![]() |
verotel cancels account
This is a friends site, all content is exclusive legal content. Any idea why they won't approve him, what other companys can he use.teensandwebcams
|
didn't they tell him why they're not accepting him
|
no just canceled
|
1. he used the word teen in the domain name
2. his tour although probably all legal has some questionable content If I was a processor I probably would turn away from it also. |
1. "teen" domain name
2. Naked woman on front page (nudity before adult warning acceptance) 3. Insufficiant "Adults Only" warning. 4. Several images clearly trying to imply "young" girls |
Quote:
2. no, see above 3. see above 4. no 5. probably there are some problems with the members area |
fuck verotel, they used to cancel websites with lame excuses
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Maybe it is the fequent use of the word "young"
|
Quote:
|
Maybe fuck Verotel and get an AVS
SexPicturesPass.com pays up to $30 per $4 join (I think) Read XXXDwarf tutorial (use search feature to find it) |
verotel is shit. Run while you still can.
|
Quote:
|
Got a license for all of the content? Much of it is from other websites.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
who shoud he turn to? |
Quote:
|
vertotel has also canned several other programs in the past week !!!!!!!!!
|
I think we know the reason now...
|
Ummm from the main page:
"The hosts of this site are not liable for any content which may be in violation of state and/or federal laws. If any content on this site is in known violation of the law please contact the webmaster immediately. " Not exactly 2257 compliant. |
Quote:
Verotel is a fine processor if you play your cards right, if verotel declined this site believe me ccbill would do the same. why don't you just contact verotel and ask them why? Use live chat if you can't reach them by email. If you ask me the site was declined because of "teen" subject. |
interesting...should probably go with ccbill or epoch anyways..
|
Quote:
|
alright just had him forward the email from verotel to me......under age content I just wish they were consistant, I have seen similar content on there sites.
|
Oh shit that sucks, not even a warning to remove it?
I know your biz is always legal, another Verotel mistake. |
no the email goes like this
From: "merchantsupport" <[email protected]> To: <*********@comcast.net> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 2:44 PM Subject: Re:Test request > > Hi, > > Verotel underwriting has reviewed your site, and we currently can not offer > processing for your company/organization due to the nature of content sold > on your website. We do not provide processing for the sale of images (of > any nature) of models under 18 years old or links to sites who do. > > Regards, > Sinan > Merchant support |
I hate shitty companies like that, at least contact you for ore information whats needed ect...
Of course this is after you go through their whole system. Lame, sorry my man.. good luck with who you choose next. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123