GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   NUDE underage model website owner doing business on GFY (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=436053)

loveithard 02-23-2005 06:05 PM

NUDE underage model website owner doing business on GFY
 
whois from schoolpassion.com:
Administrative Contact:
Nagiev, Dmitry [email protected]
Ostankino 46
Moscow, MO 101000
RU
+70952174507

whois from bd-sisters.com:
Registrant:
Vlad
NASA ([email protected])
Moscow, Morozenka,12
Moscow
,23456
RU
Tel. +095.2341290

whois from xxl-cash.com:
Registrant:
Models Entertainment Agency LLC (MEA Models)
Customer Support ([email protected])
723 S. Casino Center Bldv., 2nd Floor
Las-Vegas
NV,89138
US
Tel. +1.7029324078

Draw your own conclusions please, something smells very rotten here. All sites have different registrant info in the whois, but all are administrated using the same email adress.

Alex 02-23-2005 06:07 PM

Just the email is what you have to base it on?

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2005 06:07 PM

I didnt even know nasa had a moscow office :)

loveithard 02-23-2005 06:08 PM

Send this stuff to ASACP do NOT post it here

Alex 02-23-2005 06:08 PM

All content submitted on this site is a work of art. There is no age limit for the work of art.
Our site is a paysite, which means that you have to pay for access.
THIS SITE IS TOTALLY LEGAL.



I think there was a case on this before
Art is fair grounds

MarkH 02-23-2005 06:08 PM

hmmmm....

KMR Stitch 02-23-2005 06:08 PM

wtf.????? soooo whois info..now what

DarkJedi 02-23-2005 06:09 PM

http://www.google.com/search?q=murci...=Google+Search

loveithard 02-23-2005 06:09 PM

10 year old nude girls in a paysite isn't legal bro. That's for sure.

reynold 02-23-2005 06:09 PM

Oh man, that sucks.

James White 02-23-2005 06:11 PM

Do what? Im not seeing what your saying

PrivateIvy 02-23-2005 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex
All content submitted on this site is a work of art. There is no age limit for the work of art.
Our site is a paysite, which means that you have to pay for access.
THIS SITE IS TOTALLY LEGAL.



I think there was a case on this before
Art is fair grounds

I didn't see ANYTHING that qualified as "Art" on that site :Oh crap


Ivy

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2005 06:11 PM

the sites they offer look fairly shady

James White 02-23-2005 06:12 PM

oh i see it now...yikes... this is gonna be drama

Theo 02-23-2005 06:12 PM

disturbing

who hosts these craps? notify their host, possible they dont know about it

Rich 02-23-2005 06:13 PM

Are those links to underage sites? Stupid move.

Alex 02-23-2005 06:13 PM

Yea i know
Thats the disclaimer

It is art, but not the kind of art you make with paints.
THis is CP shit.

V_RocKs 02-23-2005 06:14 PM

I brought this up about 2 months ago... I got shot down.

Good luck...

jact 02-23-2005 06:14 PM

Dude, don't post CP on the board, wtf are you thinking? It's disgusting, he should be dealt with, but now I've got that shit in my history. Art isn't an excuse, that shit's just disgusting.

loveithard 02-23-2005 06:17 PM

you brought that up and got shot down??? wtf, these xxl-cash people are running contests on gfy and everyone is cheering to them....wonder how long it takes until they have their "art" models up in their "legal" paysites...

Flu 02-23-2005 06:18 PM

Looks like the faces are imposed on the bodies of skinny small tittied women.

nastyking 02-23-2005 06:18 PM

nevermind

loveithard 02-23-2005 06:19 PM

look for xxl-cash and you will find a current contest run by them on the first gfy page

DraX 02-23-2005 06:20 PM

ART !!!
WHAT A SMOKESCREEN !!!

:boid

loveithard 02-23-2005 06:23 PM

Look at this copy from archive.org

http://web.archive.org/web/200311280...-company.info/

Here the underage sites they run are listed next to the "legal" ones...

Theo 02-23-2005 06:28 PM

I never understood why CC companies allow these kind of sites to be processed.

Antonio 02-23-2005 06:29 PM

I'm not clicking these links, but how do you know he's a GFYer?

Alex 02-23-2005 06:30 PM

Alex(XXX-L Cash)
Thread on front page now

PrivateIvy 02-23-2005 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soul_Rebel
I never understood why CC companies allow these kind of sites to be processed.

I just went to see who was processing for them and it looks like the billing has been pulled on that first site , dead page

Ivy

nastyking 02-23-2005 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antonio
I'm not clicking these links, but how do you know he's a GFYer?

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=432062

MissMiranda 02-23-2005 06:36 PM

Thats disgusting, Ive never taken the time to look at sites like this before but on the second link there are flashes of what look like 5 year old faces, and then one of the pages have a girl that looks about 8

how is that art? Ive never seen a painting of a nude 8 year old girl on some sex pose in my life.

V_RocKs 02-23-2005 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Antonio
I'm not clicking these links, but how do you know he's a GFYer?

Ohhh brother...

V_RocKs 02-23-2005 06:38 PM

Ohh... I remember the 2 month old threads convo...

He said he bought the virginshotos.com and other domains (the legal ones) from the B&D company. Then created his own program...

Webby 02-23-2005 06:40 PM

Quote:

NUDE underage model website owner doing business on GFY
Crap!

There is no "art" on these sites - they can argue that one with a judge before he does the 25 year sentence.

The whole concept is pandering to pedos and appears to be a "milder" entry level into cross/upselling. The history of these sites show kids where there is nada doubt they are under age - some look like 10 - 12.

