GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   No black jurors for Michael Jackson (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=435879)

mardigras 02-23-2005 12:45 PM

No black jurors for Michael Jackson
 
Tom Snedden just used his last challenge to kick the last potential black juror out of the case. He has now sat a conservative middle-class jury, the most likely to convict on these charges.

So much for a jury of your peers...

ADL_JD 02-23-2005 12:46 PM

No black defendant either.

cosis 02-23-2005 12:49 PM

7 whites, 4 hispanics and 1 asian

cosis 02-23-2005 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.

:1orglaugh

DavieVegas 02-23-2005 12:50 PM

no black jurors? hes gonna get aquited...i mean hes been white for most his life

Manowar 02-23-2005 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.

:1orglaugh

BRISK 02-23-2005 12:51 PM

So many jokes to be made about this

European Lee 02-23-2005 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DavieVegas
no black jurors? hes gonna get aquited...i mean hes been white for most his life

Personally i would think having black jurors on the case is something that the defense team wouldnt want under any circumstances.

Wacko has done his best over the last decade or 3 to get away from his black roots and im sure that would play in the minds of any black jurors in this case somewhat.

Regards,

Lee

sweetME 02-23-2005 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.

:1orglaugh

JFPdude 02-23-2005 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.


Damn I'm slow I was hitting this thread to respond with that LMFAO

:1orglaugh

robfantasy 02-23-2005 12:54 PM

MJ is fucked for sure now

jimb 02-23-2005 12:57 PM

im just waiting for the accusers parents to take the 50 million and have the case disolve.

Jim

cosis 02-23-2005 12:57 PM

They are already calling them "The Jackson Twelve"

OG LennyT 02-23-2005 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
So much for a jury of your peers...

What do you mean? For him to have a jury of peers, you would have to load the panel with white 40+ yr old pedos.. hmmm, find some of the webmasters of those pedo-sites :2 cents:

mardigras 02-23-2005 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimb
im just waiting for the accusers parents to take the 50 million and have the case disolve.

Jim

Won't happen. They changed the law because of and for Michael Jackson. They could actually throw the kid in jail if he didn't testify against Jackson.

mardigras 02-23-2005 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dvd316
What do you mean? For him to have a jury of peers, you would have to load the panel with white 40+ yr old pedos.. hmmm, find some of the webmasters of those pedo-sites :2 cents:

LOL, funny. Now for a serious response. If this were a true jury of his peers, based on the area there would be at least one Latino.

GatorB 02-23-2005 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cosis
7 whites, 4 hispanics and 1 asian

Well MJ does look like he is 7/12 white 4/12 hispanic and 1/12 asian

escorpio 02-23-2005 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by European Lee
Personally i would think having black jurors on the case is something that the defense team wouldnt want under any circumstances.

Wacko has done his best over the last decade or 3 to get away from his black roots and im sure that would play in the minds of any black jurors in this case somewhat.

Regards,

Lee

O.J. Simpson wasn't exactly a down brotha and look what black jurors did for him.

lazycash 02-23-2005 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
LOL, funny. Now for a serious response. If this were a true jury of his peers, based on the area there would be at least one Latino.

There is, 4 of them.

Wiggles 02-23-2005 01:57 PM

haha he isn't black, he's just a wierd child molester.

ytcracker 02-23-2005 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.

HAHAHAHA

tungsten 02-23-2005 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.

:1orglaugh

Tom_PM 02-23-2005 02:11 PM

"peers" doesnt mean your race..thats got nothing to do with jury selection. The 12 people are people from around where he lives. They're basically his neighbors from his community. Nobody is going to be an exact replica of any defendant.. especially not an eccentric superstar with his own bizarre sprawling ranch with kiddie rides, lol.

mardigras 02-23-2005 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash
There is, 4 of them.

Ah, earlier in the day I had heard there were none.

3 days was too quick to sit this jury. 10 minutes (strict) with each potential juror with all requests for extentions or in camera meetings denied is going to leave a good appellate issue if there's a conviction.

Pleasurepays 02-23-2005 02:14 PM

if it was a jury of his peers, it would be a jury of freakish looking chimpanzees.

jmho

Cassie 02-23-2005 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
They changed the law because of and for Michael Jackson. They could actually throw the kid in jail if he didn't testify against Jackson.


seriously?

mardigras 02-23-2005 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom
"peers" doesnt mean your race..thats got nothing to do with jury selection. The 12 people are people from around where he lives.

I would bet that if there was a black defendant from an area that is 80% black and they sat an all-white jury an appellate court would likely agree that they were not served by a jury of their peers.

