issue of equality when talking about abortion?

yay another daily thread from foreigners huggin american nuts, is there no other country you can start thread after thread after thread about it. :sleep

I said "moral practice" as in "morally acceptable". If you're implying that there is a moral debate about abortion only in the US, well it's self-evident that you have your head up your ass.

And that's not allowed?


Also, you're trying to change your tack here. You said:
And yet, you opened the thread with:


Now, since the above two quotes indicate that you are unwilling to stick to an argument, let me just take the opportunity now to point out another GLARING contradiction in your statement, and an implied hypocrisy contained therein. You are in favor of abortion as a means of birth control, but you decry civilian casualties in war -- ipsofacto, you are contradicting yourself in terms of the value of human life.

Now for the hypocrisy: your stance on these two issues in relationship to each other are simply mirror images, the reverse you might say, of "This admintration and it's phony morality".

So not only are you closed-minded, you're hypocritical as well. Better get that TV Guide dusted off.

The UN is phony as well... so what?

Good point. I guess "they" think a fetus isn't equal. Southern slave owners in the US used that argument about blacks. Nazis used that argument about Jews and homosexuals, and all kinds of people. Now the "femi-Nazis" are using it about fetuses to defend a barbaric form of birth control.

And let me be clear here about my stance on abortion. I am opposed to abortion when it is used to terminate unwanted pregnancies where there is no danger to the mother's health. That is murder. Any woman who has had an abortion because "they weren't ready for a child" will secretly acknowledge that opinion if they remember how they felt after the procedure.

When there is danger to the mother's health, I am not opposed to it.

I agree with that 100%. I think you will find most people do when they have it explained to them like that.

He's pretty irrational, god probably told him its okay to kill evil doers, and bad to kill developing fetus's. :helpme

God told all of us that.

He put it in that book.

He must have taken my advice. Probably watching reruns of Magnum P.I.

Let's see . . . ummm, because the fetus has done no one any harm, while the convicted felon has committed a capital crime against society?

That would be my guess. But one has to remember that a fetus has absolutely NO business developing inside the womb of a woman who is isn't prepared to be a mother. So I suppose that must be a capital crime against society. At least the U.S. Supreme court equates it thus. :pimp

Strikes me as the primary reason for it.

You've seriously been giving 12clicks a run for his money recently for least intelligent GFY'er.

Show me where the bible talks about fetuses or abortion. Fucking retard, you should do the rest of the world a favor and abort yourself.

Can I shit on your face?

People who are against a woman's right to choose are the same people who would say thinks like drug addicts should be sterilized. Hypocritical idiots, basically.

Heh, the same people who change their tune on drug addicts when it turns out one of their own is one:glugglug

haha, very true.


http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/blogs/s...igade/rush.jpg

A lot of them also seem to occasionally forget about how evil gays are...


http://americablog.blogspot.com/malecorpsxx.jpg

ahahahaha, its so funny to watch you chumps climb off of john kerry's cock and on to the next pile of shit.

life must suck when you're always wrong.

You are so fucking stupid, that people on your side of the isle are laughing at you.


First of all, any hard working small business person who votes democrat is obviously not well informed on the issues.

Most of the world doesn't give a shit about your god or his book pal. ;)

"because theyre the root of all evil"
christ i guess bush's AA class was full of flipped christians that infuenced his retarded look on things

The majority of the voters in a democratic government of the only superpower on earth apparently do.

Pal

religious books are only good for toilet paper.

[QUOTE=12clicks]ahahahaha, its so funny to watch you chumps climb off of john kerry's cock and on to the next pile of shit.

QUOTE]

:1orglaugh

http://www.ibillsucks.info/files/amerika-foreva.jpg

Shit it is ....

I absolutely agree. The US has no obligation to follow any international conventions - as long as they don't sign it.

If you don't want to hear "liberal pussies" complain that the US is in violation of legislation - such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (which describes how a goverment is to treat it's own citizens), the Geneva Conventions (which describe how a government treats citizens of other countries), the Bretton Woods Agreement (international economic order), several WTO rulings (the administration of the new international economic order) - then your presidents shouldn't sit down and sign these agreements.

I should have broken that up into more than one sentence.

Ain't it the truth...Religion is the source of al rotten hate and evil on this planet.

[QUOTE=directfiesta]Hey there Monsewer fiesta, how you doing? How were those Magnum PI reruns? Did you forget about our little debate here, or were you just hoping it would blow over?

I haven't forgotten. Ready for a rematch? I'm willing to give you one more shot at the title...

As I said...