Flip side is some are probably of age - but the marketing ploy remains the same - pedoworld!

Quote:

THIS SITE IS TOTALLY LEGAL
That's a statement by a pedo if ever I saw one - they claim anything to cover their asses.

loveithard 02-23-2005 06:43 PM

sure, and he just happens to have same email adress that is used on the underage sites and the photogrpahy happens to be from the same studio as on the underage sites....what kind of crap is that?? And his new site "QUEENSOFEROTICTEENS.COM" has the same DNS server (ns.nasa-dns.com ns1.nasa-dns.com") as the childpornn sites....

nastyking 02-23-2005 06:44 PM

do a search for "Models Entertainment Agency" on google groups for more evidence

Shoehorn! 02-23-2005 06:45 PM

Pretty fucked up indeed.

rollinOn20s 02-23-2005 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jact
Dude, don't post CP on the board, wtf are you thinking? It's disgusting, he should be dealt with, but now I've got that shit in my history. Art isn't an excuse, that shit's just disgusting.

:thumbsup

RawAlex 02-23-2005 06:50 PM

Spreads, chest shots, and other teasing images are NOT "art", they are porn. Porn with models under 18 ain't legal.

Anyone involved with this guy, his sites, or anything at all related should run away quick.

Another scumbag.

Alex

Stomped 02-23-2005 06:51 PM

Look at http://www.xxl-cash.com/

It's approved by ASACP

WTF???

(Well, yes, there isn't any child pornography, i mean, girls having SEX, only underaged models naked..)

iwantchixx 02-23-2005 06:52 PM

Interesting. While I regret looking into this to draw my own conclusions I have learned something about some very popular teen sites floating around TGPs lately. Kind of left me with a sick feeling in my stomach but it leaves me wondering about the validity of virgins-art and virginsphotos as far as the age of models are concerned.
Those virgins-art and virginsphotos sites have a bit of an underage flair to it if you will. I wonder if they are 100% legal then if this is the case that this same guy has -18 teen model sites.

There is no hardcore evident on those underage domains so really, where these sites are hosted it may actually be legal unfortunately. Also, it has been ruled before that just posing children is not deemed illegal so long as not in sexual context. Immoral in our eyes... yes, illegal? Not really yet unfortunately.
One thing that struck me though was that the sisters one has content on it that looks like content I've seen around on many TGPs promoting virgins-art and virginsphotos. Looks like some of it is UNDER and some it OF age. Also, just from looking at the first pages of the underage sites it appears that some of these same models appear on virgin-art and virgin-photos. I've seen the same girls on TGP galleries all over the web. If it's the same set or not, who knows. The content I found seemed like 18+, but after seeing this, it makes me wonder, is it really 18+?

tungsten 02-23-2005 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iwantchixx
Interesting. While I regret looking into this to draw my own conclusions I have learned something about some very popular teen sites floating around TGPs lately. Kind of left me with a sick feeling in my stomach but it leaves me wondering about the validity of virgins-art and virginsphotos as far as the age of models are concerned.
Those virgins-art and virginsphotos sites have a bit of an underage flair to it if you will. I wonder if they are 100% legal then if this is the case that this same guy has -18 teen model sites.

There is no hardcore evident on those underage domains so really, where these sites are hosted it may actually be legal unfortunately. Also, it has been ruled before that just posing children is not deemed illegal so long as not in sexual context. Immoral in our eyes... yes, illegal? Not really yet unfortunately.
One thing that struck me though was that the sisters one has content on it that looks like content I've seen around on many TGPs promoting virgins-art and virginsphotos. Looks like some of it is UNDER and some it OF age. Also, just from looking at the first pages of the underage sites it appears that some of these same models appear on virgin-art and virgin-photos. I've seen the same girls on TGP galleries all over the web. If it's the same set or not, who knows. The content I found seemed like 18+, but after seeing this, it makes me wonder, is it really 18+?

what are you talking about as long as there is no sexual act, its illegal to be acting in adult movies if you are under 18 period :helpme

Webby 02-23-2005 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nastyking
do a search for "Models Entertainment Agency" on google groups for more evidence

Yep... It don't take a brain to see the overall marketing plan :-)

The usual "enticing" and leading on to cross-sells/upsells etc - even the spam promo is done of the basis of "lolita" keywords.

Don't have to see any more - it's clear as day they are previewing for *real* child porn memberships on other sites. Check out the history and ya got 8-14 year old kids.

I think the charge is conspiracy :winkwink:

iwantchixx 02-23-2005 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tungsten
what are you talking about as long as there is no sexual act, its illegal to be acting in adult movies if you are under 18 period :helpme

I'm commenting on what I saw and I saw no adult movies nor any hardcore nor any sexual acts. I would bet 1000 to 1 though that there probably is inside and I eally don't want to find out either way as I'm not particularly interested in kids.

Steen2 02-23-2005 07:05 PM

Playing with fire here.

gh0st 02-23-2005 07:06 PM

wtf how can they do that

nastyking 02-23-2005 07:06 PM

# GET www.xxl-cash.com
500 Can't connect to www.xxl-cash.com:80

now .. that was fast

V_RocKs 02-23-2005 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nastyking
# GET www.xxl-cash.com
500 Can't connect to www.xxl-cash.com:80

now .. that was fast

Works fine in California...

loveithard 02-23-2005 07:14 PM

just some more info to back up that we are looking at kiddie porn and spam operation here

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=d...q=xxl-cash.com

Mr.Fiction 02-23-2005 07:14 PM

I didn't click on them, but don't post links to underage shit on GFY. http://www.gofuckyourself.com/images/icons/mad2.gif


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123