Pleasurepays 02-23-2005 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
I would bet that if there was a black defendant from an area that is 80% black and they sat an all-white jury an appellate court would likely agree that they were not served by a jury of their peers.

maybe it should be a jury of idiots that have a private zoo, sleep in an oxygen tent, fondle children, live in a fantasy amusement park, collect human bones and change their skin color?

mardigras 02-23-2005 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassie
seriously?

Yep, Tom Sneddon was instrumental in changing the law. Not only can they now bring in evidence from the 90's case they previously couldn't, they could proceed without the cooperation of the current claimant if they had enough other witnesses they thought could prove the case.

The main reason for these changes was Michael Jackson, so Sneddon jumped at the opportunity to charge him again after that documentary aired where he admitted letting kids sleep in his bed.

mardigras 02-23-2005 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
maybe it should be a jury of idiots that have a private zoo, sleep in an oxygen tent, fondle children, live in a fantasy amusement park, collect human bones and change their skin color?

Are you white? If so, how would you feel if you were charged with a crime against a black victim and there were no white jury members?

Tom_PM 02-23-2005 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
I would bet that if there was a black defendant from an area that is 80% black and they sat an all-white jury an appellate court would likely agree that they were not served by a jury of their peers.

But thats my point. The 12 people ARE his neighbors. Race is not an issue in seating the jury..

gh0st 02-23-2005 02:45 PM

it doesn't matter if you're black or white

media 02-23-2005 02:57 PM

Supposedly alot of the jurors have children.. this could get ugly for him..

brand0n 02-23-2005 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by media
Supposedly alot of the jurors have children.. this could get ugly for him..

you dont need kids to convict someone for raping 1.

latinasojourn 02-23-2005 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.


haha, good one.

truth is, even if the jury was 100% black jackson is going to fry on this one.

in fact, jackson trying to become white and fuck around with little white boys turns their stomachs just as much as anyone else.

MJ joke-of-the-day:

"hey, did you see michael jackson at KMart today"

"yeah, the sign said Little Boys Pants half off, and michael told the driver to stop."

$5 submissions 02-23-2005 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by media
Supposedly alot of the jurors have children.. this could get ugly for him..

Yep. Not looking good for MJ at all.

Ramos 02-23-2005 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
Tom Snedden just used his last challenge to kick the last potential black juror out of the case. He has now sat a conservative middle-class jury, the most likely to convict on these charges.

So much for a jury of your peers...


Black folks quit claiming Jackson once he turned white and got a monkey!

This white jury is better for him in the long run! :321GFY

sonofsam 02-23-2005 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.


lol, thanks for the laugh :thumbsup

reynold 02-23-2005 06:20 PM

What does color have to do with the case anyway?

mardigras 02-23-2005 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reynold
What does color have to do with the case anyway?

It doesn't, but it will to a percentage of the jurors whether they admit it or not.

OG LennyT 02-23-2005 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by escorpio
O.J. Simpson wasn't exactly a down brotha and look what black jurors did for him.


hahaha.... good point :thumbsup

sickkittens 02-23-2005 10:29 PM

If the glove don't fit. You must acquit.

Pleasurepays 02-23-2005 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
Are you white? If so, how would you feel if you were charged with a crime against a black victim and there were no white jury members?

apparently you have no idea how jurors are selected. do you need to be taken to law school? or you comfortable that can you research it on your own?

Pleasurepays 02-23-2005 10:59 PM

do you know why michael jackson likes twenty eight year olds?





because there is twenty of them.

mardigras 02-23-2005 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
apparently you have no idea how jurors are selected. do you need to be taken to law school? or you comfortable that can you research it on your own?

If you don't think lawyers care whether they have black or white jurors on their case you obviously missed the news coverage today:winkwink:

axelcat 02-23-2005 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADL_JD
No black defendant either.

:1orglaugh

Warden 02-23-2005 11:04 PM

Ive said it before and I will say it again


ONLY IN AMERICA can a poor black boy from Gary Indiana grow up to be a rich white man!

Paraskass 02-23-2005 11:11 PM

http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com...kson_la112.jpg

Pleasurepays 02-23-2005 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mardigras
If you don't think lawyers care whether they have black or white jurors on their case you obviously missed the news coverage today:winkwink:

both the lawyers and the prosecutor choose/question/approve/dismiss the jurors. they are not appointed, they are selected.

if you think that any statement made on the news on behalf of Michael Jackson is not a part of the typical showbusiness leading up to a media circus of a trial for a walking freakshow who diddles kids, you have obviously missed more than a few random statements on TV.
:winkwink:

Too bad Johnny Cocharan is not on this... "if the penis don't fit, you must acquit"


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123